Explore the unique nuances of REIT accounting, valuation, and disclosures under IFRS and US GAAP, including cost vs. fair value models, Funds from Operations (FFO), Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO), and Net Asset Value (NAV). Gain insights into regulatory requirements, potential pitfalls, and real-world applications.
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) present perhaps one of the most fascinating niches in the world of long-term asset accounting. Unlike typical corporations that invest in machinery and intangible patents, REITs invest largely in physical properties like shopping centers, apartment buildings, hotels, and office spaces. Those properties, in turn, generate rental income (and potentially capital appreciation) that can be distributed back to shareholders. In my experience, the first time you see the word “REIT,” you might go, “Wait, that’s just a fancy name for a real estate holding company, right?” And you wouldn’t be entirely wrong. But the unique tax, regulatory, and accounting treatments make REITs a special vehicle worth digging into carefully.
Below, we’ll unpack REIT structures, discuss IFRS and US GAAP treatments of real estate assets, explore key analytical measures like Funds from Operations (FFO), Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO), and Net Asset Value (NAV), and examine the implications of using different valuation models. We’ll also sprinkle in references to the rest of the chapters to showcase how analyzing REIT assets ties into the broader financial statement analysis framework.
By structure, a REIT pools investors’ funds to invest primarily in income-producing real estate or real estate-related assets. Different jurisdictions have varying technical requirements (like minimum distribution thresholds or property-type restrictions), but generally:
• REITs must distribute a significant portion (often 90% or more) of their taxable income to shareholders as dividends.
• REITs often enjoy favorable tax treatments—such as no corporate-level tax—if they comply with certain rules (e.g., ownership requirements, property-holding thresholds).
From an analyst’s standpoint, REIT assets typically include:
• Commercial and residential properties held for rental income.
• Development properties slated for future use or sale.
• Real estate-related investments like mortgage securities in certain specialized REIT structures.
The focus is usually on such properties’ ability to generate rental revenue and appreciate in value. For more on analyzing property-level performance, refer back to Chapter 3.1 on “Balance Sheet Presentation and Classification,” where we learn about property, plant, and equipment. But keep in mind that for REITs, properties are the entire business, not just a supporting asset.
Different countries impose varied restrictions on REITs. For instance, some jurisdictions might allow only specific property segments (office, retail, residential, industrial), while others have more flexibility. The requirement to distribute a large portion of income as dividends directly impacts how much cash can be reinvested in new property acquisitions. Consequently, REITs often raise capital via new share issuances or debt financing.
Under IFRS, properties held by REITs typically fall under the scope of IAS 40 (Investment Property), which grants two main measurement models:
• Cost Model
• Fair Value Model
Under the cost model, the REIT initially capitalizes its real estate at cost and subsequently depreciates it (less any impairment). The carrying amount on the balance sheet may end up being substantially lower than the property’s market value if it appreciates significantly over time.
Under the fair value model, the REIT revalues its investment properties to their fair values at each balance sheet date. These changes in fair value typically flow through profit or loss, though IFRS also allows them to flow through Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) in certain cases (depending on the standard’s specifics and management election). In practice, many REITs favor the fair value approach because it better reflects the underlying economics of real estate holdings. Yet it introduces volatility in earnings, which may or may not sit well with certain investors.
By comparison, US GAAP generally requires real estate assets held for rental or investment purposes to be measured at depreciated historical cost (ASC 970, Real Estate—General). Fair value disclosures are often provided only in notes to the financial statements if deemed relevant. If a property is classified as “held for sale,” guidance specific to that classification (ASC 360-10) might apply, resulting in measurement at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Some US-based REITs provide supplemental disclosures with their estimate of the “Net Asset Value” (NAV) for their properties. This NAV figure aims to capture the difference between historical cost (book value) and estimated market value. Because these fair values aren’t recognized on the face of the primary financial statements, the disclosures can become critical for any serious REIT analysis. If you want to see another angle on intangible assets or impairment models, take a quick look at Chapter 6.2, “Depreciation, Amortization, and Asset Impairment,” which can also apply in certain REIT contexts.
Below is a simple Mermaid diagram illustrating the two measurement models. This chart gives a high-level comparison of the cost model and fair value model.
flowchart LR
A["Cost Model <br/>(Depreciated)"] --> B["Lower Volatility <br/>in Reported Earnings"]
A --> C["Potential <br/>Understatement of Asset Value"]
D["Fair Value Model <br/>(Periodic Revaluations)"] --> E["Greater Earnings Volatility"]
D --> F["Reflects Market <br/>Value Each Period"]
Generally, a REIT operating under IFRS might elect either approach, but the fair value model can make the balance sheet more reflective of market conditions—at the price of more earnings fluctuations.
If you’ve ever sat in a meeting with real estate analysts, you’ve probably heard them drop acronyms like “FFO” and “AFFO.” These are not GAAP terms but have become so prevalent in the industry that ignoring them is basically impossible.
The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) defines Funds from Operations (FFO) as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding:
• Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets.
• Gains or losses from the sale of depreciable real estate.
• Certain other real estate acquisition expenses.
The rationale is that real estate—particularly well-maintained, stable properties—may not necessarily lose value according to the often straight-line depreciation that GAAP requires. So an office building in a prime city location might actually appreciate, even as GAAP net income is dragged down by depreciation expense. By adding back real estate depreciation, FFO attempts to capture a more realistic cash flow metric from property operations.
Mathematically, you can think of FFO (simplified) as:
Net Income
AFFO refines FFO by deducting recurring capital expenditures and maintenance costs that are required to keep the properties producing revenue. Analysts want to see how much cash flow is genuinely available for distribution after the REIT makes the necessary outlays to keep buildings in good shape.
So you could say:
FFO
– Recurring Capital Expenditures
= AFFO
Some REITs might also adjust for rent straight-lining effects, tenant improvements, or leasing commissions. The exact definition of AFFO can vary slightly across the industry, so a bit of caution is advised when comparing one REIT’s AFFO to another’s.
NAV is somewhat analogous to “book value per share” for a traditional company—except that for a REIT, it’s typically an adjusted figure that updates property values to fair market levels. Many REIT managers or analysts recast the balance sheet by substituting the historical cost of properties with their estimated fair values. After adjusting for liabilities, the result is an estimated net asset value. NAV can serve as an important reference point for pricing REIT shares, as investors often compare the share price to the NAV per share. If shares consistently trade at a steep discount to NAV, that might indicate the market expects future challenges in the property portfolio (or simply that the REIT is out of favor).
Under the fair value model, upward and downward revaluations appear on the income statement (or sometimes in OCI, depending on local GAAP or IFRS elections). For an office park in a thriving metro area, that might lead to surges in reported income. Conversely, in a downturn, revaluations can deliver painful hits to the bottom line.
A key challenge for REIT management is the reliability of the appraisals underpinning fair value. Mostly external appraisals are required for IFRS-based REITs, but those can be costly and somewhat subjective. Let’s be real: appraising real estate is as much art as science. This is precisely why some REITs choose the cost model (in IFRS) or must use depreciated cost (in US GAAP) and then rely on comprehensive footnote disclosures.
For cost-based REITs, the longer they hold a property in a market with rising prices, the more likely the balance sheet’s carrying value will be understated relative to actual market worth. That can present interesting buy/sell signals for potential investors who suspect that the real estate is worth substantially more than it’s carried for, even after subtracting the REIT’s leverage. On the flip side, in a declining market, holding property at cost might elevate the risk of value impairment.
As you’ll recall from Chapter 13, ratio analysis can transform raw numbers into interpretable relationships. For a REIT:
• The cost model can lead to stable (but possibly understated) asset values, which might elevate return on assets (ROA) or reduce the debt-to-equity ratio if the property has appreciated in actual market value.
• The fair value model can inject volatility into net income and equity, which, in turn, can shake up coverage ratios or leverage metrics from one period to the next.
To get clarity, many analysts do a “pro forma” restatement of financial statements under the approach not used. For instance, if the REIT is on historical cost, an analyst might adjust the balance sheet and income statement to reflect fair value changes gleaned from footnote disclosures.
Imagine a REIT, UrbanSpaces, that owns a portfolio of downtown apartment buildings:
• Under IFRS, UrbanSpaces has elected the fair value model.
• Each quarter, an independent valuer re-assesses the property portfolio.
• This quarter, property values rise by 8% due to an improved local market.
UrbanSpaces recognizes a fair value gain in its income statement, boosting net income. Meanwhile, another REIT with a similar portfolio that uses depreciated cost might only record depreciation expense, resulting in a lower net income figure—despite seeing the real estate appreciate in reality. From an analyst’s standpoint, you’d likely want to compare both REITs on an NAV basis and incorporate FFO or AFFO to smooth out the distorting effects of their chosen models.
Just as we looked at intangible assets (Chapter 6.4) or partial asset retirements (Chapter 6.6), analyzing REIT properties draws on concepts of cost capitalization, impairment, and the interplay between reported numbers and real economic value. Understanding these complexities helps to prevent misinterpretation of reported net income, especially when real estate depreciation, gains on property sales, or revaluation changes come into play.
It’s also wise to evaluate the REIT’s liabilities. Many REITs load up on debt to finance their property purchases—check out Chapter 3.4 on “Noncurrent Liabilities,” or see Chapter 7 for more on “Long-Term Liabilities and Equity,” where we examine different financing structures. Because REITs must distribute such a large portion of earnings, they often rely heavily on external financing for growth. That can increase financial risk, so analyzing their debt ratios becomes essential.
• Consistent Valuation Approach: If you’re comparing two or more REITs, try to restate them using a uniform approach if possible.
• Beware of Subjective Appraisals: Even “fair value” can be guesswork when the market is thin or properties are specialized.
• Closely Track AFFO: AFFO can be more reliable than FFO for understanding the REIT’s true, recurring cash generation. Not all REITs define AFFO identically—read the footnotes.
• Understand the Dividend Policy: High dividend yields might be appealing, but they also reduce cash retained for growth, sometimes creating a need for frequent share issuances.
• Monitor Debt Maturities: REITs dependent on short-term debt rolling can be vulnerable to interest rate spikes and liquidity crunches.
I recall a friend back in Chicago observing REIT earnings announcements quarterly, and how often the “headline FFO” could overshadow the net income figure. In bull real estate markets, it’s all about those new property acquisitions and the rising fair values. Meanwhile, in down cycles, that same approach can bring large losses as property appraisals move sharply downward. So you want to keep your eyes on both—the GAAP net income for compliance and the non-GAAP measures for reality-checks.
• IAS 40 – Investment Property:
https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ias-40-investment-property/
• NAREIT (National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts):
https://www.reit.com/
• ASC 970 (Real Estate—General) under US GAAP for specialized real estate accounting guidance.
• “Real Estate Investment Trusts: A Global Analysis” by David Parker.
• Chapter 3.1 on Balance Sheet Classification.
• Chapter 6.2 on Depreciation, Amortization, and Asset Impairment.
• Chapter 7 on Lease Accounting, Pensions, and Financing Structures.
• Chapter 13 on Ratio Analysis and DuPont.
• If the CFA exam question asks you to compare a REIT under the cost model vs. the fair value model—recognize the potential differences in reported net income, equity, and key ratios.
• Be prepared to adjust for depreciation if the REIT uses the cost model, especially if property values likely increased in reality.
• When you see “FFO” or “AFFO” in a question, confirm whether the REIT’s definition of these measures lines up with standard industry definitions.
• Watch for subtle references to intangible items like tenant relationships or brand recognition. While typically overshadowed by the hard assets, they can matter.
• Time management: The exam still wants clear, concise explanations. Don’t get stuck in the minutiae of property appraisals.
Now, let’s reinforce your knowledge with a set of interactive questions!
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.