Learn how to handle and evaluate inventory write-downs, write-offs, and reversals under both IFRS and US GAAP, and understand their impact on financial statements and performance analysis.
There’s an old saying in the retail business: “Bad inventory is like a hole in your boat.” You might not notice the damage for a while, but sooner or later, that hole starts to sink the ship. If you’ve ever managed a warehouse or even tried to sell personal items online, you’ve probably felt the pain of that leftover (and unsellable) stock. In Financial Statement Analysis, we capture that “pain” through inventory write-downs, write-offs, and, under certain accounting standards, reversals.
In this section, we’ll walk through the mechanics and implications of reducing inventory from its recorded (or “carrying”) amount to a new, lower value—sometimes down to zero—and, in rare cases, bringing it back up again. We’ll cover the main differences between IFRS and US GAAP, explore best practices, highlight potential pitfalls, and provide real-life examples to illustrate how this accounting process can significantly affect a company’s bottom line.
Inventory is initially recorded at cost—this might be the purchase price, conversion costs, and any other directly attributable expenses needed to get the inventory ready for sale. Over time, if the market changes or the items become obsolete, that initial cost may no longer reflect reality. Let’s remind ourselves of a few basics from earlier in this chapter (particularly Section 5.1 “Inventory Measurement and Valuation”):
• Under IFRS (IAS 2), inventory is valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value (NRV).
• Under US GAAP (ASC 330), inventory is often valued at lower of cost or market, with market defined in a manner similar to replacement cost (although it’s typically constrained by NRV ceilings and floors).
Regardless of whether you’re under IFRS or US GAAP, if inventory’s value to the business (the amount it can be sold for, net of finishing and selling costs) drops below the recorded cost, you have an impairment situation.
A write-down is a partial reduction in the carrying amount of inventory. Think of it like a discount in your accounting records. You realize, “Well, I can only sell these gadgets for $5 each, but I’ve been carrying them at $10 on the books.” So you reduce that $10 carrying amount to, say, $5 or $4, depending on what you think you’ll recover (net of selling costs).
• Typically recognized as an expense (“Loss on inventory write-down”) on the Income Statement.
• Reduces your reported net income in the period of the write-down.
• Also reduces inventory on the Balance Sheet.
This partial loss in value can happen for many reasons: changes in consumer trends (remember when everyone rushed for fidget spinners?), new technology rendering your product outdated, or even poor forecasting of demand.
A write-off is essentially the “no going back” scenario for your inventory. It’s when you remove the asset from your books because it has zero future value. For example, maybe the entire batch of bananas in your grocery store warehouse rotted, or your high-tech microchips became completely obsolete thanks to a superior competitor product. If a write-down is a cautionary step (reducing value), a write-off is the final recognition that there’s absolutely no salvage value left.
From an accounting perspective, a write-off can look like a “100% write-down,” but practically speaking, it signals that management has completely given up on selling or even using the inventory. This also hits the Income Statement as an expense.
Under IFRS, if circumstances change and previously impaired inventory regains its value—maybe a supply shortage suddenly makes your old stock valuable again—then you’re allowed to reverse that earlier write-down. This typically cannot exceed the original carrying amount of the inventory before impairment.
Under US GAAP, such reversals are not permitted. Once you’ve taken an impairment, you can’t write inventory back up. This difference often surprises folks new to cross-border financial statement analysis and can cause comparability issues, especially for companies that adopt IFRS in markets where product prices can rebound significantly.
Here’s a simple flow diagram that captures the process:
flowchart LR A["Carrying Amount of Inventory"] --> B{"Is NRV < Carrying Amount?"} B -- Yes --> C["Write-Down (Loss recognized)"] B -- No --> D["No Action (Inventory remains at cost/NRV)"] C -- IFRS? --> E["If NRV recovers <br/> in future, Reverse (up to original cost)"] C -- US GAAP? --> F["No Reversal Allowed"]
• Physical Deterioration: Perishable goods like food and beverages have a limited shelf life.
• Obsolescence: Technology evolves. A cool gadget from two years ago might be a relic today.
• Market Price Declines: Commodity price drops or expensive competitor offerings might drive down the net realizable value.
• Overestimation of Demand: If you thought you’d sell 10,000 units but only sold 4,000, you may be stuck with inventory that’s gathering dust.
• Damaged Goods: Anything from poor handling to accidental spills can render inventory unusable.
From a management perspective, frequent write-downs can be an indicator of sloppy inventory management or poor demand forecasting. As an analyst, it’s worth paying attention if you see recurring write-downs over several quarters. There’s no shame in the occasional realignment for market changes, but repeated large impairments might raise red flags about operational efficiency or the reliability of management’s forward-looking statements.
Given these differences, IFRS statements can show inventory as an asset with a somewhat bounce-back effect if market conditions improve. US GAAP statements, however, follow a one-way street. For comparability, especially if you’re analyzing two global companies side by side, be sure to keep a keen eye on these rules.
If you’ve spent hours analyzing profit margins and then the company announces a massive write-down—boom, net income plunges. This can affect all sorts of ratios, from gross margin to net profit margin, and might even violate certain debt covenants if it’s large enough.
Write-downs decrease current assets, which can have knock-on effects for current ratios and quick ratios. A company with borderline liquidity might find itself in a tougher spot after booking a big impairment.
Frequent or large write-downs call into question the reliability of management’s estimates. Sure, sometimes unforeseen circumstances happen (like a global pandemic shutting off supply chains), but repeated episodes of overvalued or obsolete inventory can suggest that a company or industry is in persistent trouble—or that management is using these adjustments to smooth earnings in certain periods.
• Timing: Are write-downs recorded at unusual times (e.g., right before a merger or management change)?
• Magnitude: Is the size of the write-down unusually large compared to comparable firms?
• Frequency: Are write-downs happening quarter after quarter?
• Reversals Under IFRS: Is the company reversing write-downs frequently? Investigate how the new NRV was determined.
Let’s say you’re analyzing a consumer electronics company called “TechNova.” Last year, TechNova introduced a new tablet, expecting it to become the market leader. They produced 50,000 units, but it turned out nobody liked the design. Now they’re stuck with 30,000 tablets in backstock. The original cost per tablet was $180, so the total cost is $5.4 million. Suddenly, TechNova realizes it can only sell these at $100 each (net of shipping and marketing). So, the net realizable value is $3 million (30,000 × $100).
• If they value the inventory at cost ($5.4M), that’s clearly overstated.
• Under both IFRS and US GAAP, they’d need to reduce inventory to $3M and record a $2.4M loss ($5.4M − $3M).
In the next quarter, imagine that TechNova partners with a streaming company to preload software on those tablets, and it’s able to sell them for $120 each. Now, under IFRS, TechNova might be allowed to reverse part of the write-down if the new net realizable value is indeed reliable. Let’s say the reversal can’t exceed the original cost, so TechNova can’t exceed $180 per tablet. In this scenario:
Under US GAAP, there’d be no such party. Once you’ve recognized that $2.4M loss, you cannot reverse any of it. TechNova’s inventory stays at $3M.
I remember a time early in my career when we had to write down a massive batch of electronic toys that were, let’s say, not as popular as the marketing team had forecast. We’d produced way beyond actual demand, and these items just sat in our warehouse collecting dust. I spent hours preparing the justification for management, breaking the bad news that we’d have to record a multimillion-dollar loss. Of course, I was nervous—I knew how it would look on our quarterly earnings.
But you know what? Sometimes transparency and a clear explanation of the root causes can actually build investor trust. We walked our shareholders through the demand mismatch and the steps we were taking to avoid similar mistakes in the future. After all the gloom around the write-down, we ended up reinforcing confidence by showing that we recognized our errors and were willing to correct them ahead of time.
Below is a concise numeric example demonstrating the impact of a write-down under US GAAP vs. IFRS (assuming a possible future reversal for IFRS):
Day 1: Original Cost | Day 60: Revaluation | Day 180: Reversal (IFRS) | |
---|---|---|---|
Inventory (units) | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Cost per unit | $50 | – | – |
Total cost | $50,000 | – | – |
NRV per unit | – | $40 | $45 |
Carrying Value | $50,000 | $40,000 | $45,000 (IFRS only) |
Write-Down | – | $10,000 | – |
Write-Down Reversal | – | – | $5,000 (IFRS only) |
Final NRV recognized | – | $40,000 | $45,000 (IFRS only) |
Observations:
• Gross Margin: Write-downs are often included in Cost of Goods Sold (COGS). Thus, the gross margin can drop significantly during the period of the impairment.
• Inventory Turnover: If you reduce average inventory, the turnover ratio might artificially appear more favorable. It’s important to examine footnotes to see if a big write-down impacted these calculations.
• Current Ratio (Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities): Because current assets decrease after a write-down, the current ratio declines.
• Debt Covenants and Loan Agreements: Sudden drops in net income and changes in key ratios can put a company in breach of certain lending covenants.
As you prepare for the CFA exam, keep in mind:
• Cross-Comparisons: Be ready to identify how IFRS vs. US GAAP differences in inventory reversals can affect ratio analysis.
• Scenario Applications: Contextual clues in item-set vignettes might point you to ongoing operational issues.
• Written Responses: In short-answer or essay-style questions, highlight both immediate accounting impacts and broader implications for financial analysis.
• Time Management: When you see complex scenarios involving inventory valuation, streamline your approach by focusing on the key difference: IFRS might allow reversals, GAAP won’t.
Inventory write-downs, write-offs, and reversals might sound like technical inconveniences, but they have real ramifications for a company’s reported performance and financial health. They offer insights into operational efficiency, management forecasting capabilities, and potential red flags for analysts on the lookout for earnings manipulation. By carefully understanding (1) how these adjustments arise, (2) why the differences exist between IFRS and US GAAP, and (3) how to interpret them when performing ratio analysis, you’ll be better equipped to evaluate a company’s true economic picture. After all, we never want to ignore that potential hole in the boat.
• International Accounting Standard (IAS) 2: Inventories
• US GAAP (ASC 330) on Inventory
• CFA Institute, “Financial Reporting and Analysis,” Official Curriculum
• “Interpretation and Application of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” by Wiley
• For a closer look at advanced inventory management systems, see our discussion in Chapter 16 on data analytics in forecasting.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.