A detailed exploration of how companies disclose their inventory methods, amounts, and assumptions, along with key considerations for effective financial statement analysis.
When you pop open a company’s financial statements—especially if you’re just casually skimming—you might be tempted to skip all those dense notes at the back. But, um, if we talk about inventory, those footnotes are actually gold. The footnotes to financial statements reveal vital data on how a firm values its inventory, any adjustments (like write-downs or reversals), and the breakdown of inventory categories (raw materials, work in process, finished goods). All these details can significantly affect ratio analysis, earnings quality, and your overall opinion on the firm’s financial health.
Below, we’ll explore what’s commonly disclosed, how to interpret it, and why it matters for an analyst looking to dig deeper into the reality behind the numbers. We’ll also toss in a few real-life tidbits, some best practices for analysis, and a short discussion of IFRS vs. US GAAP differences for completeness.
Companies typically state whether they use FIFO (First-In, First-Out), LIFO (Last-In, First-Out), weighted average cost, or specific identification. They also mention if different product lines are valued under different methods. For instance, it’s not unusual for a company to use:
• LIFO for a stable commodity with rising prices, potentially lowering reported taxable income under US GAAP.
• FIFO for perishable goods or a separate product line.
Under IFRS (IAS 2), LIFO isn’t permitted. That’s already a big difference from US GAAP, where LIFO is still allowed (though less common internationally). Seeing a shift from LIFO to FIFO could meaningfully increase or decrease reported inventory values.
Footnotes also reveal the amount of any inventory write-down recognized during the period—plus the reasons behind it. Maybe there was an unexpected drop in market prices or some obsolescence that management discovered. Under IFRS, companies can reverse write-downs if the market recovers and certain conditions are met. Meanwhile, under US GAAP, once you write down inventory, you typically can’t reverse it.
It’s crucial to examine these disclosures. A large or recurring inventory write-down might indicate a pattern—perhaps your firm is consistently overestimating demand or it’s losing track of older product lines. And if the company keeps reversing write-downs in subsequent periods under IFRS, you might wonder if management is playing games with timing.
The footnotes generally break out inventory into:
• Raw Materials (RM)
• Work-in-Process (WIP)
• Finished Goods (FG)
Seeing a big jump in WIP might indicate that production is ramping up (good sign) or that there are operational bottlenecks (less good). A large portion of finished goods could mean the company is all set for a big holiday season push—or it might mean demand is faltering, and the firm is stuck with unsold stock. Reading this classification year-over-year can really illuminate a company’s operational trends.
Multinational or multi-line businesses often give a more granular perspective: how much inventory each division or region holds, whether segments rely on different valuation methods, or if certain regions have disproportionate write-downs. If, say, an electronics segment consistently posts higher write-downs than a furniture segment, that might confirm that the electronics side is more prone to obsolescence.
Footnotes often touch on management’s estimates, like anticipated selling prices, expected costs of completion, or how quickly inventory will sell. These assumptions feed directly into calculations for net realizable value (NRV). You want to look for any changes in assumptions, especially if they significantly shift the carrying value of inventory from one period to the next.
Inventory is a huge asset for manufacturing and retail firms. If it’s overstated, the company’s profitability might look artificially high. If it’s understated (due to a big LIFO reserve, for example), the profitability might appear lower than comparable peer firms. You’ll see the effect on:
• Gross Margin and hence Net Income
• Inventory Turnover (COGS / Average Inventory)
• Days Inventory on Hand
A sudden shift in inventory valuation assumptions can distort these metrics. That’s why each one of these disclosures is like a puzzle piece that helps you see the bigger picture.
Footnotes show you changes in inventory accounting policies—maybe they switched from FIFO to weighted average, or changed the approach they use to estimate obsolescence. By reading the details, you can restate historical data or at least note the difference so you can do an apples-to-apples comparison. For instance, if a change from LIFO to FIFO artificially boosted reported net income, you’ll know to watch out for an inflated performance trend.
• Frequent manipulation or reversing of inventory write-downs under IFRS.
• Substantial changes to inventory valuation policies without transparent justification.
• Sudden decline in inventory turnover that conflicts with management’s positivity in earnings calls.
Below is a simple Mermaid diagram illustrating how inventories progress from raw materials to finished goods—and the branching step where a write-down or reversal can occur:
This might seem straightforward, but each of these steps can be profoundly influenced by the valuation method, demand assumptions, and corporate policies spelled out in the footnotes.
Comparability is key. When reading footnotes, ask yourself:
• Has the firm consistently used the same valuation method across periods?
• Why did any changes occur, and how did that affect net income or retained earnings?
• Are the percentages of RM, WIP, and FG in line with industry peers? If not, is there a valid explanation?
For instance, I once bumped into a manufacturing firm that disclosed a big jump in finished goods inventory in Q4 and attributed it to strong seasonal demand. Yet, in the audited annual report, the footnotes revealed actual Q1 sales were slow, leaving them with unsold stock. They had to discount heavily to clear goods in Q2, which hammered their margins. Had you not read the footnotes, you’d have missed that early sign.
If you’re feeling adventurous, you might parse a company’s footnote disclosures automatically from XBRL data. Here’s a very simplified snippet showing how one could read in a CSV file containing footnote tags for an “InventoryDisclosure” item. Obviously, in the real world, footnote parsing is more complicated, but this snippet offers a tiny taste of how you might get started automating data collection:
1import csv
2
3footnotes_data = []
4with open('inventory_footnotes.csv', 'r') as f:
5 reader = csv.DictReader(f)
6 for row in reader:
7 if 'InventoryDisclosure' in row['concept']:
8 footnotes_data.append(row['value'])
9
10for note in footnotes_data:
11 print(note)
Maybe it’s nerdy, but such automation can save a lot of time if you’re analyzing multiple companies.
It’s smart to compare the disclosed information with typical industry expectations. For example:
• High-end fashion might require bigger obsolescence reserves because trends shift so quickly.
• Commodity-driven industries might see more consistent inventory turnover but also higher sensitivity to price fluctuations.
• Tech hardware might show quick inventory turnover but also frequent write-downs for older models.
Feel free to do a peer comparison by reading competing firms’ footnotes. If a competitor’s footnotes detail less variation in write-downs, but your firm’s footnotes show large swings, that could prompt further investigation.
• IFRS (IAS 2) disallows LIFO, while US GAAP permits it.
• IFRS allows for a reversal of an inventory write-down if subsequent conditions warrant it; US GAAP does not.
• Under both systems, you’ll see footnotes that outline the chosen cost formula and any changes in policy.
These differences can lead to significantly different inventory values and cost of goods sold (COGS), so a simple cross-jurisdiction note in the footnotes can have big performance implications.
In a CFA exam context, especially if you’re facing item set questions involving inventories, keep these points in mind:
• Footnote Disclosures: Expect a question about analyzing changes in policies or how a write-down affects the financial statements.
• Impact on Ratios: You might be asked to recast a firm’s ratios under a different valuation method or to assess how a write-down or reversal influences gross margin.
• Comparability: A typical question might show two firms—one using LIFO, another using FIFO—and ask which adjustments are needed to make a valid comparison.
And a final bit of exam-day advice: read not just the main body of the financial statements but also any additional notes, particularly those referencing inventory. The understated details in the footnotes often carry the big “Aha!” moments that the exam might want you to catch.
• White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (2020). Analysis of Financial Statements.
• PCAOB guidance on inventory and related disclosures: https://pcaobus.org/
• IAS 2, Inventories, IFRS Consolidated without early application (Your IFRS standards library)
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.