Comprehensive coverage of IFRS 5 and ASC 205-20 guidance on Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. Explore classification criteria, measurement implications, analytical considerations, and how discontinued operations impact financial statements and valuation.
So, I’ll start with a quick personal memory: early on in my career, I remember flipping through a set of consolidated financials where a large consumer goods manufacturer announced that it was selling off its entire snack-food division. At first, I was like, “Wait…didn’t they just acquire that division two years ago?” It turned out the subsidiary was consistently incurring losses. The parent decided it was better off as an asset held for sale—and soon enough, the entire operation was reclassified as a discontinued operation. That single reclassification significantly changed the way the financial statements looked, and it also had a telling effect on crucial metrics like return on assets and operating margins.
Now, this scenario might be surprisingly common for those of us deeply involved in financial statement analysis. That’s why IFRS 5 (Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations) and ASC 205-20 (Presentation of Financial Statements — Discontinued Operations) exist: to ensure consistent reporting and clarity for both preparers and users of financial statements. Let’s walk through the major concepts you need to know.
At the heart of it, both IFRS 5 and ASC 205-20 revolve around identifying which assets (or groups of assets) a company is planning to sell or dispose of, and separately reporting any operations that are, so to speak, on their way out the door. It’s not just about labeling them differently—a whole new measurement requirement kicks in once an asset or group of assets is classified as “held for sale.”
• Under IFRS 5, an asset held for sale must be available for immediate sale in its present condition and the sale should be highly probable within one year.
• Under ASC 205-20, US GAAP echoes this idea, emphasizing that the disposition is imminent and that management must be actively seeking a buyer.
Reporting under these standards typically affects two major areas:
A non-current asset or disposal group (collection of assets and liabilities to be sold together) is classified as “held for sale” if two primary conditions are met:
• Management is committed to a plan to sell the asset (or disposal group).
• The asset is available for immediate sale, and completion of the sale is probable within a year.
One of my colleagues—who used to be a corporate controller—once said, “Classifying an asset as held for sale is pretty serious business. You can’t just throw it in that bucket if you’re not actively talking to buyers or don’t have a real plan.” And that’s exactly the idea behind IFRS 5 and ASC 205-20. Both standards require robust evidence that the company is fully engaged in the disposal process.
When an asset qualifies for classification as held for sale, it must be measured at the lower of:
• Its carrying amount on the books (original cost minus accumulated depreciation and impairment, if any), or
• Fair value less any costs to sell.
If the fair value less costs to sell is lower, the company writes down the asset in the period the reclassification occurs. This ensures the balance sheet reflects the asset’s recoverable amount as if the sale were to happen imminently. Any subsequent increases in fair value can be recognized to the extent they reverse previously recognized losses (under IFRS, with certain limitations; under US GAAP, typically no reversal after being written down, though the specific treatments can vary in some circumstances).
Below is a simplified flowchart illustrating the classification and measurement approach:
flowchart LR A["Assess if Sale is Highly Probable <br/> (IFRS 5 / ASC 205-20)"] B["Ensure Active Program <br/> to Locate Buyer"] C["Sale Completion within ~1 Year?"] D["Classify Asset as Held for Sale <br/> at Lower of: <br/>Carrying Amt or (FV - Costs to Sell)"] A --> B B --> C C --> D
So, if your question is “When does the accounting change from normal depreciation to an immediate write-down if needed?” the chart above is your quick guide.
Discontinued operations are often the “headline-grabbers.” Whenever you hear, “Company X to spin off its entire consumer electronics division,” that’s probably going to be presented as a discontinued operation. The gist: a discontinued operation is a component of an entity that has either been disposed of or classified as held for sale and that represents a major line of business or a geographical segment.
On the income statement, discontinued operations are normally presented separately, below income from continuing operations. The results are shown net of tax. This separation distinctly highlights the performance of the part of the business that is no longer central to ongoing operations. From an analyst’s point of view, this can drastically change our understanding of “core” profitability and comparisons across periods.
Let’s say a global automobile manufacturer decides to sell off its entire truck division. If the truck division qualifies as a major line of business, that portion of revenue, expenses, assets, and liabilities must be carved out and placed into the discontinued operations line items. This classification helps us (the analysts, that is) better see the ongoing business dynamics for passenger vehicles separately from the truck operation that’s heading out.
Assets (and sometimes related liabilities) reclassified as held for sale are no longer depreciated or amortized. Instead, you adjust them to the lower of carrying value or fair value minus costs to sell. The immediate effect is often a downward valuation, which can reduce total assets and equity—depending on the size of the impairment recognized.
Additionally, assets held for sale and liabilities associated with those assets are shown separately on the balance sheet. This makes them visually “stand out,” so you can quickly identify them in your analysis.
Once reclassified, you remove all income and expenses associated with that division (or asset) from continuing operations going forward. Any gains or losses on measurement or eventual disposal of the discontinued operation also appear in the discontinued operations section of the income statement. This separation arguably makes the statement more transparent by isolating past operations that no longer represent the firm’s future direction.
Here’s a situation that used to trip me up a bit: ratio analysis can become tricky when you remove revenues, expenses, and assets from continuing operations. For instance, profitability ratios (like net margin or return on equity) might suddenly look better or worse once the discontinued segment’s results are stripped out. Liquidity ratios and leverage ratios can also shift if large assets (and liabilities) vanish from the balance sheet.
Analysts must remain cautious when comparing historical performance before and after the reclassification. Typically, you’d look for restated prior-period numbers that reflect the segment as discontinued so that your year-over-year or quarter-over-quarter comparisons remain consistent.
Repeated classification of different segments as discontinued operations might hint at broader strategic realignment or a big push to exit unprofitable lines. While this can be a positive for future profitability, it might also signal that management’s initial strategy missed the mark, prompting frequent restructuring. I remember encountering a retail company that had announced “discontinuation” of four different store concepts over three consecutive years. Investors naturally started asking, “When are you guys going to settle on a winning strategy?”
Imagine a manufacturing facility on the books for a carrying amount of $5 million. Management commits to sell that facility within six months, and the current fair value for industrial properties like this is estimated at $4.2 million. But the company expects to pay $0.2 million in broker commissions and legal fees. Thus:
Fair Value = $4.2 million
Less Costs to Sell = $0.2 million
Net = $4.0 million
Since $4.0 million is below the carrying amount of $5 million, the asset is written down by $1 million. The company recognizes a $1 million loss in the period it classifies the facility as held for sale. That’s a big direct impact on the income statement (or specifically, in discontinued operations if that facility is a major part of the business under disposal).
Suppose a consumer electronics company decides to cease production of its e-reader line—one that’s well known but underperforming. If that e-reader division constituted a major revenue source, it would likely meet the definition of a discontinued operation. All associated revenues and expenses for the e-reader segment get reported separately in the company’s upcoming financial statements, net of tax. This often provides clarity to investors concerning the performance of the continuing lines—maybe smartphones and tablets.
• Past essay questions often present financial statements before and after an asset reclassification. They might ask you to recalculate ratios or comment on the quality of earnings.
• Item set questions might give you footnote disclosures about future disposal or an ongoing plan to sell a segment. They may ask whether the disposal is truly probable within 12 months (or question if certain conditions are met).
• You might be asked to determine the correct measurement approach for an asset once it meets the held-for-sale criteria.
• Read footnotes carefully. IFRS 5 and ASC 205-20 demand that companies explain the reasons for a classification and the expected timeframe for completion.
• Verify that public documents (e.g., 10-Ks, MD&A sections) provide details about negotiations, the stage of disposal, etc.
• Check for consistency between management’s statements (e.g., in earnings calls and press releases) and the financial statement disclosures.
• Look for big gains or losses disclosed separately in discontinued operations. If they recur, try to determine whether they represent transitory items or indicate ongoing structural weaknesses.
• IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations:
https://www.ifrs.org
• FASB ASC 205-20 — Discontinued Operations:
https://fasb.org/
• Revsine, Collins, Johnson: “Financial Reporting and Analysis” (chapters on restructuring and discontinued operations)
• CFA Institute Program Curriculum, Level 1, “Financial Reporting and Analysis”
Remember, knowing the standard is just part of the story: truly understanding how these classifications affect analysis and forecasting is what sets skilled analysts apart from the crowd.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.