A thorough exploration of Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) versus Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE), focusing on key formulas, valuation methodologies, and real-world applications.
If there’s one topic in equity analysis that has caused more face-palms than I can count, it’s the distinction between Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) and Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE). Early in my career, I remember mixing them up for a client project and thinking, “Oh man, can I just blame the spreadsheet?” But let’s be real—this difference is fundamental, and it’s well worth mastering. In simple terms:
• FCFF is the cash flow that’s available to all providers of capital (both equity holders and debtholders).
• FCFE, on the other hand, is what’s left for the equity holders after we account for costs of debt and net borrowing.
You can think of FCFF as describing how much value the entire enterprise generates without distinguishing who financed its operations. Meanwhile, FCFE zones in on the portion of cash flows that belongs only to shareholders. Understanding each measure is essential for picking the right approach to valuation given a company’s capital structure and the purpose of your analysis.
Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) represents the cash flow a company produces after funding all operating expenses, taxes (excluding interest’s tax impact), and investments in fixed and working capital, but before any debt-related cash flows. In other words, FCFF is the pot of gold that can be distributed to everyone—lenders and owners alike—if we wanted to. It’s the source for:
• Repayment of principal on debt
• Payment of interest on debt
• Distribution of dividends to shareholders
• Potential share repurchases
Because FCFF is available to all capital providers, it must be discounted at the firm’s Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC).
Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE) is the cash that remains after a company has met all its operational and capital spending obligations, paid interest and principal (when due), and accounted for net changes in borrowing. Thus, FCFE looks at the leftover cash for equity holders only. This leftover is then discounted at the cost of equity (rᵉ).
If you’ve ever tried to forecast FCFE in a firm that’s constantly refinancing or changing its debt load, you’ll know it can be a bit more, shall we say, “game-like.” Every new borrowing or repayment influences FCFE. That’s precisely why some analysts switch to FCFF if they suspect big shifts in capital structure are ahead.
The classic formula for FCFF—starting from Net Income (NI)—often looks like this:
Where:
• NI = Net Income
• NCC = Non-cash charges (e.g., depreciation, amortization)
• Int = Interest expense
• T = Corporate tax rate
• FCInv = Investments in fixed capital (capital expenditures)
• WCInv = Investments in working capital (net change in working capital)
The interest expense is added back net of taxes to reflect that FCFF should measure cash flows before financing costs are allocated.
You could also start from EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes), EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization), or CFO (Cash Flow from Operations). The result is consistently the firm’s pre-financing free cash flow, but each method requires its own adjustments.
Now let’s talk FCFE. A common formula—starting from Net Income—goes like this:
Where “Net Borrowing” is new debt issued minus debt repaid during the period. Notice we do not add back interest expense here because it’s already accounted for in Net Income. Instead, net borrowing captures the additional funding from debt that either inflates or reduces the pool of equity cash flows.
Alternatively, you can compute FCFE in a pinch if you already have FCFF:
This essentially subtracts out the after-tax interest cost plus or minus any changes in debt.
Why do we fuss over these two measures? Let’s lay them out in a short table for quick clarity:
Aspect | FCFF | FCFE |
---|---|---|
Definition | Cash flow to all capital providers | Cash flow after debt expenses/issuances for equity |
Discount Rate | WACC | Cost of equity (rᵉ) |
Leverage Impact | Less relevant (pre-financing) | Directly impacted (post-financing) |
Usage in Valuation | Enterprise value | Equity value |
Complexity with Changing Debt | Usually simpler to forecast | Can become cumbersome to forecast with major debt changes |
In a stable world, both measures give you a handle on value. But your vantage point differs: FCFF tells you, “Hey, how much is the entire business worth, irrespective of how it’s financed?” FCFE homes in on, “What’s in it for the shareholders, once we pay the bills related to debt?”
Capital structure is like the DNA of a company’s finances. A firm’s debt-to-equity mix can change the relationship between FCFF and FCFE:
• If a firm ramps up its debt financing:
– FCFE may jump, especially if net borrowing is substantial.
– FCFF might not change that much, because FCFF is calculated before interest and principal payments.
• If a firm chooses to pay down debt:
– FCFE might take a hit if that cash has to go toward net debt repayment.
– FCFF again stays relatively neutral to changes in leverage.
As a result, if you’re analyzing a firm on the cusp of a major leverage shift—maybe a leveraged buyout or big capital restructuring—FCFF is often your friend. FCFE forecasting becomes more difficult, especially if the analyst has to project future interest expenses, principal repayments, and the timing of net borrowings.
Since FCFF measures cash flows owed to all providers of capital, you discount FCFF at the firm’s WACC. The present value of forecasted FCFF, minus net debt, gives you an estimate of equity value. Or equivalently, the present value of FCFF simply yields the enterprise value, from which you can subtract the market value of debt to arrive at equity.
FCFE is typically discounted at the cost of equity (rᵉ). This approach yields an estimate of equity value directly, since you’re capturing the cash flows available only to the owners themselves. In stable debt environments with no large changes in capital structure, FCFE can be a more direct route to equity valuation.
• Watch those interest expense adjustments. Forgetting to add back interest net of tax in FCFF calculations leads to an overstatement or understatement of free cash flow.
• Keep track of net working capital changes. Movement in items like receivables, payables, or inventories can significantly alter your final free cash flow numbers.
• Be consistent with how you treat capital expenditures (FCInv). If you include the intangible spending in one place, don’t forget it somewhere else.
• For FCFE, accurately account for net borrowing—especially if the firm is paying down debt or issuing new short-term or long-term debt.
• Remember, your choice of discount rate must align with your measure of cash flow. FCFF → WACC. FCFE → cost of equity (rᵉ).
Let’s do a quick numeric example. Suppose a firm’s Net Income is $100, depreciation is $20, interest expense is $10, the tax rate is 25%, capital expenditures are $30, net working capital increases by $5, and net new debt issuance is $15.
• FCFF from net income perspective:
So FCFF = 100 + 20 + 7.5 – 30 – 5 = $92.5
• FCFE from net income perspective:
So FCFE = 100 + 20 – 30 – 5 + 15 = $100
In this example, FCFE ($100) is higher than FCFF ($92.5). Why? Because the company issued $15 of net new debt, effectively boosting the amount of cash available to equity holders.
Below is a simple flowchart summarizing the step-by-step components of FCFF versus FCFE:
flowchart TB A["EBIT"] --> B["Less: Taxes on EBIT"] B --> C["Add: Non-Cash Charges (Depr., Amort.)"] C --> D["Less: CapEx & WCInv"] D --> E["= FCFF"] E --> F["Less: Int*(1 - T)"] F --> G["Add: Net Borrowing"] G --> H["= FCFE"]
Note that taxes related to interest expense are accounted for differently in each measure. For FCFF, you add interest net of taxes back in; for FCFE, you’ve already captured interest in net income, so you mainly track net borrowing.
• Read Vignettes Carefully: They love hiding details about net borrowings, interest, or capital structure changes in footnotes. If you see big changes in the debt schedule, consider whether FCFF might be the more straightforward approach.
• Use the Right Discount Rate: Don’t forget that mismatch between FCFF (use WACC) and FCFE (use cost of equity) is a frequent exam pitfall.
• Check for Non-Recurring Items: If the question states a one-time expense or gain, decide whether it belongs in free cash flow forecasts. Non-operating or extraordinary items might need special treatment.
• Tidy Up the Math: Little mistakes add up quickly when working out free cash flows. Double-check your interest net-of-tax calculations, depreciation adjustments, and net borrowing lines.
• CFA Institute Level II Curriculum, Equity Valuation (FCFF and FCFE sections)
• Aswath Damodaran, “Damodaran on Valuation,” 2nd edition
• McKinsey & Company, “Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies”
• SSRN Paper: “Estimating Free Cash Flows” (for deeper methodology)
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.