Browse CFA Level 2

FCFF vs. FCFE: Concepts and Differences

A thorough exploration of Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) versus Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE), focusing on key formulas, valuation methodologies, and real-world applications.

Understanding FCFF and FCFE

If there’s one topic in equity analysis that has caused more face-palms than I can count, it’s the distinction between Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) and Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE). Early in my career, I remember mixing them up for a client project and thinking, “Oh man, can I just blame the spreadsheet?” But let’s be real—this difference is fundamental, and it’s well worth mastering. In simple terms:

• FCFF is the cash flow that’s available to all providers of capital (both equity holders and debtholders).
• FCFE, on the other hand, is what’s left for the equity holders after we account for costs of debt and net borrowing.

You can think of FCFF as describing how much value the entire enterprise generates without distinguishing who financed its operations. Meanwhile, FCFE zones in on the portion of cash flows that belongs only to shareholders. Understanding each measure is essential for picking the right approach to valuation given a company’s capital structure and the purpose of your analysis.

Conceptual Overview

What Is FCFF?

Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) represents the cash flow a company produces after funding all operating expenses, taxes (excluding interest’s tax impact), and investments in fixed and working capital, but before any debt-related cash flows. In other words, FCFF is the pot of gold that can be distributed to everyone—lenders and owners alike—if we wanted to. It’s the source for:

• Repayment of principal on debt
• Payment of interest on debt
• Distribution of dividends to shareholders
• Potential share repurchases

Because FCFF is available to all capital providers, it must be discounted at the firm’s Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC).

What Is FCFE?

Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE) is the cash that remains after a company has met all its operational and capital spending obligations, paid interest and principal (when due), and accounted for net changes in borrowing. Thus, FCFE looks at the leftover cash for equity holders only. This leftover is then discounted at the cost of equity (rᵉ).

If you’ve ever tried to forecast FCFE in a firm that’s constantly refinancing or changing its debt load, you’ll know it can be a bit more, shall we say, “game-like.” Every new borrowing or repayment influences FCFE. That’s precisely why some analysts switch to FCFF if they suspect big shifts in capital structure are ahead.

Calculation Approaches

Computing FCFF

The classic formula for FCFF—starting from Net Income (NI)—often looks like this:

$$ \text{FCFF} = \text{NI} + \text{NCC} + \text{Int} \times (1 - T) - \text{FCInv} - \text{WCInv} $$

Where: • NI = Net Income
• NCC = Non-cash charges (e.g., depreciation, amortization)
• Int = Interest expense
• T = Corporate tax rate
• FCInv = Investments in fixed capital (capital expenditures)
• WCInv = Investments in working capital (net change in working capital)

The interest expense is added back net of taxes to reflect that FCFF should measure cash flows before financing costs are allocated.

You could also start from EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes), EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization), or CFO (Cash Flow from Operations). The result is consistently the firm’s pre-financing free cash flow, but each method requires its own adjustments.

Computing FCFE

Now let’s talk FCFE. A common formula—starting from Net Income—goes like this:

$$ \text{FCFE} = \text{NI} + \text{NCC} - \text{FCInv} - \text{WCInv} + \text{Net Borrowing} $$

Where “Net Borrowing” is new debt issued minus debt repaid during the period. Notice we do not add back interest expense here because it’s already accounted for in Net Income. Instead, net borrowing captures the additional funding from debt that either inflates or reduces the pool of equity cash flows.

Alternatively, you can compute FCFE in a pinch if you already have FCFF:

$$ \text{FCFE} = \text{FCFF} - \text{Int} \times (1 - T) + \text{Net Borrowing} $$

This essentially subtracts out the after-tax interest cost plus or minus any changes in debt.

Key Differences

Why do we fuss over these two measures? Let’s lay them out in a short table for quick clarity:

Aspect FCFF FCFE
Definition Cash flow to all capital providers Cash flow after debt expenses/issuances for equity
Discount Rate WACC Cost of equity (rᵉ)
Leverage Impact Less relevant (pre-financing) Directly impacted (post-financing)
Usage in Valuation Enterprise value Equity value
Complexity with Changing Debt Usually simpler to forecast Can become cumbersome to forecast with major debt changes

In a stable world, both measures give you a handle on value. But your vantage point differs: FCFF tells you, “Hey, how much is the entire business worth, irrespective of how it’s financed?” FCFE homes in on, “What’s in it for the shareholders, once we pay the bills related to debt?”

Capital Structure Implications

Capital structure is like the DNA of a company’s finances. A firm’s debt-to-equity mix can change the relationship between FCFF and FCFE:

• If a firm ramps up its debt financing: – FCFE may jump, especially if net borrowing is substantial.
– FCFF might not change that much, because FCFF is calculated before interest and principal payments.

• If a firm chooses to pay down debt: – FCFE might take a hit if that cash has to go toward net debt repayment.
– FCFF again stays relatively neutral to changes in leverage.

As a result, if you’re analyzing a firm on the cusp of a major leverage shift—maybe a leveraged buyout or big capital restructuring—FCFF is often your friend. FCFE forecasting becomes more difficult, especially if the analyst has to project future interest expenses, principal repayments, and the timing of net borrowings.

Valuation Implications

Valuing with FCFF

Since FCFF measures cash flows owed to all providers of capital, you discount FCFF at the firm’s WACC. The present value of forecasted FCFF, minus net debt, gives you an estimate of equity value. Or equivalently, the present value of FCFF simply yields the enterprise value, from which you can subtract the market value of debt to arrive at equity.

Valuing with FCFE

FCFE is typically discounted at the cost of equity (rᵉ). This approach yields an estimate of equity value directly, since you’re capturing the cash flows available only to the owners themselves. In stable debt environments with no large changes in capital structure, FCFE can be a more direct route to equity valuation.

Best Practices and Pitfalls

• Watch those interest expense adjustments. Forgetting to add back interest net of tax in FCFF calculations leads to an overstatement or understatement of free cash flow.
• Keep track of net working capital changes. Movement in items like receivables, payables, or inventories can significantly alter your final free cash flow numbers.
• Be consistent with how you treat capital expenditures (FCInv). If you include the intangible spending in one place, don’t forget it somewhere else.
• For FCFE, accurately account for net borrowing—especially if the firm is paying down debt or issuing new short-term or long-term debt.
• Remember, your choice of discount rate must align with your measure of cash flow. FCFF → WACC. FCFE → cost of equity (rᵉ).

Quick Case Study

Let’s do a quick numeric example. Suppose a firm’s Net Income is $100, depreciation is $20, interest expense is $10, the tax rate is 25%, capital expenditures are $30, net working capital increases by $5, and net new debt issuance is $15.

• FCFF from net income perspective:

  1. Start with NI = $100
  2. Add non-cash charges (Depreciation) = $20
  3. Add back interest after tax: $10 × (1 – 0.25) = $7.5
  4. Subtract capital expenditures: $30
  5. Subtract increase in working capital: $5

So FCFF = 100 + 20 + 7.5 – 30 – 5 = $92.5

• FCFE from net income perspective:

  1. Start with NI = $100
  2. Add non-cash charges (Depreciation) = $20
  3. Subtract capital expenditures: $30
  4. Subtract increase in working capital: $5
  5. Add net new debt issuance: $15

So FCFE = 100 + 20 – 30 – 5 + 15 = $100

In this example, FCFE ($100) is higher than FCFF ($92.5). Why? Because the company issued $15 of net new debt, effectively boosting the amount of cash available to equity holders.

Mermaid Diagram

Below is a simple flowchart summarizing the step-by-step components of FCFF versus FCFE:

    flowchart TB
	    A["EBIT"] --> B["Less: Taxes on EBIT"]
	    B --> C["Add: Non-Cash Charges (Depr., Amort.)"]
	    C --> D["Less: CapEx & WCInv"]
	    D --> E["= FCFF"]
	    E --> F["Less: Int*(1 - T)"]
	    F --> G["Add: Net Borrowing"]
	    G --> H["= FCFE"]

Note that taxes related to interest expense are accounted for differently in each measure. For FCFF, you add interest net of taxes back in; for FCFE, you’ve already captured interest in net income, so you mainly track net borrowing.

Practical Tips for Exam Day

• Read Vignettes Carefully: They love hiding details about net borrowings, interest, or capital structure changes in footnotes. If you see big changes in the debt schedule, consider whether FCFF might be the more straightforward approach.
• Use the Right Discount Rate: Don’t forget that mismatch between FCFF (use WACC) and FCFE (use cost of equity) is a frequent exam pitfall.
• Check for Non-Recurring Items: If the question states a one-time expense or gain, decide whether it belongs in free cash flow forecasts. Non-operating or extraordinary items might need special treatment.
• Tidy Up the Math: Little mistakes add up quickly when working out free cash flows. Double-check your interest net-of-tax calculations, depreciation adjustments, and net borrowing lines.

References

• CFA Institute Level II Curriculum, Equity Valuation (FCFF and FCFE sections)
• Aswath Damodaran, “Damodaran on Valuation,” 2nd edition
• McKinsey & Company, “Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies”
• SSRN Paper: “Estimating Free Cash Flows” (for deeper methodology)

FCFF vs. FCFE: Test Your Knowledge

### A company’s FCFF is best discounted at: - [ ] The firm’s cost of equity. - [x] The firm’s Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). - [ ] The risk-free rate. - [ ] The firm’s dividend yield. > **Explanation:** FCFF represents cash flows available to all capital providers, so we use WACC rather than only the cost of equity to discount it. ### If Net Income equals $50, depreciation is $10, net working capital increases by $5, and net borrowing is $10, which of the following is added when calculating FCFE? - [ ] After-tax interest expense. - [ ] Extraordinary gains. - [x] Net borrowing. - [ ] Dividends paid. > **Explanation:** FCFE specifically accounts for the net borrowing of $10 because it represents the additional (or reduced) cash available to equity holders after debt financing decisions. ### How does an increase in interest expense affect FCFF (assuming all else equal)? - [ ] It increases FCFF. - [x] It decreases FCFF only by the after-tax portion of interest if initially starting from Net Income. - [ ] It has no impact if starting from EBIT. - [ ] It immediately lowers the firm’s cost of equity. > **Explanation:** Interest expense is added back net of tax when starting from Net Income to arrive at FCFF. A higher interest expense means we add back a larger after-tax interest amount, but that typically arises because Net Income was lower. ### Which statement is correct regarding capital expenditures in FCFF and FCFE calculations? - [ ] They are added back in FCFF and FCFE. - [x] They are subtracted to reflect investment in long-term assets. - [ ] They are ignored if debt-financed. - [ ] They are treated as part of depreciation. > **Explanation:** Capital expenditures (FCInv) reduce free cash flow in both computations. ### A firm expecting major leverage changes might prefer: - [ ] FCFE for simplicity. - [x] FCFF for ease of modeling. - [ ] Neither, since free cash flow is irrelevant. - [ ] Only P/E multiples. > **Explanation:** When leverage is unstable, FCFF often proves more straightforward because FCFE requires precise forecasting of changes in debt and interest payments. ### Which of the following is subtracted from FCFF to arrive at FCFE (if no other adjustments are needed)? - [x] After-tax interest expense, then adding net borrowing. - [ ] Dividends paid to preferred shareholders. - [ ] Depreciation. - [ ] Taxes paid on EBIT. > **Explanation:** Transitioning from FCFF to FCFE typically involves removing the after-tax interest portion and adding (or subtracting) net borrowing. ### In computing FCFE from net income, which of the following increases FCFE? - [x] Increased net borrowing. - [ ] Higher capital expenditures. - [x] Higher depreciation. - [ ] Higher tax rates. > **Explanation:** Net borrowing is added when calculating FCFE (increase in net borrowing raises FCFE), and higher depreciation (a non-cash charge) also boosts FCFE by reducing net income’s cash outflows. ### If a firm’s FCFF is $200, interest expense is $30, the tax rate is 25%, and net borrowing is $40, what is the firm’s FCFE? - [ ] $157.5 - [x] $187.5 - [ ] $230.0 - [ ] $270.0 > **Explanation:** FCFE = FCFF – [Int × (1 – T)] + Net Borrowing = 200 – [30 × (0.75)] + 40 = 200 – 22.5 + 40 = 217.5. Wait, that’s not among the options given, so re-check: if FCFF is $200, we remove after-tax interest of $22.5 and add net borrowing of $40. That gives $200 – $22.5 + $40 = $217.5. This discrepancy suggests a careful read. If $187.5 is an option, there might be a mismatch. Possibly the question is tricking us. Let’s see: One might re-check the net addition: –22.5 + 40 = +17.5. So $200 + 17.5 = $217.5. But $217.5 is not among the choices. The closest is $187.5, which is $30 away. The question as provided might reflect a scenario or a slight trick. If the question is correct, maybe they intended interest expense net of tax to be subtracted from $200 and no net borrowing added. However, typically from FCFF to FCFE, we do exactly that. The correct theoretical FCFE is $217.5 if net borrowing is $40, interest is $30, and T=25%. The best match to the standard formula is $217.5, but since that’s not an option, the next best might be $187.5 if net borrowing is instead negative or interest is not handled as we typically do. In a real exam setting, we’d suspect a question mismatch, but given multiple choice constraints, we might choose the figure that best fits the “subtract interest net of tax, add borrowing” logic but with a sign difference in net borrowing, or a partial detail missing. > **Explanation:** Possibly an exam quirk, but by formula, we do: 200 – (30 × 0.75) + 40 = 217.5. That’s not listed, which might be an error in the question or an attempt to test your recalculation logic. ### True or False: FCFE is not affected by new debt issuance. - [ ] True - [x] False > **Explanation:** FCFE explicitly accounts for net borrowing (new debt issued minus repayment). So, new issuance can increase FCFE. ### A firm’s cost of equity (rᵉ) is used as the discount rate for: - [ ] FCFF. - [x] FCFE. - [ ] Both FCFF and FCFE. - [ ] Dividends when using the Gordon Growth Model. > **Explanation:** FCFE is discounted at the cost of equity because it represents the cash available only to shareholders.
Wednesday, June 25, 2025 Friday, March 21, 2025

Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.