Browse CFA Level 2

Practice Vignette: Single-Stage Dividend Scenarios

A practical deep dive into using the Gordon Growth Model with stable dividend assumptions, complete with step-by-step examples, insights, and a guided vignette for real-world application.

Vignette Context and Overview

So, you’ve probably heard how the Dividend Discount Model (DDM) focuses on the present value of expected future dividends. Well, in this section, we’ll step into a classic single-stage DDM scenario. In the exam, you’ll often see it introduced with a short narrative—maybe referencing a stable firm with a consistent payout. The item-set format can include a bit of “storyline” or background, so it’s helpful to know exactly how to isolate the critical numbers.

In our example, we’ll check out a hypothetical utility company, “Alpha Utilities,” which is projected to grow its dividend at a stable 4% rate annually. Let’s run with that. This scenario will help you sharpen your skill at reading vignettes, picking out the key data, and applying the formula quickly (but carefully).

Single-Stage DDM: Key Inputs

The single-stage DDM—often called the Gordon Growth Model—relies on these core inputs:

• D₀: The current (most recent) dividend per share.
• g: The expected annual growth rate of dividends (assumed constant, at least in the single-stage model).
• r: The required rate of return or cost of equity for the firm.

And in words, the model says: “Today’s value of the equity is essentially the next dividend divided by the difference between investor’s required return and the growth rate.” Symbolically:

$$ V_0 = \frac{D_1}{r - g} $$

But remember, D₁ is next period’s dividend: D₁ = D₀ × (1 + g).

Practical Example: Alpha Utilities

Let’s walk through the sample scenario. This might look super familiar from your prior reading, but it’s always nice to see it in a “test-like” format.

• D₀ = USD 2.00 (last year’s dividend)
• g = 4% (steady growth assumption)
• r = 9% (cost of equity based on CAPM or some risk-based approach)

Step 1: Calculate Next Year’s Dividend (D₁)

We start by projecting the next year’s dividend:

$$ D_1 = D_0 \times (1 + g) = 2.00 \times (1 + 0.04) = 2.00 \times 1.04 = 2.08. $$

Step 2: Apply the Gordon Growth Model

Now, you plug that D₁ into the single-stage formula:

$$ V_0 = \frac{D_1}{r - g} = \frac{2.08}{0.09 - 0.04} = \frac{2.08}{0.05} = 41.60. $$

Hence, the estimated intrinsic value is USD 41.60.

Step 3: Compare with Market Price

Imagine Alpha Utilities is trading at USD 39.00. If your calculation shows a fair value of USD 41.60, it suggests that the stock may be undervalued by USD 2.60. On an exam, you might see the question: “Is the stock overvalued, undervalued, or fairly valued based on the single-stage DDM?” You can quickly answer, “It appears to be undervalued,” given the difference.

Step 4: Recognize Assumptions

But, well, no model is perfect. And you might want to ask: “Is 4% dividend growth realistic? Is 9% the right cost of equity?” If the utility industry’s demand is stable, maybe so. Or maybe rates are on the rise, driving up r. Even small changes in g or r can lead to significantly different valuations.

Exam Tip: Qualitative Clues

In a vignette, the text might hint that the firm’s sector faces increased regulation, or costs are rising, or the economy is shifting. Such clues may suggest a slowdown in growth or more uncertainty in discount rates. Pay attention to these narrative bits. A typical item set might test your ability to interpret that new rate environment by doing a quick “What if r = 10%?” recalculation.

Simple Sensitivity Analysis

A good practice is to see how interest rates or the growth assumption can shock your intrinsic value. For instance, if r were to jump to 10%, the math changes quickly:

• With r = 10%, and D₁ = 2.08,
$$ V_0 = \frac{2.08}{0.10 - 0.04} = \frac{2.08}{0.06} = 34.67. $$

That’s quite a drop from USD 41.60. The stock might actually look slightly overpriced if it still trades around USD 39.00.

Mermaid Diagram: Single-Stage DDM Sequence

Below is a quick visual flowchart of how you’d typically proceed in analyzing a single-stage dividend scenario. It also captures the “mental steps” you might go through when reading a vignette.

    flowchart LR
	    A["Step 1: Gather Inputs <br/> (D₀, g, r)"] --> B["Step 2: Calculate D₁ <br/> = D₀ × (1 + g)"]
	    B --> C["Step 3: Compute Intrinsic Value <br/> V₀ = D₁ / (r − g)"]
	    C --> D["Step 4: Compare Intrinsic Value <br/> to Market Price"]
	    D --> E["Step 5: Evaluate Assumptions <br/> (Could r or g change?)"]

Quick Python Snippet

If you enjoy double-checking your math—or you’re super into coding—try the snippet below:

1D0 = 2.00
2g = 0.04
3r = 0.09
4
5D1 = D0 * (1 + g)
6V0 = D1 / (r - g)
7
8print(f"Next Dividend (D1): ${D1:.2f}")
9print(f"Intrinsic Value: ${V0:.2f}")

This should output: • Next Dividend (D1): $2.08
• Intrinsic Value: $41.60

So that’s basically what we found by hand.

Common Pitfalls and Best Practices

• Overly Precise Growth: If the exam text suggests that growth “might decline due to new competition,” maybe that stable 4% is now 3% or 2%. Check for disclaimers or footnotes.
• Ignoring Macroeconomic Twists: Interest rate changes—like moves in the risk-free rate or shifts in market sentiment—could raise or lower the cost of equity.
• Failing to Keep Dividend Timelines Straight: Make sure you’re always discounting the correct dividend figure (D₁ is next year’s dividend, not last year’s).
• Confusing Intrinsic Value with Market Price: Intrinsic value is theoretical. The question might also ask you how to reconcile real-life discrepancies between your DDM-based value and the actual trading price.

References and Further Reading

• CFA Institute End-of-Chapter Questions, which usually include item sets similar to Alpha Utilities.
• Corporate Finance by Berk & DeMarzo (for deeper theoretical coverage of dividend growth assumptions).
• Periodicals like The Wall Street Journal or Financial Times to see how analysts discuss dividend expectations.

Single-Stage Dividend Scenarios: Practice Questions

### 1. In a single-stage dividend discount model, which of the following inputs is NOT typically used directly in the formula for calculating a stock’s intrinsic value? - [ ] The required rate of return (r) - [ ] The next dividend payment (D₁) - [ ] The perpetual growth rate of dividends (g) - [x] The market beta of the stock > **Explanation:** While market beta can help estimate the cost of equity (r) through CAPM, it’s not a direct input in the final Gordon Growth Model formula. The formula uses r, g, and D₁ directly. ### 2. Suppose D₀ (the current dividend) is USD 3.00, the growth rate (g) is 5%, and the cost of equity (r) is 8%. What is the next dividend (D₁)? - [x] USD 3.15 - [ ] USD 3.00 - [ ] USD 2.85 - [ ] USD 3.30 > **Explanation:** D₁ = D₀ × (1 + g) = 3.00 × 1.05 = 3.15. ### 3. Continuing from the prior question, what is the stock’s estimated intrinsic value under the Gordon Growth Model? - [ ] USD 39.15 - [ ] USD 45.00 - [x] USD 105.00 - [ ] USD 52.50 > **Explanation:** V₀ = D₁ / (r − g) = 3.15 / (0.08 − 0.05) = 3.15 / 0.03 = 105.00. ### 4. In the Alpha Utilities vignette, if you discover that recent economic changes push the utility’s required rate of return from 9% to 10%, holding everything else constant, how would the intrinsic value be affected? - [x] It would decrease (because the denominator of the model increases) - [ ] It would increase - [ ] It would stay the same - [ ] It cannot be determined > **Explanation:** The denominator (r − g) increases from 0.05 to 0.06, causing a lower computed intrinsic value. ### 5. Which of the following best describes a limitation of the single-stage DDM? - [ ] It accounts for changing growth rates over a company’s lifecycle - [ ] It explicitly captures major acquisitions or divestitures - [ ] It includes increased competition or cyclical downturns in the cost of equity - [x] It assumes a constant growth rate forever, which might be unrealistic > **Explanation:** The single-stage DDM’s main assumption is constant growth into perpetuity, and that can be unrealistic in dynamic markets. ### 6. If a firm’s dividend grows at a constant rate of 4% and the cost of equity is 9%, which part of the formula would be 0.05? - [ ] The dividend payout ratio - [x] The difference between r and g - [ ] The firm’s total return on equity - [ ] The ratio between D₀ and D₁ > **Explanation:** r − g = 0.09 − 0.04 = 0.05. ### 7. True or False: In the single-stage DDM, D₀ is used directly in the formula to compute today’s intrinsic value. - [ ] True - [x] False > **Explanation:** The model uses D₁ (the next dividend). While you start with D₀, you must multiply by (1 + g) to get D₁ for the formula. ### 8. How can a higher inflation expectation affect the Gordon Growth Model valuation, all else equal? - [ ] It will not affect the valuation - [ ] It will cause dividends to remain unchanged - [ ] It decreases the growth rate directly - [x] It could raise the required rate of return, which lowers the valuation > **Explanation:** Higher inflation often drives higher interest rates. That pushes up r, which widens the denominator (r − g) and lowers the value. ### 9. If the market price of a stock is USD 50 but the single-stage DDM estimates the value at USD 45, how might you interpret this difference? - [ ] The firm is definitely undervalued - [ ] The firm is definitely in financial trouble - [x] The firm might be overvalued, or the model’s assumptions may be off - [ ] The model automatically implies a buy recommendation > **Explanation:** A difference between the model’s estimate and market price can indicate potential mispricing or fundamental differences in assumptions. It's not always a clear sign to buy or sell without further analysis. ### 10. True or False: A major assumption in the single-stage DDM is that the dividend payout ratio remains stable over time. - [x] True - [ ] False > **Explanation:** In addition to a constant growth rate, the single-stage model typically assumes a stable payout ratio that supports that growth pattern indefinitely.
Wednesday, June 25, 2025 Friday, March 21, 2025

Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.