In-depth exploration of rights issues, how they're structured, why companies use them, and their impact on ownership dilution, share price, and long-term valuation.
Rights issues are basically invitations from a company to its existing shareholders to buy additional shares before they’re offered to the broader public—often at a price below the current market. Think of it as being in an exclusive club where you get privileged “first dibs” on the new stock offering. The main goal is to raise fresh capital. Companies might need the funds to expand into emerging markets, refinance debt, or invest in new product lines.
I remember hearing a friend say, “Wait, so I get to buy more shares on the cheap? Sign me up!” But there’s a catch: if these rights aren’t exercised, the existing shareholder’s ownership percentage can be diluted when the new shares hit the market.
It’s natural to wonder, “Why not just tap the bond market or take out a loan?” In short, an equity raise via a rights issue can strengthen the company’s balance sheet (less debt is always a plus when it comes to interest payments), provide financing for new projects, or help fund acquisitions. From a CFO’s perspective, raising equity might be essential when the debt levels are already high or when the cost of debt is unattractive.
Let’s remember: the market’s reaction to the rationale behind a rights issue is key. If the announced use of funds is for something forward-looking and strategic (like an R&D push), investors may applaud the move. But if it looks more like a last-ditch attempt to cover operational losses, the share price can take a quick tumble.
Companies typically offer new shares at a subscription price that’s below the prevailing market. That sweet discount incentivizes shareholders to exercise their rights. For example, if the stock trades at $20, the rights issue price might be $16. Current shareholders can snap up the new shares at $16, a seeming bargain.
• Underwriting: Many rights issues are “fully underwritten,” meaning an investment bank (or syndicate) commits to buy any unsubscribed shares. This ensures the company raises the full targeted amount. However, that guarantee comes at a cost: underwriters charge a fee and may end up with a large chunk of shares if a good portion of shareholders choose not to take part.
• Terms: The rights might say that for every 5 shares you currently own, you can purchase 1 new share at the discounted price. If you skip out, well, your ownership slice will shrink relative to those who do buy the new shares.
In a rights issue, the biggest fear for existing shareholders is dilution. Dilution occurs when the total number of shares outstanding increases, thereby reducing the percentage ownership of each existing share.
One straightforward way to assess the impact is by calculating the Theoretical Ex-Rights Price (TERP). This is an estimate of the share price immediately after the new shares start trading. In KaTeX format, TERP can be written as:
Where:
• \(P_{\text{old}}\) is the current (pre-rights) share price.
• \(N_{\text{old}}\) is the number of existing shares outstanding.
• \(P_{\text{subscription}}\) is the discounted subscription price of the new shares.
• \(N_{\text{new}}\) is the number of new shares issued under the rights offering.
If you don’t exercise your rights, your ownership stake can shrink, and the total value of your holdings might drop unless you sell the rights themselves in the market (assuming they are tradable).
Markets can be finicky. Investors might panic if they interpret a rights issue as a distress signal: “Uh-oh, they must be in trouble if they’re asking current shareholders for cash.” That fear may drive the stock price down. On the other hand, if a company with strong fundamentals announces a rights issue for a well-received strategic expansion, the share price might hold up relatively well—or even rise—because shareholders trust management’s plan.
Behaviorally, some investors are quick to sell new rights because they don’t want to commit more capital, whereas others pounce on the discount. Big institutional players might even short the underlying shares, hoping to create hedged positions if they plan to fully subscribe to the rights.
Raising fresh equity capital boosts the company’s cash balance and total shareholders’ equity. This, in turn, can reduce the leverage ratio (e.g., debt-to-equity). It’s common to see:
• A higher cash line on the balance sheet (from the newly raised funds).
• A corresponding increase in the number of shares outstanding.
• Potential changes in per-share metrics like earnings per share (EPS).
EPS is especially sensitive because, although net income might eventually increase if the new funds are productively invested, the immediate issuance of new shares can dilute EPS. And as we know from many academic studies, changes in EPS can have big psychological and valuation impacts on how the market prices the stock.
Imagine a publicly traded company, “BrightTech,” with 100 million shares outstanding, each trading at $10. So, its market capitalization is $1 billion. BrightTech announces it wants to raise $200 million to finance a new product line.
• Terms: For every 5 existing shares, shareholders can buy 1 new share at $8 each.
• That means 20 million new shares will be issued (because 100 million / 5 = 20 million).
• If the rights are fully subscribed, the company will get $8 * 20 million = $160 million, which is short of the $200 million. Let’s assume the remainder is underwritten or the discount is adjusted accordingly in a real scenario.
Check out a (simplified) pro forma balance sheet snippet:
Before Rights Issue | After Rights Issue | |
---|---|---|
Cash | $50 million | $210 million (50+160) |
Shareholders’ Equity | $300 million | $460 million (300+160) |
Number of Shares | 100 million | 120 million |
Book Value/Share | $3.00 | $3.83 (460/120) |
Notice how the additional cash improves the balance sheet, though each share is now a smaller fraction of total ownership. If management invests the $160 million in R&D that yields significant future cash flows, the net benefit to shareholders could be positive despite the short-term dilution.
Institutional investors often engage in sophisticated trading strategies around rights issues:
• Hedge Funds might buy rights and short the underlying shares, aiming to lock in a risk-free gain if the discounted subscription price plus the short proceeds exceed the cost of the hedge.
• Others might speculate on the volatility of the share price during the rights offering period.
These strategies can sometimes cause short-term price distortions, leading to sudden shifts in the stock price. It’s wise for individual investors to stay alert and to read the fine print on the rights terms to see if they’re better off subscribing, selling the rights, or ignoring them altogether (the last option typically being the worst if the rights are in the money).
Below is a basic diagram illustrating the structure of a rights issue and the potential paths a shareholder might take:
flowchart LR A["Company announces <br/> new shares for existing shareholders"] --> B["Shareholders have <br/> two choices: <br/> 1) Subscribe <br/> 2) Sell rights"] B --> C["Capital infusion <br/> into the company <br/> if rights are exercised"] B --> D["Ownership dilution <br/> if rights not exercised"]
• Pitfall: Ignoring the rights offering. Some shareholders wrongly assume it’s optional noise. In reality, ignoring your rights can result in valuable entitlements going to waste.
• Pitfall: Failing to consider the subscription price’s discount. If the discount is large, it might be worth buying the new shares even if you plan to partially hedge or sell them later.
• Best Practice: Perform a TERP calculation for a quick sense of the post-rights share price.
• Best Practice: Examine the use of proceeds. If the company is raising capital to expand into a profitable market, the short-term dilution might be overshadowed by the long-term payoff.
Rights issues can be a double-edged sword. They offer exciting financing avenues for companies but can leave shareholders struggling with complex decisions about whether to pony up more cash or risk dilution. From the CFA Level II perspective, focus on:
• How to compute the post-issue share price (TERP).
• The effect on key valuation metrics, including EPS and book value per share.
• Market sentiment factors that cause a stock to lose or gain value upon announcement.
• The role of underwriters and potential arbitrage opportunities.
On exam day, watch out for item sets that combine a rights issue scenario with a company’s strategic plan. They might ask you to evaluate how the share price or EPS changes, or how the capital structure shifts. If they mention “fully underwritten,” think about potential fees and the risk that unsold shares could be bought by the underwriter. And don’t forget to practice with pro forma statements, because that skill frequently shows up in equity vignette questions. Good luck!
• Rights Issue: An offering of additional shares to existing shareholders, often at a discount
• Theoretical Ex-Rights Price (TERP): The estimated share price after the rights issue
• Underwriting: A guarantee by an investment bank to buy any unsubscribed shares
• Dilution: Reduction in ownership percentage as total shares outstanding increase
• Pro Forma Financials: Adjusted statements reflecting anticipated changes or transactions
• Ownership Percentage: A shareholder’s proportion of total equity
• Penman, S. (2013). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation.
• CFA Institute. (2025). CFA® Program Curriculum for Level II, Equity Investments.
• Various journal articles in the Journal of Corporate Finance on market reaction to rights issues.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.