Learn how to adjust private company balance sheets from book value to fair value, including tangible and intangible asset revaluations, off-balance-sheet items, and sensitivity analyses under IFRS 13 and U.S. GAAP.
Have you ever glanced at a private company’s balance sheet and thought, “Hmm, that’s definitely not what this firm would fetch if sold tomorrow?” Well, you’re not alone. Book values on financial statements are typically recorded at historical cost or adjusted only to some extent—often leading to sizable gaps between reported carrying amounts and actual market values. This gap is where “book value adjustments” step in.
In this section, we’ll walk through how to revalue a private company’s assets and liabilities to their fair values. We’ll talk about tangible assets (property, machinery) and intangible assets (trademarks, patents, and more), plus we’ll chat about off-balance-sheet items, contingent liabilities, and good ol’ IFRS 13. My own first client assignment in this space was a small manufacturing firm where the historical cost of their press machines was totally off from the real secondary market price. It was an eye-opener for me, and I realized how critical precisely adjusting book values is—especially for high-stakes valuations like M&A or strategic expansions.
In private company valuation, the asset-based approach often takes the company’s balance sheet as a starting point. We determine net asset value by summing assets (both tangible and intangible) at fair value, then subtracting liabilities (also at fair value). The resulting figure can differ dramatically from the balance sheet’s “book value” because conventional accounting seldom fully captures current market conditions.
Some reasons for these mismatches:
• Historical Cost: Many assets are on the books at the purchase price, which could be decades old.
• Depreciation & Amortization: Accounting life cycles may have little to do with actual market value (especially for intangible assets that might skyrocket in value).
• Accounting Standards: Under IFRS or U.S. GAAP, fair value adjustments can be limited or only recognized under specific circumstances.
• Market Conditions: Real estate, technology, or intangible values might have soared—or crashed—since the asset was originally recorded.
All this means that if you want a real sense of a company’s net worth, you need to translate book values into values a buyer and seller might agree upon in an arm’s-length transaction.
Tangible assets, such as real estate, machinery, equipment, and vehicles, often require an adjustment from their carrying amounts to fair value.
Identifying Assets for Revaluation
Start by listing all significant capital assets. Check their book values in the balance sheet. Cross-check with physical inspections, appraisal reports, or secondary market data for used machinery (common in manufacturing).
Revaluation of Assets
For real estate, you might seek an independent property appraiser’s opinion. Sometimes, we rely on comparable sales data from the local market. If you notice a widely active secondary market for your assets (e.g., used trucks, basic industrial machinery), you might get a relatively fair “Level 2” type input (observable prices). However, specialized, custom machinery often lacks a vibrant secondary market. That can push you into “Level 3” territory, requiring assumptions, DCF (discounted cash flow) models, or specialized valuations from experts.
Adjusting Liabilities
Liabilities also get revalued to fair value. Long-term debt may trade at a premium or discount if current interest rates differ from the time of issuance. For instance, if the note is at a fixed rate that’s significantly above market, the debt’s fair value might be lower than its face value.
Intangible assets—patents, trademarks, copyrights, customer lists, and goodwill—can represent a massive portion of a private company’s true worth. In certain sectors (like pharmaceuticals and technology), intangible assets might exceed tangible ones.
• Appraisals and Comparable Transactions
Intangible asset value often depends on future earnings potential. For example, a patent’s value may be estimated by looking at potential licensing revenues or by referencing sales comparisons to similar patents in the same industry. Often, intangible appraisals use DCF methods incorporating discount rates appropriate for the asset’s risk profile.
• Specialized Appraisers
If you’re dealing with highly technical assets (e.g., novel drug patents), you’ll often rely on specialized appraisers who are experts in that field.
• IFRS 13 and Level 3 Inputs
Most intangible asset valuations fall under Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy because the data points are unobservable. You’ll rely heavily on management forecasts, industry benchmarks, and your own assumptions.
One of the trickiest parts of an asset-based valuation is discovering hidden or “off-balance-sheet” items. Sometimes, a significant chunk of the business is in special purpose vehicles or is structured as an operating lease. And then there are contingent liabilities such as product warranties or pending lawsuits.
• Operating Leases: IFRS 16 requires many leases to be capitalized, but older statements might not have incorporated them. It’s up to the analyst to ensure that the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized at fair value.
• Special Purpose Entities: Some business units might be off the main balance sheet. You’ll often need to consolidate or at least note the net effect on total assets and liabilities if the entity is effectively controlled.
• Contingent Liabilities: If the company faces lawsuits or environmental clean-up obligations, those potential claims could reduce the firm’s net value. Disclose them and estimate a fair value for the exposure if possible.
Under IFRS 13 (Fair Value Measurement), fair value is “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.” Meanwhile, U.S. GAAP has a similar stance, with ASC 820 providing parallel guidance. Both set out a hierarchy:
• Level 1: Inputs from quoted prices in active markets (e.g., stocks).
• Level 2: Inputs from similar (but not identical) assets in active markets, or identical assets in less active markets.
• Level 3: Unobservable inputs—prices or valuations based heavily on estimates, internal models, and assumptions.
Private company valuations rely heavily on Level 3 inputs because there’s typically no readily available market price. Consequently, assumptions about discount rates, growth, or salvage value are crucial—and ethically, you must use objective, unbiased data wherever possible.
Market assumptions can shift quickly. You might raise your reference discount rate from 12% to 14% if market interest rates spike, drastically lowering the fair value of intangible assets. So it’s important to illustrate the range of possible outcomes:
• What if the real estate market corrects by 10%? • What if the licensing deal on a patent doesn’t materialize? • What if the discount rate for intangible valuation changes by 1 or 2 percentage points?
Sensitivity analysis helps you see the magnitude of these possible shifts. In a formal valuation report, it’s common to include best-case, worst-case, and base-case scenarios.
We all know: messing around with these valuations can be a big no-no. Overstating or understating asset values can lead to investor confusion, misallocation of capital, or even legal trouble. It’s crucial to maintain professional skepticism, gather credible appraisals, and disclose assumptions. The CFA Institute Code and Standards emphasize independence and objectivity—particularly relevant when your hypothetical client or your boss wants a certain “favorable” number.
Below is a simple Mermaid diagram illustrating how you progress from book value to an adjusted net asset value for a private company:
flowchart LR A["Book Value from Balance Sheet"] --> B["Identify Assets & Liabilities for Revaluation"] B --> C["Adjust Tangible Assets to Fair Value"] B --> D["Adjust Intangible Assets to Fair Value"] C --> E["Revised Net Asset Value"] D --> E E --> F["Incorporate Off-Balance-Sheet Items & Contingent Liabilities"] F --> G["Final Adjusted Net Asset Value"]
Let’s say you have a small technology start-up with the following partial balance sheet:
• Equipment: Book Value $500,000
• Software Development Costs (Intangible): Book Value $200,000
• Patent: Not recorded (internally generated, so $0 on the books)
• Contingent Liability for a lawsuit: Potential cost of $100,000
• Long-Term Debt: Book Value $300,000
Your investigation reveals:
• Equipment’s fair value is $750,000, based on an independent appraisal.
• The intangible software is valued at $400,000 by referencing comparable IP transactions in the same sector.
• The unrecorded patent is appraised at $250,000 using a discounted cash flow approach.
• The lawsuit probably will settle at around $80,000.
• The company’s long-term debt trades externally at $290,000.
Reconciled fair-value balance sheet might look like this:
Item | Book Value | Fair Value Adjustment | Fair Value |
---|---|---|---|
Equipment | 500,000 | +250,000 | 750,000 |
Software Development Costs | 200,000 | +200,000 | 400,000 |
Patent | 0 | +250,000 | 250,000 |
Long-Term Debt (Liability) | -300,000 | +10,000 | -290,000 |
Contingent Liability (New) | 0 | -80,000 | -80,000 |
Net Assets | 400,000 | +630,000 | 1,030,000 |
So, the original net assets were $400,000. After revaluing, we end up with $1,030,000—an increase of $630,000 once intangible assets, liabilities, and contingencies are properly accounted for. Notice how intangible assets and the difference in equipment’s fair value contributed significantly to the final figure.
If you’re up for some hands-on practice:
Comparing your final figure with the original book value is often an eye-opening experience.
• Ignoring intangible assets simply because they’re not capitalized on the balance sheet.
• Accepting “internal valuations” at face value without external or third-party confirmation.
• Overlooking contingent liabilities that might degrade net worth significantly.
• Failing to do a thorough check for new IFRS or GAAP pronouncements that alter fair value measurement guidelines.
• CFA Institute Level II Curriculum, Equity Investments (Private Company Valuation)
• International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 13: Fair Value Measurement
• Damodaran, A. (2021). Damodaran on Valuation. Wiley
• Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2020). Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. 7th ed. Wiley
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.