Dive into an engaging vignette illustrating the step-by-step process of residual income modeling, from equity charges to long-term growth assumptions, culminating in a hands-on valuation approach.
Residual income (RI) valuation models provide a framework for understanding how a firm’s intrinsic value can be viewed as the sum of its book value and the present value of all future residual incomes. They can be powerful tools to see if a company’s current market price stacks up against its fundamental value buzz. But I’ll admit it: the first time I saw the formula, I remember thinking, “Isn’t this just another variation of discounting future cash flows?” Well, it is and it isn’t. The unique angle here is that you start with an accounting measure—book value—and then layer in “residual” earnings based on the cost of equity.
What follows is a scenario-based practice vignette for a basic residual income calculation. We’ll walk through the conceptual underpinnings, drop in a few personal insights (I’ve definitely made mistakes in these calculations once or twice), and show you how small changes in growth or discount rates can reshape your entire analysis. Let’s get started.
Residual income can be broadly expressed using the following formula:
Where:
• \(\text{RI}_t\) is the residual income in year \(t\).
• \(\text{Net Income}t\) is the firm’s expected net income in year \(t\).
• \(r_e\) is the firm’s cost of equity (often computed using CAPM or a build-up approach).
• \(\text{Book Value}{t-1}\) is the beginning-of-period book value of equity.
If the net income a firm generates exceeds the charge (i.e., equity charge) that shareholders demand, that excess is “residual income.” The company is producing returns above its cost of capital, and that’s good news for valuation.
Let’s use the following Mermaid diagram to visualize the process:
flowchart LR A["Calculate Next <br/> Year's Net Income"] B["Compute Equity Charge <br/> (Cost of Equity × Book Value)"] C["Residual Income <br/> = Net Income - Equity Charge"] D["Discount RIs to Present <br/> & Add them to <br/> Current Book Value"] A --> B B --> C C --> D
Imagine—well, it might not be too hard to imagine—a mid-cap tech company called NeoFlex. They’ve been pivoting into AI-based solutions, their net income is fairly stable, but they’re aiming for moderate growth. We have the following information:
• Current Book Value of Equity (\(BV_0\)): $500 million
• Current Net Income (\(NI_0\)): $80 million
• Expected Growth of Net Income (Year 1): 8%
• Stable Long-Term Growth After Year 1: 5%
• Cost of Equity (\(r_e\)): 12%
• Dividend Payout: 20% of net income each year
When a company pays dividends, the book value for the next period is adjusted by net income minus dividends. Because the payout ratio is 20%, the rest (80%) is retained and presumably plowed back into the firm to generate future growth. Over time, we track how these items play out.
First, we want next year’s net income. Next year is projected to grow by 8%:
The equity charge for year 1 is:
So, the residual income for year 1:
Just like that, you can see NeoFlex’s next year’s net income is well above the equity cost, meaning the firm is generating positive residual income.
After year 1, the company’s net income grows at 5% indefinitely (according to the scenario). Because a portion of net income (80%) is retained, the book value will keep inching upward, leading to incremental changes in the equity charge. For a simple approach, though, we might assume that the book value grows proportionally with net income (especially over a long horizon), or we calculate each year’s opening book value more precisely:
We’d continue that logic to get \(BV_2\), \(BV_3\), etc. Meanwhile, net income for year 2 would be:
But let’s not get lost in the weeds. The essential question remains: do these incremental net incomes keep generating positive residual income over time, and if so, how do we discount them back to the present?
The typical residual income valuation formula can be summarized as:
So we take each year’s residual income, discount it at 12%, and add the present value to today’s book value of $500 million. When the growth rate is lower than the cost of equity (5% < 12%), the present values converge.
If you wanted all the details in a more mechanical sense, it might look like this in Python:
1r_e = 0.12
2BV = 500.0
3net_income = 80.0
4growth1 = 0.08
5growth_long_term = 0.05
6payout_ratio = 0.20
7
8ri_values = []
9present_values = []
10num_years = 5 # Suppose we do a 5-year forecast + terminal assumption
11
12for t in range(1, num_years + 1):
13 if t == 1:
14 net_income *= (1 + growth1)
15 else:
16 net_income *= (1 + growth_long_term)
17 equity_charge = BV * r_e
18 ri = net_income - equity_charge
19 # discount residual income t years back
20 pv_ri = ri / ((1 + r_e) ** t)
21 ri_values.append(ri)
22 present_values.append(pv_ri)
23
24 # update Book Value for next period
25 dividends = net_income * payout_ratio
26 BV += (net_income - dividends)
27
28valuation = 500 + sum(present_values)
29print(f"Estimated Value: ${valuation:,.2f}")
In practice, we often use a continuing, perpetual formula for the tail end beyond our forecast horizon. If the stable long-term growth is \(g\) and cost of equity is \(r_e\), the continuing RI can be capitalized as:
…and you discount that terminal value back as well.
In a perfect world, net income and dividends are the only changes to book value—i.e., the “clean surplus.” But let’s say you discover intangible write-offs that bypass net income or some foreign currency translation losses that are recognized only in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI). You’d then need to adjust your net income to reflect the “dirty surplus” elements. If the problem specifically states anything about intangible or off-balance-sheet items, you either incorporate them into net income or adjust your book value at the appropriate times. But if no details are given, you can safely assume the clean surplus relation holds.
Let’s say your sum-of-the-present-value-of-RI plus current BV ends up at $750 million. If NeoFlex’s market capitalization is only $680 million, there’s a decent chance the stock is undervalued. Or maybe it’s overvalued if the number you get is below the market cap. That’s the essential question you need to answer: does the “fair” or intrinsic value of the firm exceed or lag behind the actual market?
We can’t stress enough: small changes in your discount rate or growth assumptions can create big shifts.
– If \(r_e\) changes from 12% to, say, 11.5%, the difference might sound minuscule, yet the present values can balloon.
– If your net income growth is just 6% instead of 5%, that’s a 20% relative increase in the growth rate for that stable phase, and that can push your valuation up.
That’s why you want to run scenario and sensitivity analyses. I remember messing up a decimal in the growth input—turning 5% into 50%—and the resulting valuation was so large that it was obviously out to lunch. Always double-check your decimals, exponents, and your cost of capital entries.
• Normalize Metrics: Ensure net income is truly representative of ongoing operations. One-time gains or losses can skew your base.
• Confirm Growth Assumptions: Be realistic. For a mature industry, a perpetual growth rate above 6% might be tough to justify.
• Cross-Check Book Values: Watch how dividends are subtracted out of book value. Over time, the book value is often your anchor in the RI approach.
• Compare Against Other Measures: DDM or FCFE valuations can complement RI. It can really open your eyes if the valuations converge or diverge.
• Adjust for “Dirty Surplus” Items: If you see large foreign currency translation adjustments, pension cost remeasurements, or intangible write-offs that bypass net income, factor them in.
Below is a simplified sample of how you might table out the calculations for the first two years:
Item | Year 0 | Year 1 | Year 2 |
---|---|---|---|
Beginning Book Value ($ millions) | 500.0 | 500.0 | 569.12* |
Net Income ($ millions) | 80.0** | 86.4 (80 × 1.08) | 90.72 (86.4 × 1.05) |
Dividends ($ millions) (20% payout) | – | 17.28 | 18.14 |
Equity Charge ($ millions) | – | 60.0 (0.12 × 500) | 68.29 (0.12 × 569.12) |
Residual Income ($ millions) | – | 26.4 (86.4 – 60.0) | 22.43 (90.72 – 68.29) |
Ending Book Value ($ millions) | 500.0 | 569.12 (500.0 + 86.4 –17.28) | 641.70 (569.12 + 90.72 – 18.14) |
Notice how the equity charge changes each year as book value changes. Residual income can either climb or slip, depending on the growth in net income relative to the growth in the equity charge.
flowchart TB A["Year 0 <br/> Book Value = $500m"] B["Year 1 <br/> Net Income = $86.4m"] C["Equity Charge = $60m"] D["RI_1 = $26.4m"] E["Year 1 <br/> BV = $569.12m"] F["Year 2 <br/> Net Income = $90.72m"] G["Equity Charge = 0.12 x $569.12m = $68.29m"] H["RI_2 = $22.43m"] A --> B B --> C C --> D D --> E E --> F F --> G G --> H
To wrap it all together, you’d discount each RI at 12%, sum them up, and then add $500 million (the original book value). That final figure is your “intrinsic” estimate. Compare it to the actual market value or price. If your final number is higher, it might signal that the market is placing too low a value on the company’s ability to generate returns above its cost of equity. If it’s lower, the market might be overly optimistic about the firm’s prospects.
• Time Management: On the exam, you’ll see a small table of data— be sure to label your cost of equity, net income, and book value carefully.
• Vignette Cues: The prompt might subtly point to a dirty surplus item. Don’t ignore intangible write-offs or translations!
• Easy Points: The question asking for next year’s RI is usually straightforward. Don’t overcomplicate it—stick to the formula.
• Sensitivity: If they ask a “what if” question—like “what if cost of equity changes to 10%?”— be prepared to redo the discount factor quickly in your head (or on your approved calculator).
• Show Your Steps: In a real practice environment, or in your personal note-taking, detail your steps. This helps catch silly arithmetic slip-ups.
• Pinto, Jerald E., Elaine Henry, Thomas R. Robinson, and John D. Stowe. “Equity Asset Valuation, 4th Edition.”
• Henry, Elaine, and Thomas R. Robinson. “Analysis of Equity Investments: Valuation.”
• Penman, Stephen H. “Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation.”
They offer deeper insights, more advanced examples, and nuanced discussions about dirty surplus issues, intangible assets, and other real-world complexities.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.