Explore the essential mechanics for valuing interest rate swaps, including fixed and floating leg methodologies, calculating swap rates, and understanding day count conventions.
Interest rate swaps are at the heart of the global derivatives market, used by corporations, financial institutions, and investors to manage interest rate risk, fine-tune cash flows, or speculate on interest rate moves. At their core, interest rate swaps allow two parties to exchange payment obligations, typically exchanging a fixed interest payment for a floating one (or vice versa) on the same notional principal.
Maybe you’ve heard stories about how large companies lock in a fixed rate on their debt to achieve more predictable financing costs. Well, an interest rate swap is exactly the kind of tool that helps make that possible. In this section, we’re diving deep into how these swaps are valued once they’re in play and why the concept of a “swap rate” is so crucial.
An interest rate swap usually consists of:
Even though it’s called a “swap,” neither side exchanges the notional principal (in standard vanilla interest rate swaps). What actually moves between the parties are the periodic interest payments.
In a typical plain-vanilla interest rate swap:
• The fixed rate is determined at the start to make the fair value of the swap zero at inception.
• The floating rate resets periodically, which often makes its value “par” (or very close to it) right after each reset date.
Below is a simplified diagram of a generic fixed-for-floating interest rate swap:
flowchart LR A["Fixed Rate Payer"] -- Pays Fixed Rate --> B["Swap Counterparty"] A -- Receives Floating Rate <-- B A -- Notional Remains Unexchanged -- B
When we say “swap rate,” we mean the fixed interest rate that sets the initial value of the swap to zero. Think of it like the magic number that ensures neither side has a cost advantage at the start. If you’re paying this fixed swap rate, you’re essentially agreeing to a fair deal that balances out the expected floating payments over time.
What’s cool is that the swap rate isn’t plucked out of thin air. It’s usually inferred from the market—particularly from observed yield curves on government bonds, reference rates on floating instruments, and the current supply-demand dynamics for interest-rate exposure.
For example, if the 3-month floating rate is projected to hover around 2.5%–3.0% over the next few years, the fixed swap rate will reflect that anticipation. It might be set around the average expected floating rate, adjusted for any credit or liquidity premiums embedded in the swap market.
To set the stage, let’s consider how we value an interest rate swap on Day One. Because neither party wants to pay an upfront premium, the present value (PV) of the fixed leg must equal the PV of the floating leg. When these two match perfectly, the swap’s initial value is zero for both sides—meaning it’s a fair transaction.
Imagine you’re paying a fixed rate \( r_\text{fixed} \) on a notional \( N \). The fixed leg typically makes periodic payments based on:
where \( \tau \) is the fraction of the year based on the swap’s day count convention (e.g., 30/360, Actual/365, or Actual/360). If the payments occur at times \( t_1, t_2, …, t_n \), the present value of the fixed leg can be approximated as:
Here, \( DF(t_i) \) is the discount factor for time \( t_i \). Notice we also add the notional \( N \) discounted back at \( t_n \) if there is any principal exchange at maturity (or if it’s structured like a bond). In most vanilla interest rate swaps, the notional is not exchanged, but in some theoretical valuations, we can interpret the last discounted notional to reflect the final flow if the swap structure includes a final principal exchange.
For the floating leg, the payments are typically:
If the floating rate “resets” at the start of each payment period to match current market rates, the floating leg’s value right after a reset date often reverts to par (or the notional \( N \)) because you’re essentially receiving (or paying) the market rate. Thanks to this par floater feature, the floating leg is commonly valued at (or near) the notional at reset.
Thus, at initiation (right after a rate reset), the present value of the floating leg is often assumed to be equal to \( N \) (if there’s no spread). If there’s a spread, or if the next floating payment is mid-accrual, the valuation approach becomes more nuanced. But in a vanilla swap, the concept of “par floater” usually keeps things straightforward at the reset date.
To make the swap worth zero at inception:
Solving for the fixed rate that satisfies this equality gives us the “swap rate.” This rate changes constantly in the market as interest rate expectations and yield curves evolve.
Once time passes and market interest rates do their roller-coaster thing, the fixed leg’s value can deviate from the floating leg’s value. If the fixed rate you are paying is higher than the new market swap rates, your swap becomes more valuable to your counterparty (and less valuable to you) because they’re receiving a higher-than-market fixed rate. Conversely, if your fixed rate is lower than the new market swap rates, you’re in a favorable position.
Practically, to figure out the swap’s value at some time \( t \) after initiation:
If we label the value of the fixed leg as \( V_\text{fixed}(t) \) and the floating leg as \( V_\text{floating}(t) \), then:
Depending on which side of the swap you hold, this value could be an asset (positive) or a liability (negative).
The floating leg isn’t always precisely notional value after the reset date. There are small factors such as:
But for exam-focused valuations and standard theoretical discussions, par floater assumptions remain a good approximation for the floating side right at or near reset dates.
Swap rates are deeply intertwined with the market’s expectations of future short-term rates, plus any risk premiums. They often trade closely with government yield curves, but the “swap curve” can differ. In reality, the swap curve is a key tool for:
In practice, you’ll hear about “swap spreads,” which is basically the difference between the swap rate for a specific maturity and the yield of a government bond of the same maturity. Swap spreads can widen or narrow due to credit risk, liquidity concerns, or shifting demand for interest-rate hedging.
You’ll see all sorts of variations in interest rate swaps. Some pay semiannually on the fixed leg and quarterly on the floating leg; others pay monthly floating amounts. The day count convention can differ between legs (e.g., 30/360 for fixed payments and Actual/360 for floating). Such details impact:
Here’s a small table summarizing common conventions:
Convention | Typical Usage |
---|---|
30/360 | Often used for corporate bonds |
Actual/360 | Common in money markets |
Actual/365(FIX) | Some UK markets and derivatives |
Quarterly | Often floating leg (LIBOR, SOFR) |
Semiannual | Common for fixed leg in the U.S. |
Make sure to confirm these details in the final swap documentation (like the ISDA Master Agreement). They might sound trivial, but they can subtly impact the final cash flow calculations.
Let’s walk through a mini numeric example to bring these concepts to life. (Heads up: This is simplified to keep the math from getting too overwhelming.)
Suppose you enter into a $10 million notional interest rate swap:
At initiation, if the market expects the average 1-year LIBOR to be around 3.00% over the swap’s 3-year life, your fixed rate is fair, and the swap value is zero. But picture a few months later, if the yield curve shifts and now the market expects the average 1-year LIBOR to be 4.00% for the next three years, your fixed rate of 3.00% is obviously below what the market’s implying. The floating leg is more valuable now (since it’ll pay more in the future), and your position (as the fixed-rate payer) has lost value.
To figure out by how much you’ve lost, you:
That difference shows how in- or out-of-the-money your swap is.
I once saw a smaller firm that had a plain-vanilla swap (pay 5.50% fixed, receive LIBOR). They set it up years earlier when overnight rates were high. As rates fell, the firm realized their fixed payment was quite steep compared to new market rates. The CFO was initially shocked at how “underwater” the swap was. They eventually negotiated a swap termination with the bank—at a price. This story underscores how vital it is to keep tabs on your swap’s mark-to-market value as rates fluctuate.
Final Exam Tips:
• You’ll likely see scenario-based questions comparing swap valuation at initiation vs. midlife. Practice discounting both fixed and floating leg cash flows separately.
• Be comfortable with the par floater concept. It’s a foundational shortcut for valuing floating legs.
• Keep an eye on day count, payment conventions, and any spreads—these details can change the final result.
• For constructed-response questions, show each computational step clearly and explain the logic.
Concise Reference List
• McDonald, Robert L. “Derivatives Markets.” 3rd ed., Pearson.
• Fabozzi, Frank J. “Fixed Income Analysis.” CFA Institute Investment Series.
• ISDA 2006 Definitions: https://www.isda.org/book/isda-2006-definitions
Stay thorough in your practice, and remember that beyond the formulas, understanding the economic intuition and mechanics behind swaps is the key to conquering swap-pricing questions on the exam. Good luck!
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.