Explore the mechanics, risk–reward profiles, and practical uses of covered calls and protective puts. Learn how these popular option strategies can enhance income, hedge downside risk, and shape portfolio outcomes.
Covered calls and protective puts are two cornerstone strategies in options trading—often serving as the first foray into options-based risk management and yield enhancement for many investors. They combine long positions in the underlying asset with either selling (writing) or buying options, thereby tailoring a portfolio’s risk–return profile in a straightforward, mechanical way.
Truth be told, the first time I tried a covered call a while back, I was both excited and a bit nervous. I wanted to earn that extra income (the option premium) but also worried about having my stock called away if it soared. Similarly, when I started buying protective puts, I felt relieved to have a safety net for any substantial drop. Sound a bit familiar? If so, you’re not alone—these strategies are widely used exactly because they can help manage risk and produce additional cash flow, all in relatively easy-to-understand frameworks.
They do come with trade-offs, of course, and in this section we’ll explore the mechanics, payoff diagrams, potential applications, and best practices. We’ll analyze how to manage your covered call or protective put positions, highlight typical pitfalls, and give some final tips for exam scenarios. The goal is not only to show you how they work but to help you develop an intuition about when and why they might be useful—both for your exam prep and for real-world portfolio management.
A covered call is established when an investor owns the underlying asset (long position in a stock—or possibly an exchange-traded fund or index) and simultaneously writes (sells) a call option on that same asset. The call option is said to be “covered” because, should the call buyer exercise the option, the seller already holds the underlying shares and can deliver them without having to purchase them in the market at (potentially) a higher price.
From a Level I exam perspective, it’s crucial to remember that the covered call’s payoff is simply the sum of two separate payoffs:
In a perfect no-arbitrage world (see Chapter 7 on Arbitrage, Replication, and Cost of Carry for more fundamental references), the covered call is akin to placing a cap on your upside in exchange for immediate premium income. Conceptually, you’re trading some potential future gains for current cash flow.
Why write a covered call? Typically, investors expect the underlying asset might trade sideways or perhaps move slightly higher but not skyrocket. You collect premium income (which you keep if the option expires worthless), and that premium can slightly offset small losses if the asset price declines. At the same time, if the stock rally is robust and pushes well above the call’s strike price, your gains are capped (beyond the strike plus premium).
Below is a simplified total payoff diagram for a covered call at expiration. “S(T)” will denote the underlying’s price at option expiration, and “K” the strike price of the written call.
Key payoff components:
• Long Stock: Gains or losses are linear as S(T) changes.
• Short Call: The short call payoff is –max(S(T) – K, 0).
Hence, the total payoff is:
Covered Call Payoff = S(T) – [Short Call Loss if S(T) > K] + Premium Received
We can illustrate the payoff at expiration with a simple Mermaid diagram:
graph LR A["Payoff"] --- B["Stock Price at Expiration <br/> (S(T))"] A --> C["Value of Covered Call"] style A fill:#F2F2F2,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px style B fill:#F2F2F2,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px style C fill:#F2F2F2,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
In a more detailed payoff diagram, you would typically see the lines reflecting a slight shift upward by the premium amount, but you would also see a plateau in gains past the strike price K (plus the premium).
Let’s put some actual figures on it. Suppose you own 100 shares of XYZ Corp. at $50 per share. You write (sell) one call option on XYZ with a strike price of $55, receiving a $2 per share premium:
• Initial stock purchase price (cost basis): $50.
• Premium received for call: $2.
• Strike price: $55.
At expiration:
• If S(T) < $55: The call expires worthless. You keep your shares (which are now worth S(T)) and the $2 premium.
• If S(T) > $55: The call will likely be exercised. You deliver the shares at $55, and keep the $2 premium collected when you wrote the call. Your maximum profit is capped at ($55 – $50) + $2 = $7 per share.
And yeah, if the stock soars to $70 in a surprising bull run, you still must deliver the shares at $55, forgoing any upside beyond that. Hence the strategy’s trade-off: You lock in immediate premium income but potentially sacrifice big bullish gains.
Just because it’s called “covered” doesn’t mean you’re immune to losses. If the stock tumbles, the premium from the short call only provides a small offset to what could be a large negative stock return. For instance, if S(T) plummets to $30, you incur a $20 loss on the shares (from $50 down to $30) but keep the $2 premium, so your net loss is $18 on the position. In other words, you’re still exposed to significant downside risk—though you have a $2 cushion against that initial fall.
Thus, from a risk management standpoint, covered calls are generally considered mildly bullish or neutral strategies. You’re not particularly worried about missing out on a big upside move, and you want some small buffer in the form of premium income.
• Time Decay (Theta): As expiration approaches, the call option’s time value decays. This decay can benefit you if the stock remains below the strike, helping your written option expire worthless.
• Implied Volatility: Higher implied volatility means bigger option premiums, which can be attractive. But it also suggests the market anticipates greater price swings—meaning the underlying itself is more volatile.
• Strike Selection: Choosing a higher strike capping your gains at a more distant price but receiving a smaller premium. Conversely, picking a lower strike yields a larger premium but increases the likelihood of early assignment and less upside.
• Tax and Transaction Costs: If you’re forced to deliver shares at the strike, you could trigger capital gains (or create other tax considerations). Transaction costs also reduce your net premium.
A protective put essentially insures your long stock position. You purchase a put option, giving you the right (but not the obligation) to sell the underlying shares at the put’s strike price. In exchange for paying the put premium, you gain downside protection below that strike. In a sense, it’s like paying an insurance premium to protect your car—you hope you never need it, but you’re glad it’s there if disaster strikes.
The protective put payoff is the sum of:
This arrangement sets a floor under your potential losses. You still keep all the upside if the underlying rallies, but you lose the cost of the put premium if the market rises (or stays flat) and the put expires worthless.
If you let S(T) be the price of the underlying at expiration and K be the put strike price, the protective put payoff at expiration can be described as:
Protective Put Payoff = S(T) + max(K – S(T), 0) – Put Premium Paid
• If S(T) < K: The put is in the money. This allows you to sell your shares at K (rather than the market price S(T)), effectively limiting losses.
• If S(T) > K: The put expires worthless, and you keep your stock. You do, however, forfeit the put premium.
Below is a simple Mermaid flow to illustrate the protective put structure:
graph LR A["Payoff"] --- B["Stock Price at Expiration <br/> (S(T))"] A --> C["Value of Protective Put"] style A fill:#F2F2F2,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px style B fill:#F2F2F2,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px style C fill:#F2F2F2,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
In a traditional payoff diagram, the protective put strategy line will merge with the stock line on the upside, but it will flatten at the strike price K on the downside, minus the put premium, limiting how far the investment can fall in value.
Imagine you hold 100 shares of ABC Inc. at $40 per share. You decide to buy a put at a strike of $38 for $1 per share:
• Stock purchase: $40.
• Put cost: $1.
• Put strike: $38.
Outcomes at expiration:
• If S(T) collapses to $25, your put is in the money. You can exercise the put and sell the shares at $38, thereby limiting your loss to ($40 – $38) + $1 = $3 per share.
• If S(T) rises to $50 and the put expires worthless, your final outcome is $50 – $40 = $10 profit on the shares, but you also spent $1 on the put. So your net profit is $9.
One small note: if the underlying rallies substantially, you might regret paying that $1 put premium that never got used—akin to paying for auto insurance you (hopefully) never need. But the downside protection purchased can be an enormous relief if the stock plummets.
Within your portfolio, a protective put is a bullish strategy with downside insurance. If your outlook is bullish but you’re worried about abrupt crashes or negative surprises, a protective put can mitigate those tail risks. The cost, of course, is the put premium, which reduces your net upside.
• Premium Levels: High implied volatility on the put might make purchasing expensive.
• Strike Selection: A higher strike might offer greater protection (i.e., less drawdown) but costs more.
• Optimal Timing: Timing put purchases to coincide with times of relatively low implied volatility can improve cost effectiveness.
• Rolling Strategies: Investors sometimes roll their protective puts, buying longer-dated puts or changing strike levels as the underlying price moves.
Both strategies overlay an option position on an existing stock holding, but each serves a different primary purpose:
• Covered Call
– Best for: Mild or neutral bullish outlook.
– Income Generation: Yes—collect premium upfront.
– Downside Protection: Limited. The premium provides a small buffer.
– Upside Potential: Capped at the strike price if assigned.
• Protective Put
– Best for: Bullish outlook but with hedging needs.
– Income Generation: None. Instead, you pay a premium.
– Downside Protection: Substantial—losses are limited below the put strike.
– Upside Potential: Preserved aside from the cost of the put.
In practice, many portfolio managers choose between these two based on risk tolerance, market outlook, cost constraints, and portfolio objectives. If you’re looking for some immediate yield boost and have a neutral or mildly bullish expectation, a covered call can be compelling. By contrast, if you’re worried about a big drawdown but still want unlimited upside, a protective put is probably better aligned with your needs—though you’ll pay for that peace of mind.
Income Enhancement
• Covered calls can “monetize” a well-chosen equity portfolio that an investor is already satisfied holding. Even if the equity doesn’t move much, the premium can contribute significantly to returns.
Downside Hedge
• Protective puts are used by institutional money managers to secure a floor on portfolio losses, especially during times of market uncertainty.
Collar Strategy
• At times, investors combine covered calls with protective puts into a “collar”: you own the underlying, write a call, and buy a put. The call premium can help offset (fully or partially) the put cost, creating a more cost-efficient hedge.
Tactical Adjustments
• Shorter-term horizon: If you believe volatility will spike, you might want protective puts in place.
• Longer-term horizon: Consistent covered call writing can systematically reduce the effective purchase price of the underlying over time.
• Assignment Risk for Covered Calls: If the stock rallies sharply or the call goes deeply in the money, you might be assigned early (especially for calls on dividend-paying stocks). Check ex-dividend dates.
• Overpaying for Puts: If implied volatility is high and you don’t calibrate your strike price, you can bleed away returns if the put’s premium is too large relative to your risk tolerance.
• Liquidity Considerations: Thinly traded options can have wide bid-ask spreads, raising transaction costs and making efficient rolling more difficult.
• Psychological Traps: After seeing short calls “work out” a few times in a sideways market, people sometimes forget that if the stock suddenly surges, they’ll miss out on significant gains. Similarly, if you repeatedly buy puts that expire worthless, you might question the cost, only to potentially skip protection right before the market plunges.
• The covered call’s maximum gain is capped at the strike price plus the premium received.
• The protective put limits your downside to (purchase price of underlying – put strike) plus the premium paid.
• Know how to calculate break-even points:
– For the covered call: (Underlying Price – Premium) on the downside. On the upside, the break-even is effectively underlying price at initiation minus the premium (but profits are capped at strike + net premium).
– For the protective put: Your break-even is your underlying’s purchase price plus the put premium.
• Be sure you’re comfortable with how time decay (Theta), changes in implied volatility (Vega), and delta exposures can affect each strategy’s performance during the life of the option.
• Understand the difference between being assigned (covered call) vs. exercising your put (protective put).
• In portfolio contexts (exam item sets might show an equity manager seeking partial downside protection or modest yield enhancement), be ready to interpret how these strategies fit the manager’s objectives.
• Reilly, Frank K., and Keith C. Brown. Investment Analysis & Portfolio Management. Thomson South-Western.
• CBOE’s strategy papers on protective puts and covered calls:
https://www.cboe.com/strategies
For a deeper discussion of portfolio-level hedging and advanced overlays, refer to Chapter 6 (Derivative Benefits, Risks, and Uses) on risk management considerations, and Chapter 4.9 (Greek-Based Hedging Strategies) to see how option greeks can be used to fine-tune the risk profile of covered calls and protective puts.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.