Explore lease rate arbitrage mechanics, focusing on precious metals, cost of carry, and opportunities driven by mispriced forward contracts and lease rates.
It’s always kind of fun when you come across what seems like a “free lunch” in the financial markets—though, as we’ve all heard, there’s no such thing as a truly free lunch. Lease rate arbitrage is one of those strategies that can feel close to it when market conditions align just right. The idea is pretty simple: if the lease rate on a precious metal (like gold, silver, or platinum) diverges from what theory tells us it should be, then a trader might earn a near risk-free spread.
This phenomenon often pops up in the context of gold. Many of the world’s central banks hold vast stores of gold and, from time to time, they lend that gold to bullion banks. When they do, they charge a lease rate on the metal. If that lease rate—plus the other costs or benefits of holding gold—is out of sync with forward prices, then an arbitrage opportunity emerges.
But before we dive in deeper, we should set out the foundation. We’ll talk about how it works, who participates, and how lease rates reflect broader market forces. We’ll also walk through some potential pitfalls, because, let’s be honest, “cheap and easy” in finance can sometimes be illusions.
Lease rate arbitrage, at its core, mirrors the logic of other cost-of-carry models, but with a twist: rather than dealing only with storage costs, dividends, or convenience yields, we tack on a lease rate. Here, the lease rate is effectively the cost of renting a physical asset (like gold) for a certain period.
In a typical cost-of-carry model for a storable commodity, the forward price (F) for settlement in T years, starting from a current spot price (S), might be expressed as:
where:
• r = risk-free interest rate
• u = storage costs
• y = convenience yield
But consider that gold can be borrowed from some large central bank or bullion bank at an annualized lease rate L. In that case, the carrying cost changes because you effectively shift the ownership timeline of the physical gold. If the forward price in the market doesn’t reflect this lease rate, there’s a crack in the no-arbitrage relationship.
Let’s imagine you’re a trader at a major financial institution, and you spot an opportunity. You see that the forward price for gold is out of line with what you calculate it should be after factoring in both the risk-free rate and the lease rate. Here’s the kind of process you might carry out:
If the difference between that forward price and the implied no-arbitrage forward (which includes the lease rate) is large enough, your profit is essentially locked in. Under perfect conditions—no frictions, perfect liquidity, unlimited borrowing—this is basically a riskless trade. Of course, in real life, there are transaction costs, haircuts on collateral, potential reputational or credit risk, and more.
It often helps to see how the money and gold flow. Below is a Mermaid diagram that summarizes the transaction at a high level:
flowchart LR A["Trader borrows gold <br/>from bullion bank (pays lease rate)"] --> B["Trader sells gold in spot <br/>market at price S"] B --> C["Proceeds invested at<br/>risk-free rate (r)"] C --> D["Trader enters forward to<br/>repurchase gold at price F"] D --> E["At lease maturity:<br/>Trader uses proceeds + interest<br/>to buy gold in forward market"] E --> F["Return gold to lender"]
From this diagram, we see a cycle: gold is borrowed, sold, proceeds invested, gold is purchased forward, and returned. The key is that the cost of borrowing (the lease rate) plus the forward buyback price must be less than the final wealth generated from investing the proceeds. If that condition holds, the trader profits.
Although retail investors might attempt versions of this via derivatives, lease rate arbitrage in its truest form is usually dominated by big institutions. Here are the main players:
• Central Banks and Bullion Banks: They hold large inventories of gold, motivated by portfolio needs and sometimes macroeconomic strategies. Their willingness to lease metal sets the supply side of the lease market.
• Hedge Funds and Proprietary Trading Desks: They hunt for price discrepancies and have the capital and infrastructure to execute complex trades across different markets quickly.
• Commodity Merchants and Refiners: They may naturally hold inventory for operational needs and can become lessors themselves if they believe it’s profitable to lend out their metal.
Central banks typically hold gold as part of their foreign exchange reserves. If they believe a portion can be leased without compromising monetary objectives, they can earn extra yield. Should many central banks decide to offer more gold for lease, supply in the lease market goes up, which pushes lease rates down.
When central banks reduce their supply of lendable gold, or if there’s a sudden surge in demand for physical gold (maybe because of geopolitical turmoil), then lease rates can spike. That’s often when the forward prices deviate from “fair value,” creating new arbitrage possibilities.
Let’s walk through a stylized numerical illustration—just something to give you the flavor:
• Spot Gold Price (S): $1,900 per ounce
• Lease Rate (annual): L = 1.2%
• Risk-Free Rate (annual): r = 2.5%
• Time to Maturity: 1 year
When the lease matures, you use your $1,947,500 to buy 1,000 ounces for $1,938,000. Suppose you owe a small gold lease fee in ounces, or a cash equivalent. Let’s assume the total cost in gold ounces is 1,000 plus 12 ounces for the 1.2% lease rate, or the cost in cash is $1,938,000 plus some small interest in gold terms. If the math works out so that your final proceeds exceed all these costs, that difference is your profit. Because you locked everything in from day one, you had minimal exposure to gold price fluctuations.
In real trades, you must account for margin, collateral requirements, bid-ask spreads, and potential storage or transport costs (though those might be low for gold, especially if it just sits in a vault). Still, the concept stands: the difference between the forward price and the implied forward price given by spot plus financing minus lease cost can yield a (virtually) risk-free payoff.
It’s crucial to emphasize that although lease rate arbitrage often sounds like an easy win, there are real risks and annoyances:
• Counterparty Risk: If you’re leasing gold from a central bank, that risk might be low. But if you’re dealing with smaller counterparties, they might default, or their gold might be encumbered.
• Liquidity Constraints: During times of financial stress, not all markets remain liquid at the same time. You might find it harder to exit a position or roll it over.
• Changes to Lease Rate or Policy: Central banks may alter their gold leasing programs rapidly. If your trade is open, it could face unexpected costs or forced unwinds.
• Transaction Costs: Spreads, brokerage, and operational overhead can eat into what initially appears to be a generous arbitrage margin.
One of my acquaintances once joked that sometimes you can see an apparent arbitrage in gold forwards, but by the time you factor in all the fees—clearing, shipping, interest, haircuts on collateral, not to mention the overhead of dealing desks—the trade might become dime-on-the-dollar territory. So, be cautious.
Lease rate arbitrage is a classic illustration of how forward markets, financing rates, and physical commodity costs interact. It’s a great example to keep in your back pocket for exam questions involving no-arbitrage principles, cost-of-carry, and the behavior of precious metals.
In exam scenarios, especially if you see a question with relationships between spot prices, forward prices, risk-free rates, and lease rates, you might be asked to:
• Calculate the theoretical forward price given the lease rate.
• Identify if an arbitrage opportunity exists and outline the steps to exploit it.
• Discuss factors that could eliminate or reduce the profit from the trade.
Best practice is to remember that the forward price must incorporate not just storage costs but also the lease rate. If the forward price is somehow “too high” or “too low” relative to spot after factoring in the cost of borrowing or leasing the metal, that’s your sign to start scribbling out an arbitrage strategy.
For the exam, manage your time carefully if such a question shows up. Lay out the formula first, define each variable, and systematically walk through the calculations, double-checking that you track all relevant fees (lease rate, interest, transaction costs). That thorough approach usually nets the most points, especially in an essay-style question or a multi-part item set.
• Kabance, Paul. “Precious Metal Leasing and Swaps,” Commodity Research Bureau.
• Fabozzi, Frank, et al. “Handbook of Commodity Investing.” Wiley.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.