Explore the key differences between physically delivered and cash-settled futures and forwards, including practical examples, operational considerations, and exam-focused insights for CFA Level I candidates.
Sometimes, when we talk about derivatives like futures and forwards, we tend to focus on the contract terms, margins, and payoffs—without thinking too hard about what happens when the contract actually expires. But here’s the catch: not all contracts get settled in the same way. Some require you to deliver or receive the underlying asset, while others simply require a cash payment reflecting any gains or losses. This difference—between physical and cash settlement—can seriously affect everything from your operational setup to your risk management strategy.
In this section, we’ll discuss the essentials of physical settlement and cash settlement for forward and futures contracts. I remember back when I was a fresh-faced junior analyst: I read about how some unsuspecting trader ended up receiving a literal shipment of commodities because they failed to close out a physically delivered contract before expiry. It was a bit of a fiasco—and definitely a story that made me realize how “settlement details” are critically important!
When a forward or futures contract matures, you have to settle the position. Settlement can be executed either physically (transferring the underlying asset) or financially through a cash payment. Let’s break it down in simple terms before diving into more advanced details:
• Physical Settlement: The party in the short position delivers the actual commodity or instrument. The party in the long position pays the agreed-upon price and takes possession.
• Cash Settlement: No one delivers any physical asset. Instead, one party pays the other an amount equal to the difference between the contract price and the final settlement price, which is typically determined by a benchmark or exchange-set price on the last trading day.
So, why do we even have two types of settlement? In a perfect world, you’d just pick whichever is easiest. But in reality, the choice depends on:
• The nature of the underlying asset (is it practical to store or deliver?).
• The market’s preference (some markets, like corn or crude oil, prefer actual delivery for commercial reasons).
• Regulatory standards (some jurisdictions or exchanges might require certain types of settlement).
• Operational feasibility (for instance, financial index futures are impossible to deliver physically).
From a portfolio manager’s perspective, the decision to hold a physically delivered or cash-settled contract can also affect your hedging approach—especially if you legitimately need the commodity for your business operations.
Physical settlement entails transferring the actual commodity or financial instrument at expiration (or during the delivery window). For example, if you hold a long cattle futures contract until maturity, you could literally end up with live cattle in a holding pen somewhere. Similarly, if you’re trading a bond futures contract with physical delivery, you would need to deliver or receive a pool of deliverable bonds that meet certain exchange criteria.
Physically delivered contracts are more common when the underlying assets are tangible (e.g., agricultural products, metals, or energy commodities) or are easily standardized financial instruments (e.g., government bonds).
• Hedgers in Commodity Markets: Farmers may use futures to lock in a selling price for their produce or cattle. They often favor physical delivery because they can deliver the goods they already produce.
• Commercial Consumers (e.g., food processors, power plants): These entities might opt for a physically settled contract so they can take delivery of necessary raw materials.
If you’re in charge of a real-world commodity operation, you want the option to deliver or receive the underlying product in a streamlined manner, helping you lock in costs or revenues.
Let’s say you’re a wheat farmer. You sell a wheat futures contract at $5 per bushel to lock in a price for your harvest. When the contract expires, if you choose not to close out your futures position, you’ll be responsible for physically delivering the wheat to fulfill your obligation. The short position (you, the farmer) delivers the wheat; the long position pays the agreed price, and the contract is settled.
Physical settlement often comes with specific rules that require the short position to notify the exchange or clearinghouse of their intention to deliver. This “notice period” typically starts a few days before the contract’s final expiration. Missing that window can force you into an unexpected cash settlement—or additional fees or complications.
With physical settlement, you have logistical challenges:
• Storage Facilities: If you’re the buyer (long), do you have somewhere to store those barrels of oil or bushels of wheat?
• Transportation Arrangements: Delivery can involve trucking, shipping, or pipeline logistics.
• Quality and Grade Standards: Exchange rules typically specify the grade or quality of the commodity that must be delivered (e.g., for wheat, the protein content or moisture level).
In short, if you’re dabbling in physically delivered futures, you need to plan for more than just the financial side of the trade. Otherwise, you might be caught by surprise.
With cash settlement, there is no need to move any physical good or financial security at expiration. Instead, the difference between the contract price and the official settlement price is exchanged in cash. This official settlement price is usually determined by the exchange’s methodology—often based on the closing price of the underlying or a specially calculated index.
For instance, if you have a futures contract with a price of $2,050 on an equity index and that index settles at $2,100 on the final day, the short position would pay the difference ($2,100 – $2,050) times the multiplier to the long position.
Cash settlement is especially popular in:
• Stock Index Futures (e.g., S&P 500 futures). Let’s be honest: you can’t deliver “500 stocks” in neat physical bundles.
• Interest Rate Futures (e.g., Eurodollar, certain LIBOR-based or risk-free rate-based futures). The underlying is an interest rate, not a commodity you can ship in a truck.
• Currency Futures (some are physically delivered, but many prefer net settlement). Currency is deliverable, but often it’s simpler to net out the difference in cash.
The biggest perk of cash settlement is convenience. Traders don’t have to worry about:
• Warehousing a commodity.
• Managing the logistics of shipping.
• Potential disruptions from supply chain or inventory issues.
For purely financial assets (like indices or interest rates), cash settlement is a must. And from a risk management perspective, it’s simply more efficient if you have no commercial use for the underlying commodity or bond.
Imagine an asset manager who wants to hedge a broad equity portfolio but doesn’t want to sell each individual stock. They can short S&P 500 futures. If the S&P 500 index goes down, they gain on the futures contract, offsetting losses in the underlying portfolio. At expiry, the gain or loss is settled in cash based on the final index value. No transferring “500 separate stocks,” no complicated partial deliveries.
The following table offers a quick snapshot of the major differences:
Aspect | Physical Settlement | Cash Settlement |
---|---|---|
Delivery of Asset | Underlying commodity or security is delivered | No actual asset moves; differences settled in cash |
Common Underlyings | Commodities (wheat, oil, metals) Some bonds |
Stock indices Interest rates Many currency futures |
Key Participants | Producers, commercial hedgers | Financial hedgers, speculators, portfolio managers |
Logistical Requirements | Storage, shipping, quality checks, notice period | None (just need to reconcile final settlement prices) |
Operational Complexity | High | Low |
Settlement Risk | Physical inspection, quantity, and quality risk | Primarily price risk (less operational risk) |
Whether settlement is physical or cash-settled, the clearinghouse stands at the center, ensuring both buyer and seller fulfill their obligations. For physically delivered contracts, the clearinghouse typically supervises delivery logistics. For cash-settled contracts, it calculates how much cash must be exchanged.
Margin requirements are standard tools to mitigate counterparty risk, especially in futures. While the daily mark-to-market process is the same for both physical and cash-settled contracts, the final settlement day can trigger additional margin calls if prices move sharply. The difference is in what you must deliver: margin calls for a physically settled contract ensure the short can actually acquire or produce the commodity (or security), while margin calls in a cash-settled world just ensure there’s enough cash on hand.
Here is a simple flowchart illustrating how a futures contract can either settle physically or in cash:
flowchart LR A["Open a<br/> Futures Position"] B["Approach<br/> Expiry"] C["Physical<br/> Delivery"] D["Cash<br/> Settlement"] E["Fulfill Delivery <br/>(Buyer pays,<br/> Seller delivers)"] F["Pay/Receive <br/>Cash Difference"] A --> B B --> C B --> D C --> E D --> F
For a portfolio manager balancing multiple asset classes, these settlement differences can be critical. Sometimes you’d prefer to avoid the physical side altogether—like if you’re simply adjusting your exposure to an index. Other times, physical settlement can be a strategic advantage. An energy company needing oil for operations might want to receive actual barrels via physically settled futures. By aligning settlement type with your end goal, you avoid inefficiencies and possible headaches.
• In many jurisdictions, regulators (e.g., the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in the US) set rules governing who can deliver the underlying and how.
• Exchanges often have detailed rulebooks for the quality of physically delivered commodities.
• Cash settlement is frequently used for index and rate futures to simplify market participation and reduce operational risk.
Under IFRS and US GAAP, futures and forwards are recognized at fair value on the balance sheet, with gains/losses typically flowing into profit or loss. For physical settlement, you might reclassify the underlying commodity or financial instrument in your accounting records once delivery takes place. In many cases, if the contract is used as a hedge, you should comply with hedge accounting standards (e.g., IFRS 9 or ASC 815). If you’re dealing with physically settled contracts for your operational needs, the cost of the goods might be recognized as inventory upon receipt.
• Carefully distinguish between physical and cash settlement in any derivative scenario. Formulas and payoff diagrams don’t always highlight settlement mechanics, so be sure you know the conditions for each.
• On the exam, you may be asked how physical vs. cash settlement impacts risk management. Articulate how operational risk, liquidity considerations, and storage costs factor into decision-making.
• Remember that physically settled commodities may require planning around delivery procedures.
• If you see a question about interest rate or index futures and the exam scenario mentions “no actual transfer of assets,” it’s a strong indicator of cash settlement.
• Time management: Don’t spend too long on settlement details unless the question specifically demands it; answer precisely what the prompt requests.
• Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Guidelines:
https://www.cftc.gov
• Reuters Commodity Essentials (News coverage on deliveries and their influence on prices).
• IFRS 9, “Financial Instruments.”
• CFA Institute, 2025 Curriculum—Level I, Volume 7: Derivatives.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.