Learn how basis risk in futures hedging arises, why it matters, and how to manage it effectively by selecting highly correlated instruments and closely monitoring changing spot-futures price dynamics.
When we talk about hedging with futures, we usually assume that the futures contract price and the hedger’s underlying asset price move in perfect tandem. Of course, the real world is never that tidy. Basis risk, in essence, arises from the mismatch—or incomplete correlation—between the futures price and the spot price of what you’re trying to hedge.
In a perfect hedge, your gain in one market (futures) offsets your loss in another (the spot or cash market), leaving you with zero net loss or gain. However, that perfect lock-step alignment is about as common as a real four-leaf clover. If the futures contract and your underlying asset exhibit slight differences—in terms of grade, location, timing, or even different market forces—you’re left with basis risk.
I personally remember the first time I had to hedge a commodity position—soybeans, to be exact. I was new to the concept of basis. One week, the local spot price decoupled unexpectedly from the futures price. I was scratching my head thinking, “Seriously, I thought these were supposed to move together?” Surprise! The basis had widened, prompting me to roll my futures contract and reevaluate the correlation. The net result was not disastrous, but it was definitely an eye-opener that hammered home the notion: no matter how well you plan, basis risk lurks in the details.
In this section, we’ll explore how basis risk arises, how to measure and manage it, and why it’s important for anyone who uses futures to hedge exposures—whether in commodities, fixed income, or even equity indices.
The “basis” is simply the difference between the spot price of the asset you’re hedging and the futures price of the contract you select. We can express it in a straightforward formula:
(1)
B(t) = S(t) – F(t)
Where:
• B(t) = Basis at time t
• S(t) = Spot (cash) price of the asset at time t
• F(t) = Futures price of the chosen contract at time t
If the basis is positive, it means the spot price is higher than the futures price. A negative basis implies the spot is lower than the futures. While these definitions may sound simple, the real trick is understanding how B(t) changes over time. This shift—called “basis movement” or “basis risk”—can be the real troublemaker in a hedge.
It’s perfectly normal for the spot and futures prices to differ, given factors like storage costs, interest rates, convenience yield, or location adjustments. But when these factors change unpredictably, the basis changes, too. Three main causes often stand out:
• Seasonal Effects: Agricultural commodities often exhibit seasonal basis movements based on harvest times, weather shocks, or changes in inventory.
• Quality Differences: Crude oil, for instance, is not just “crude oil”—there’s West Texas Intermediate (WTI), Brent, and a variety of other blends. If you hedge WTI with Brent futures, the correlation might be strong but not perfect. Differences in quality or grade lead to basis risk.
• Market Demand/Supply Discrepancies: Spot and futures markets can each react differently to sudden demand or supply shifts (transportation bottlenecks, shipping constraints, immediate local demand, etc.).
Even if you choose the theoretically “right” contract (e.g., the same underlying commodity grade and the same delivery location), day-to-day or intraday variations can still arise. Over time, if your hedge horizon is several months, these variations can accumulate and turn your intended offset into something that’s less than perfect.
Correlation is key. The closer the correlation between your underlying spot asset and the futures contract, the less basis risk you typically face. Let’s say you’re an airline hedging jet fuel with crude oil futures. That’s a cross-hedge: you’re not directly hedging jet fuel with a jet-fuel futures contract (maybe it’s not liquid enough, or doesn’t exist in your market). Instead, you’re using crude, which is a closely related but not identical product. The correlation might be high, but it’s never 1.0 (i.e., perfect). If the correlation unexpectedly drops, your hedge can slip off track.
In more quantitative terms, you might examine historical correlation data to see how your underlying’s spot price has tracked the futures you plan to use. The higher the correlation, the smaller the expected basis risk. But always remember: historical correlation is only a guide. Real-world markets love to break old patterns when you least expect it.
Below is a short Python snippet that demonstrates how you might check correlation between two price series—one representing your spot, the other your prospective futures contract:
1import pandas as pd
2
3correlation = prices['spot'].corr(prices['futures'])
4print(f"Historical Correlation: {correlation:.4f}")
A correlation close to +1.0 suggests strong positive movement, while anything significantly less might hint at bigger basis risk.
Whether you’re a soybean farmer or an airline CFO, your main question is: how effectively does my hedge offset adverse moves in the spot? If your underlying asset sells off by $10 per unit, and your futures gain is $10, that’s a perfect hedge. But if the future only gains $8 while your spot asset lost $10, that $2 difference centers around basis.
In general, the total risk of your position is:
(2)
Total Risk = Spot Market Risk – Gain from Futures Hedge + (Change in Basis)
When the futures price moves nearly in sync with the spot price, that “Change in Basis” is negligible or downright zero. But if it widens or narrows unpredictably, the difference can be significant. You can measure the hedge’s effectiveness by comparing the variance of your unhedged position to the variance of your hedged position—factoring in basis changes.
So, you might be thinking, “Okay, so what do I do about it?” Although you’ll never fully eliminate basis risk in most real-world hedges, there are steps you can take to reduce it:
• Select the Closest-Matching Futures Contract: The best scenario involves using a futures contract that’s tied to the same underlying, same quality or grade, and ideally the same delivery location and month as your exposure.
• Monitor the Basis Continuously: Keep track of how the basis is evolving. If you see unusual widening or narrowing, it might be time to adjust your hedge or even temporarily close it out.
• Roll the Hedge at Appropriate Intervals: As futures delivery months approach, the contract will expire. Rolling your hedge means closing out the near-month contract and moving into a further-out contract. This “rolling” introduces additional basis risk because the new contract’s pricing environment might deviate from what you had.
• Diversify Your Hedge Tools: Sometimes using only one type of futures contract might be too narrow. You could supplement with options, different maturities, or even over-the-counter swaps, as long as the combined correlation to your underlying remains robust.
Rolling is a natural part of a long-term hedge. Suppose you’re hedging a commodity that you’ll need to protect for the next 12 months, but the most actively traded futures contract expires in four months. As expiration looms, you’ll need to “roll” into a contract further down the curve. Each time you do this, the new contract will have its own price, which might not align with the old contract’s basis. This creates roll yield or roll loss, which can change your total hedging effectiveness.
Imagine you initially sold a December futures contract at $50 to hedge a spot position that was valued at $52 (i.e., the basis was $2, spot – futures). When December is about to expire, you buy back that contract (at $49) and then sell a March contract at $51. The new basis (your spot might be $53 while the new futures is $51) is now $2 again, but the overall effect of the roll might have introduced an extra gain or loss compared to if you just magically extended the original December contract. This entire process demands close attention to how the spot and futures “reset” around each roll date.
If the asset you’re trying to hedge doesn’t have a liquid futures market—or any futures contract at all—you might resort to cross-hedging. In cross-hedging, you choose a futures contract for an asset closely related to your exposure, but not identical. An example is using crude oil futures to hedge jet fuel, or using a euro futures contract to hedge a basket of European currencies. Because the underlying is merely related, not the same, you’re likely to experience a more substantial basis risk. You can measure historical basis movements for guidance, but you must expect that basis can shift substantially in times of market stress.
Some advanced hedgers try to optimize their hedge ratio. Instead of a 1:1 ratio (one futures contract for each unit of underlying exposure), they’ll run a regression or some correlation-based optimization to find the ratio that minimizes the variance of their combined spot-futures exposure. This approach can partially address basis risk by adjusting the hedge ratio to the actual empirical relationship between spot and futures.
Nonetheless, even with an optimized hedge ratio, if the underlying correlation dynamics break down or if a shock hits the market, basis risk can still become a costly surprise.
Let’s walk through a short hypothetical:
• A wheat producer wants to hedge 10,000 bushels of Hard Red Winter Wheat (spot price $5.10 per bushel). No exact futures contract for that specific variety and region is available; the farm decides to use a more liquid Soft Red Winter Wheat futures that trades at $5.00—a basis of $0.10.
• Over the next two months, the local spot price for Hard Red Winter Wheat increases to $5.50, while the Soft Red Winter Wheat futures only rise to $5.30.
• Now the basis has moved to $0.20. If the farmer sold futures at $5.00 originally to hedge, they lost out an additional $0.10 per bushel in local cash terms beyond what the futures offset.
This example underlines how the difference between the local spot price and the futures reference price changed—raising the final, net cost (or lost revenue) for the farmer despite having a hedge. Had the farmer used a Hard Red Winter Wheat futures contract (assuming good liquidity), the basis risk might well have been smaller.
Below is a conceptual diagram of basis changes over time. Imagine a steadily increasing spot price and a futures curve that lags or leads slightly.
graph LR A["Spot Price <br/> Over Time"] --> B["Basis = (Spot - Futures)"] B --> C["Futures Price <br/> Over Time"] B --> D["Widens or Narrows <br/> with Market"]
In this simplistic diagram, the difference (Spot – Futures) is not constant and can shift due to various market conditions.
• Basis: The difference between the spot price of the asset being hedged and the futures price of the contract used.
• Correlation: A statistical measure (ranging from –1.0 to +1.0) indicating how two variables move in relation to each other.
• Cross-Hedge: Using one asset’s futures contracts to hedge exposure in a different but correlated asset.
• Rolling the Hedge: Exiting an expiring futures position and opening a new position in a later-expiration contract to maintain continuous hedging coverage.
• Using Illiquid Contracts: If the futures contract you pick is thinly traded, slippage and illiquidity can exacerbate basis risk.
• Ignoring Storage and Carry Costs: For commodities, storage and carrying charges can affect futures prices differently than your local spot market environment.
• Not Tracking Time Decay of Correlation: Past correlations can shift if supply-demand factors change drastically over time.
• Overconfidence in “Perfect” Hedge: Remember, perfect hedges rarely exist. Maintain a realistic understanding of the limitations of your hedge instrument.
Meanwhile, best practices pivot around thorough research, continuous monitoring, and dynamic hedge adjustments. Some large firms keep “basis risk trackers” or dashboards that plot daily changes to ensure swift action when unexpected basis movements occur.
In many jurisdictions, how you account for your hedges can affect reported earnings. If you qualify for hedge accounting under rules like IFRS 9 or U.S. GAAP (ASC 815), then changes in fair value of the futures might be offset against the exposure in a special accounting framework. But if your basis risk becomes large, the mismatch might still emerge in your financial statements and cause earnings volatility. Also, regulators often require you to post margin for your futures positions, which can tie up capital that might be needed elsewhere.
For the CFA Level III exam, basis risk can appear in constructed-response questions where you must discuss the effectiveness of a proposed hedging strategy and the reasons it may fail to provide perfect protection. You could also see item sets focusing on calculating the final payoff of a hedged position, factoring in changes in the basis. Be sure to:
• Practice relevant calculations (e.g., computing the effective outcome when basis changes).
• Understand rolling mechanics.
• Know when cross-hedging is appropriate and how to articulate the potential basis risk.
• Remember to highlight that perfect correlation is rarely guaranteed.
As with many advanced exam questions, the scenario might require you to evaluate how well a futures contract matches an exposure. Mention the likely basis risk, potential correlation shifts, and how you might fine-tune the hedge ratio or re-balance your positions over time.
• Working, Holbrook. “Theory of the Inverse Carrying Charge in Futures Markets.” Journal of Farm Economics. (Historical discussion of basis in commodity markets.)
• CFA Institute continuing education materials on hedging strategies and basis risk management.
• Hull, John C. Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives.
• Official CFA Institute Curriculum – Derivatives: Pay special attention to sections discussing hedging effectiveness and cross-hedging.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.