Explore the mechanics, risks, and opportunities of calendar spreads, a strategy involving options at the same strike but different maturities, to manage time decay and volatility in a portfolio.
Calendar spreads (sometimes called horizontal spreads) can be an intriguing tool for those aiming to capitalize on time decay and shifts in implied volatility. The position typically involves selling a near-term option and buying a longer-term option on the same underlying security, both at the same strike price. One of my colleagues once shared how he hopped into a calendar spread for the first time, expecting minimal price movement in the underlying, only to see that near-term option hang on to a bit more premium than he’d hoped—giving him a few jitters! That’s the kind of situation we’ll talk through here: how you might profit from time decay and implied volatility changes, but also where the pitfalls hide.
A standard long calendar spread consists of:
• Selling a near-dated option (often with only a few weeks to expiration), typically a call or put, depending on your directional bias.
• Simultaneously buying a similar option—same strike, same underlying—but with a later expiration date.
You’re essentially “legging in” to an options strategy that benefits from the near-term option decaying faster (time decay, or theta) relative to the longer-term option. As near-term expiration approaches, that short option’s theta typically accelerates, meaning its time value can evaporate quickly—this is good for the seller. Meanwhile, your longer-term option should experience a slower rate of time decay, preserving a chunk of time value for you.
One quick side note: it’s possible to structure the spread in the opposite direction (buy near-term, sell long-term), but that’s far less common because it implies you’re paying for short-term premium that decays rapidly. Most folks are seeking that net time-decay advantage by selling the near-term leg.
Calendar spread outcomes hinge on two key factors: time decay and implied volatility.
• Time Decay (Theta): You receive short-term premium from the near-term option you sold. As expiration nears, that short option tends to lose its time value faster than the longer-dated option. Ideally, if the underlying price stays near the strike through the short expiration, you pocket the short premium, and your long option still has decent time value.
• Implied Volatility: If implied volatility rises, the longer-dated option usually benefits more than the near-dated option because there’s a higher vega (volatility sensitivity) in longer-term options. In a perfect scenario, your short near-term option decays to near-zero, and your long option rises in price due to volatility expansion. If volatility plummets, however, you might not get the benefit you expected from the longer leg.
On the flip side, if the underlying makes a big price move in the near term, your short option might blow up in value (for instance, if you sold a near-term call and the underlying surges, that short call can become painfully expensive to buy back). You could end up in trouble if you don’t manage the position carefully.
Many traders find calendar spreads appealing in flat or range-bound markets when they don’t expect big short-term price moves. If you suspect the underlying might remain dormant until the near-dated expiration, it’s perfect. The short leg expires worthless, so you keep that premium, while the long leg still has embedded time value.
Moreover, if you predict a volatility pop sometime in the future—but not necessarily in the immediate term—calendar spreads can be a decent approach. The short-dated option’s payout (or cost to you) might be limited if implied volatility remains subdued short term. Meanwhile, your longer-dated option might surge in value if volatility aligns with your forecast later.
The term structure of volatility can make or break your spread. If the implied volatility for longer-term options is significantly higher than for near-term options, your initial debit for buying the longer option might be large, potentially reducing your overall advantage. Conversely, if the volatility term structure is upward sloping in your favor or if you foresee a greater increase in the longer-dated implied vol, you stand a better chance at a profitable spread.
You might see an inverted term structure after events like earnings announcements, where near-term implied volatility is jacked up (because the near-term has the earnings catalyst), but subsequent months are cheaper. Navigating these volatility term structures is more advanced but can be quite rewarding.
Imagine you have a moderate bullish or neutral outlook on XYZ stock, currently trading at $100/share. You establish a calendar spread as follows:
• Sell one near-term 100-strike call expiring in two weeks for $2.00.
• Buy one longer-term 100-strike call expiring in eight weeks for $5.00.
Your net debit for the spread is $3.00 ($5.00 – $2.00). If, after two weeks, XYZ remains at $100 or slightly above, the short call might expire worthless or near worthless. You keep that $2.00, effectively lowering your cost basis on the long call to around $3.00. Meanwhile, your longer-term call could retain much of its time value or possibly increase if implied volatility creeps up.
If the stock spikes to $110 in that same two-week window, your short call might be worth more than $2.00 (the price you initially collected), and you could face a loss on that leg if you buy it back or if it’s assigned. That’s the essential risk: near-term unpredictability.
Below is a simplified visualization of how the calendar spread position evolves over time:
flowchart LR A["Initiate Calendar Spread<br/>Buy Longer-Term Call for $5<br/>Sell Near-Term Call for $2"] --> B["Near-Term Option Approaches Expiry"] B --> C["If Underlying Stays at or Near $100,<br/>Short Call Decays Substantially<br/>Expires Near Worthless"] C --> D["Keep Premium from Short Call<br/>(Net Debit $3)<br/>Still Hold Long Call with Time Value"] D --> E["Potential Upside if Underlying Rises or Vol Increases<br/>Exiting or Rolling Later"]
This is a very streamlined look. Real-world scenarios can get more complicated once you factor in implied volatility dynamics, early assignment risk (for American-style options), or changes in interest rates and dividends.
In practice, traders often “roll” the short option if they think the underlying might continue to stay within the desired range. Rolling means closing the near-term short leg (as it’s about to expire) and replacing it with another short option at a future date. This can effectively extend the advantage of continued time decay while still retaining that core, longer-dated long option.
• Rolling Up or Down: If the underlying moves away from your strike, you may adjust the strike of your new short leg to capture the best premium. Be aware, though, that changing the strike might alter your overall strategy from a straightforward horizontal spread to a diagonal spread.
• Rolling Out in Time: If you want more time to collect premium, you can sell a new near-dated call (or put). This process can be repeated multiple times, as long as your long option remains beneficial.
That said, each roll adds transaction costs, so weigh those carefully.
You might want to keep an eye on margin requirements. A near-term short option can be assigned if it’s American-style—particularly calls on dividend-paying stocks. If your short option ends up in the money, assignment risk and margin calls could present nasty surprises. Also remember:
• Assignment or Exercise Risk: If assigned early, you must either deliver (for calls) or buy (for puts) the underlying at the strike. This transforms your strategy into a potentially unintended position.
• Volatility Risk: A volatility crash can deflate the value of your long option significantly. Even if your short option is decaying, that might not offset the decrease in your long position’s premium.
• Large Price Moves: A big move soon after you initiate the calendar spread could turn the short leg into a losing position, overshadowing the time value you hope to collect.
• Income Generation in a Range-Bound Stock: If you believe the underlying will remain stagnant over several weeks, calendar spreads help harvest option premium repeatedly.
• Leveraged View of Volatility: Let’s say you anticipate volatility to rise over the next couple of months but not necessarily in the very short term. You might sell that short-term option to reduce cost while you wait for volatility to pick up in the longer-dated leg.
• Adjusting Portfolio Delta: Some portfolio managers use calendar spreads to modulate the portfolio’s overall risk exposures. For instance, a neutral-to-slightly-bullish stance might be expressed through a calendar spread, limiting near-term delta while preserving longer-term upside.
I recall a friend who used a call calendar spread to ride out a potential earnings lull in a tech firm’s share price—he sold the near-term calls just after a big product launch (anticipating a quiet period), then kept that longer-dated call for the next product cycle. He ended up doing fine, although the stock did wander a bit more than he’d anticipated.
• Evaluate Volatility Term Structure First: If the longer-dated IV is extremely high relative to near-term IV, your spread might be too expensive.
• Watch Dividends and Ex-Dates for Calls: Early exercise risk is especially relevant if a dividend is expected.
• Don’t Overlook Early-Assignment Risks: American-style options can be exercised at any time; be prepared.
• Manage Gaps or Large Price Swings: If the underlying leaps or plunges immediately, you may want to exit or roll the short position quickly to mitigate losses.
On the CFA® Level III exam, calendar spreads could show up in item sets or constructed responses focusing on derivatives-based portfolio strategies. One might see a scenario where a portfolio manager uses a calendar spread to manage short-term volatility risk or to reduce cost while maintaining some upside exposure. Important exam angles include:
• Identifying the principal source of profit (time decay vs. volatility shift).
• Explaining how the term structure of volatility impacts the strategy.
• Discussing potential outcomes if the underlying moves significantly or implied volatility changes unexpectedly.
• Illustrating how rolling or adjusting might benefit or harm the strategy.
In any open-ended response, remember to discuss risk management considerations (especially early assignment) and to tie your strategy choice back to the portfolio’s overall objectives.
• Hull, John C. “Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives.” 10th ed., Pearson.
• McMillan, Lawrence G. “Options as a Strategic Investment.” 5th ed., Penguin.
• CFA Institute Level III Curriculum, Derivatives and Risk Management Readings.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.