Learn how to structure and present performance under GIPS requirements, including mandatory disclosures, timelines, and fee presentation considerations.
Have you ever been asked to provide performance results in a way that, well, feels 100% transparent and universally accepted? The Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) were created for precisely that. GIPS are globally recognized standards that define rules and methodologies for how firms should calculate and present their performance—ensuring consistency, comparability, and, most importantly, credibility.
I remember the first time I had to create a GIPS-compliant report for a small equity manager. It felt a bit like reading through a massive checklist. Actually, it was a massive checklist. But once you get the hang of it, you notice how these standardized disclosures benefit everyone—from your clients who want clear data, to your firm’s reputation in demonstrating full transparency. It’s all about trust.
Below, we’ll unpack the main GIPS requirements for performance presentation and reporting. We’ll break things down, talk about the mandatory disclosures, timelines, net vs. gross-of-fees presentations, best practices, and even a quick personal anecdote here or there to keep things real.
When you’re presenting performance under GIPS, there are certain data points and statements that must be included. Think of these as non-negotiable. They help ensure that you’re disclosing enough detail about the strategy and the methods used to calculate performance.
• Composite Description:
You have to specify exactly which investment strategy or portfolio grouping is being measured. For instance, is this composite made up of all large-cap growth portfolios in the firm, with certain risk constraints? A well-defined composite helps readers understand the “universe” of portfolios.
• Firm Definition:
GIPS requires you to clearly outline the boundaries of what constitutes the “firm.” If you have multiple affiliates, subsidiaries, or parent companies, you have to identify the entity that claims compliance. It’s kind of like stating which legal or operational unit is standing behind the performance numbers.
• Benchmark Definition:
Every composite needs a suitable benchmark. And since “benchmark” is sometimes just thrown around as a ticker symbol, GIPS demands you fully describe it—like stating whether it’s a broad market index or if it’s customized. If you’re using something like a blended benchmark, specify the weighting, rebalancing frequency, and rationale.
• Number of Portfolios and Assets:
Within each composite, GIPS wants you to show how many actual portfolios are part of that composite and the total assets in it. This helps readers get a sense of representativeness: does this composite have five portfolios or 500? GIPS also typically requires total firm assets to provide context about the size of the firm relative to the composite.
• Fee Disclosures:
Let’s say your performance calculation is net-of-fees. GIPS wants to know which fees are deducted—whether it’s just the investment management fee or if there are also administrative/operational fees being taken out. If you’re presenting gross-of-fees, you still have to reveal which fees the client would typically bear outside of management fees (like performance fees or certain transaction costs).
• Currency, Valuation Basis, and Significant Events:
When looking at performance results, you have to clarify the base currency and the valuation methodology used. If there have been any huge events (like major acquisitions of a fund manager, or merges of accounts) that might have affected performance, those should be noted too.
Basically, the idea is: no secrets. GIPS wants you to lay everything on the table.
Have you ever seen a fancy pitch deck that brags about a hypothetical 30-year track record? Under GIPS, you need to present a minimum of five years of annual performance to start. Each year thereafter, you’re required to build your track record until you land at a robust 10-year record. Once you’ve got 10 years, you keep it rolling on a cumulative basis.
But wait, do you have to wait for five years to claim compliance? If your firm is relatively new or if you’ve only got three years of data, GIPS allows you to present fewer years—provided you continue presenting performance going forward, up to that five-year threshold. Again, it’s all about establishing a credible and continuous record that prospective clients can rely on.
In practice, this timeline can be tricky if your firm has gone through expansions, acquisitions, or simply launched new composites. If you do have a “short” history, you can still say you conform to GIPS—but you must show all the history you have (like three years) and keep adding years until you reach the official minimum requirements.
At first, the difference might sound obvious: net-of-fees means after fees, gross-of-fees is before those pesky costs. But in GIPS, you have to be super transparent about which fees are included in each category. Clients reading your report should understand how management fees, commissions, and other transaction costs might impact the actual return they see in their pockets.
• Gross-of-Fees:
These returns typically exclude management fees but can include other trading costs. You must disclose which fees and costs are excluded. The point is not to mislead investors into thinking they’ll actually receive the gross return.
• Net-of-Fees:
These returns subtract management fees. Some firms might also remove performance-based fees where relevant. The clarity on precisely which fees have been subtracted is crucial.
To be honest, it can be embarrassing (and even borderline noncompliant) if an investor points out that your net-of-fees disclosures left out certain performance fees. So it’s good practice to detail all relevant fees your clients might face.
Sometimes a picture helps lock in how all these steps fit together. Here’s a little mermaid diagram that captures the high-level flow of establishing GIPS compliance for a firm’s composite performance:
flowchart LR A["Define the Firm"] --> B["Identify Composites"] B["Identify Composites"] --> C["Establish Performance Calculation <br/>Policies & Methodologies"] C["Establish Performance Calculation <br/>Policies & Methodologies"] --> D["Gather Data & Calculate Returns"] D["Gather Data & Calculate Returns"] --> E["Prepare Compliant Performance Presentation"] E["Prepare Compliant Performance Presentation"] --> F["Include All Mandatory Disclosures"]
So how do you ensure your final performance presentation stands up to the GIPS standard? Below are some often-cited best practices:
• Keep a Disclosure Checklist:
Many firms maintain a GIPS compliance checklist, ensuring they don’t forget details like benchmark rebalancing frequency or whether the composite started mid-year. If you like to be old-school, you can keep a big spreadsheet with all the items you need to disclose. Some folks I know actually tape a printed list right above their desk—whatever floats your boat.
• Maintain Consistency in Valuation:
GIPS generally requires fair value or a trade date-based valuation (unless local regulations say otherwise). The key is that you use consistent valuation methods and do so at least monthly (sometimes more frequently for funds with high turnover or large cash flows).
• Document Policies and Procedures:
GIPS compliance forces you to have documented policies for—well—just about everything. Seriously, everything from how you handle external cash flows to how you define portfolio discretion. Having it in writing prevents confusion, especially if your team or staff changes.
• Provide Ongoing Training:
GIPS compliance is never just a one-off exercise. Once you’re in, you’re in for the long haul. Make sure your staff (from portfolio managers to compliance folks) get periodic training on changes to GIPS guidelines, especially if you have a new version of GIPS quirks to consider.
Even with GIPS guidance, mistakes happen. Here are a few pitfalls I’ve seen folks fall into:
• Benchmark Misalignment
If a composite invests primarily in emerging markets, but you’re using a global developed index as a benchmark, GIPS might question the rationale. Proper matching between the composite and benchmark is essential.
• Forgotten Significant Events
Did your firm have a major reorganization, or were there large changes in leadership that impacted investment strategy? Failing to disclose that can raise red flags.
• Cherry-Picking Time Periods
GIPS absolutely prohibits you from only showing your best streak. You must show continuous performance for all years in compliance. No hiding the down years.
• Overlooking Internal Dispersion
GIPS sometimes requires a measure of internal dispersion—like a standard deviation of portfolio returns within a composite. Many folks simply forget to compute or present it, which can break compliance rules.
Imagine a firm called “Global Equities R Us,” established in 2021. By 2023, they have just two years of performance. They can still present these years in a GIPS-compliant report, but they must:
Or consider a scenario where a firm presents gross-of-fees returns that exclude anything but brokerage transaction charges. They must clearly define that the only costs removed from returns are transaction costs, and that no management or performance fees are taken out. This transparency up front helps clients avoid any unpleasant “Oh, the net might look different” surprises.
When it comes to your CFA Level III exam, you might see GIPS compliance come up in essay (constructed response) or item set questions. Some key points to remember:
• Exactly which disclosures are mandatory.
• The difference between net-of-fees and gross-of-fees returns.
• Minimum timeline requirements (the five-year rule and building to ten).
• Internal dispersion measures.
• Handling partial compliance or aggregating performance from prior firms.
• Identifying the “firm” in GIPS terms.
Watch out for scenario-based questions that test if you can identify noncompliant statements in fictional performance presentations. You might see a question describing a hypothetical firm ignoring composite definitions or using a random benchmark. Part of your job is to pinpoint the GIPS violations.
Time management tip: If you see a multi-part question on GIPS compliance, allocate your time to (1) identifying what’s missing (2) referencing the GIPS standard requirement (3) explaining how to correct it. Structured, bullet-point style answers often do well on exam grading.
If you want to dig deeper, check out the following:
• CFA Institute’s GIPS Handbook: an authoritative source for clarifying the nuances of GIPS.
• “GIPS Embracing Best Practices” – a CFA Institute webcast covering client reporting strategies.
• The Investment Performance Council (IPC) for GIPS: performance standards and best practices.
• Standard performance evaluation resources from the CFA Institute that expand on measurement nuances.
These resources not only help you master the intricacies of performance reporting but reinforce why GIPS compliance has become the gold standard around the globe.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.