Explore how equity managers engage with companies to encourage strong corporate governance, ethical practices, and sustainable strategies that align with long-term shareholder interests.
Most of us have heard stories of people who buy a couple of shares in a big-name company, then show up at the annual meeting just to catch a glimpse of the CEO or snag some free coffee. But investing can involve more than just showing up. When investors hold larger stakes—like institutional investors or dedicated equity managers—they can actually use their positions to create positive changes within the companies they own. This is the essence of shareholder engagement. Think of it as having a seat at the table, with a chance to talk to executives about everything from board structures to sustainability practices. Sound interesting? Let’s explore what shareholder engagement really means, how you can do it in a meaningful way, and what role the equity manager plays in this important process.
Shareholder engagement involves proactive communication and dialogue between the equity manager (acting on behalf of clients) and the company’s leadership. As an equity manager, you’re not just a passively invested bystander; rather, you’re in a position to influence decisions that can boost corporate value, enhance accountability, or even prompt leadership changes if necessary.
Sometimes, this engagement might be as simple as voting proxies in alignment with the investment strategy outlined in Section 1.3 (Income and Costs in Equity Portfolio Management) or discussing executive compensation structures. Other times, it might involve more formal activism, such as pushing the company to spin off a division or restructure its board.
• Alignment of Interests. By actively engaging, managers encourage companies to focus on long-term success instead of short-term profit.
• Risk Mitigation. Engagement can identify red flags—like high leverage or poor oversight—and prompt corrective steps before problems escalate.
• Value Creation. Good corporate governance often translates into stronger financial performance, especially when combined with effective ESG initiatives (see Section 1.7, ESG Integration in Equity Portfolios).
I once had the chance to observe an annual general meeting (AGM) for a large technology firm. One set of investors believed the company’s board was underqualified, especially regarding cybersecurity experience—well, that’s not something you want to undermine in a tech company. Over several months, these shareholders voiced their concerns in direct talks with management. Eventually, the company brought on two new board members with deep cybersecurity backgrounds. That’s a neat example of shareholders stepping in and making a difference not just for the company’s sake, but for everyone’s.
Stewardship means taking care of your clients’ capital in a responsible and forward-looking manner. An engaged equity manager sees stewardship as a core function—actively working to ensure that portfolio companies are being managed in the right way, for the right reasons.
Corporate governance refers to the system of rules, practices, and processes by which a company is directed and controlled. Effective governance includes:
• A well-structured board that provides knowledgeable oversight.
• Transparent policies on executive compensation.
• Ethical and sustainable business practices.
When governance is strong, companies typically make better strategic decisions, handle crises more effectively, and sustain long-term profitability.
Proxy voting is a fundamental tool for shareholder engagement. Managers use proxy votes to elect board members, approve or reject executive compensation packages, and support or oppose shareholder proposals. Think of it as casting ballots on major corporate matters. Deciding how to vote often involves analyzing company disclosures (like annual reports or sustainability statements) and aligning that vote with client objectives. For instance, if your clients prioritize responsible environmental policies, you might vote for a measure that demands more transparent carbon disclosure.
Let’s zero in on how an equity manager fits into all this. True engagement requires several steps:
Setting an Engagement Strategy. Before even analyzing companies, a manager should clarify how actively they plan to engage. Will they simply rely on proxy voting guidelines developed by third parties such as ISS (Institutional Shareholder Services)? Or will they adopt a more hands-on approach—meeting with boards, submitting proposals, and so on?
Analysis and Monitoring. An equity manager must stay informed about the firm’s financial health, corporate governance structures, strategic plans, and ethical standards. This monitoring might involve reading financial statements, scouring sustainability reports, or keeping an eye on news about potential controversies.
Communication with Management. Engagement might involve private meetings, conference calls, or letter-writing campaigns. During these interactions, managers aim for a constructive tone, seeking to understand management’s perspective and offer insight or criticism where needed.
Proxy Voting and Advocacy. Voting shares in alignment with client interests is a duty that cannot be overlooked. When issues are particularly significant, the manager might advocate publicly or encourage other shareholders to support a particular cause.
Ongoing Review. After any engagement effort—be it a single meeting or a multi-year activism campaign—managers review the results and refine their strategy for future engagements.
Below is a simple diagram illustrating the engagement cycle:
graph TB
A["Identify <br/> Engagement Issue"] --> B["Engagement <br/> Approach Formulation"]
B["Engagement <br/> Approach Formulation"] --> C["Dialogue <br/> with Company"]
C["Dialogue <br/> with Company"] --> D["Proxy Voting <br/> / Activism"]
D["Proxy Voting <br/> / Activism"] --> E["Monitor <br/> Outcomes"]
Shareholder activism is a more intense form of engagement. Activist investors often take large equity positions and then push for drastic changes. Sometimes, these changes can be constructive, like calling for new board talent that introduces fresh ideas or urging the sale of an underperforming division. Other times, the approach can be categorized as hostile, with activists publicly criticizing management and threatening proxy fights, or even lawsuits, if demands aren’t met.
• More Collaborative
• Emphasis on Long-Term Growth
• Often negotiates behind the scenes
• Confrontational
• Public Criticisms of Management
• May involve proxy fights or attempts to fire top executives
Managers should recognize that activism, when thoughtfully executed, often leads to improved governance and strategic renewal. However, if it’s purely confrontational, it may damage relationships and even harm the company’s reputation or short-term market sentiment.
Regulations on shareholder engagement differ across regions:
• In the U.S., the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sets guidelines on proxy disclosures, activist campaigns, and large shareholder reporting (e.g., Section 13D filings for owners of 5% or more).
• In Europe, the Shareholder Rights Directive encourages more active engagement and greater transparency regarding voting policies.
• In Asia, local regulations might emphasize different aspects, such as controlling foreign shareholder influence.
Equity managers need to be aware of these nuances. Sometimes, an investor with global portfolios must adopt different engagement strategies in different markets. For instance, direct activism might be more common in the U.S., while behind-the-scenes engagement could be more common in Japan due to cultural norms.
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors have become a key area of focus for many investors. In fact, Section 1.7 “ESG Integration in Equity Portfolios” outlines how these factors are increasingly integrated into the investment process. Shareholder engagement is a tool to press companies on ESG performance, from carbon emissions to labor practices.
• Climate Change and Environmental Disclosures. Investors are asking companies to measure and disclose greenhouse gas emissions, set net-zero targets, or detail action plans to mitigate climate risks.
• Social Issues. This may involve diversity and inclusion at all levels, supply chain ethics, or data privacy concerns.
• Governance Revisited. ESG factors circle right back to governance. Effective boards are typically more willing to address social and environmental issues in a transparent manner.
Will working with management actually boost returns for investors? Well, let’s say it definitely can. Research suggests that constructive engagement on governance or strategy can lead to lower risk profiles and potentially enhance returns. Though nothing is guaranteed, better-run companies typically have fewer scandals, adapt more smoothly to market changes, and use resources more effectively.
In some cases, engaged shareholders also help reduce the misalignment of incentives. For instance, if management is chasing short-term quarterly results by cutting beneficial long-term investments, active shareholders can put the brakes on those short-sighted decisions.
Engagement, especially the more direct and hands-on type, can be time-intensive. It requires:
• Skilled Staff: Specialists in corporate governance or specific sectors (e.g., technology or energy) to analyze company materials thoroughly.
• Time and Coordination: Continuous dialogue with management, checking proxy proposals, reading through legal documents, and coordinating with other institutional investors.
• Potential Costs: Legal fees, proxy solicitation costs, and staff hours.
Some managers choose to outsource aspects of engagement—particularly proxy voting analytics—to third-party providers. However, that can introduce a layer of distance between the investor and the company. Ultimately, a manager must decide how much time and energy to devote to direct engagement based on strategy and client preferences.
• Overreach: Sometimes, engagement can pressure management toward actions that might not be in the company’s best long-term interest.
• Conflicts of Interest: If certain stakeholders have competing interests, an activist strategy might benefit one group over others.
• Reputation Risk: Publicly criticizing management or forcing abrupt changes can harm relationships with corporate leadership and dampen future collaborations.
• Regulatory Missteps: Non-compliance with regional disclosure rules can lead to fines and negative publicity.
In the CFA Level III exam, especially in constructed-response or item-set questions, you may be asked to:
• Explain how engagement can align corporate behavior with investor objectives, referencing examples of board structure or sustainability improvements.
• Identify the steps an equity manager should undertake to implement a successful engagement strategy.
• Assess the trade-offs and potential challenges of activism versus more collaborative engagement.
• Integrate ESG concerns into an engagement scenario, possibly linking to other sections like 1.7 “ESG Integration in Equity Portfolios” or discussing the unique constraints of tax-exempt funds from Chapter 2.6.
• Evaluate a scenario in which an institutional investor must decide whether to launch a proxy fight or negotiate behind the scenes.
Be sure to outline both pros and cons when discussing activism. Pay attention to potential pitfalls such as reputational damage and excessive resource consumption. Practice writing concise, structured answers that incorporate practical examples—examiners often seek clarity and real-world application of theoretical concepts.
• CFA Institute. (n.d.). Global ESG Disclosure Standards for Investment Products.
• Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science.
• ISS (Institutional Shareholder Services) Proxy Voting Guidelines: https://www.issgovernance.com/policy
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.