Discover strategies for aligning executive compensation, handling liquidity events, protecting intellectual capital, and planning for succession and philanthropy, all while optimizing wealth for entrepreneurs and top executives.
You know, when I first advised an old friend of mine—an entrepreneur who was about to sell his tech startup—I remember saying, “Wow, your life’s about to change in a big way.” Truth is, I felt a bit overwhelmed for him. But it turned out that the real work was just beginning: deciding how to structure the sale, how to maintain alignment with his personal and family goals, how to manage taxes, you name it. He needed a roadmap for maximizing both his human and financial capital. If you think about it, that’s the story of our executive and entrepreneur clients. They create, lead, and sometimes exit big ventures, but a lot of them need guidance on preserving wealth and leveraging it for future endeavors, retirement, or philanthropy.
In this article, we’ll explore how to help entrepreneurs and executives realize their wealth potential based on the “sixth sense” we develop as Private Wealth Management professionals—blending personal financial goals with dynamic risk profiles. We’ll examine everything from balancing compensation packages for senior executives, to structuring the sale of a company, to philanthropic planning. And sure, it can get complicated—especially where stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs), or intangible assets come into play—but hopefully we can keep things clear (and maybe even a little fun) along the way.
For many executives, a big chunk of their personal balance sheet is tied directly to the company’s share price. The typical scenario might involve base salary, separate bonus incentives, RSUs, and stock options. Each component has a unique tax treatment, vesting schedule, and liquidity horizon. The best approach is to align these pay structures with the individual’s financial goals—both short-term and long-term.
Let’s assume you have a CEO named Kat, whose compensation package includes a mix of RSUs that vest over four years, plus discretionary bonuses that are partially deferred. Kat’s immediate targets might include paying for her children’s education (short-term) while also building retirement capital (long-term). As her advisor, you’d probably help her evaluate each compensation component’s liquidity and tax implications. For instance, an RSU vesting can suddenly trigger higher taxable income, while a deferred plan might reduce near-term taxes but postpone when she can access these funds.
Beyond taxes, there’s also the concept of maintaining alignment. For example, if Kat owns a bunch of company stock, is that in line with her risk profile? Is she effectively overexposed to a single equity? Does she require a formal plan for diversifying away from that single stock after some vesting period? These are big questions.
On that note, here’s a quick hypothetical formula (in KaTeX) for estimating potential after-tax proceeds from a vested award of RSUs:
where \(r\) is an assumed reinvestment rate and \(n\) is the number of years the funds remain invested post-vesting. By laying out these estimates, you and your executive client can plan how each component of compensation supports their personal wealth goals.
Entrepreneurs often face “liquidity events” that can be both exciting and intimidating: selling a thriving startup, merging with a competitor, or going for an IPO. The result is frequently a one-time influx of substantial cash (or publicly traded shares). The structure of such a transaction can impact taxes, control, and future business involvement. We might look into earn-outs to tie part of the purchase price to the company’s performance post-sale. Or, if owners want some continued upside, they could retain a minority stake.
One buddy of mine—I’ll call him Marco—had poured his heart into a software startup for seven years. The acquisition deal was a huge moment, but we had to figure out how to mitigate a massive tax hit. We explored an installment sale in which the buyer paid a portion up front, then additional payments over several years. This approach spread out his gains, potentially reducing the overall tax burden in any single year. We also introduced the idea of forming a trust to hold part of the equity; that shifted some future appreciation out of his estate, which could be beneficial for estate tax planning.
The moral of the story? Proper structuring can significantly improve the real net proceeds an entrepreneur sees.
On the executive side, many large firms offer additional goodies: deferred compensation, supplemental executive retirement plans (SERPs), employee stock purchase plans (ESPPs), and so on. Understanding these benefits is key for an advisor because each plan has unique characteristics.
• Deferred compensation: This allows you to push back income until retirement or another future date, providing potential tax advantages.
• SERPs: Function like pensions on steroids, giving executives extra retirement benefits beyond standard corporate plans.
• ESPPs: Let executives buy company stock, often at a discount, building a bigger equity stake in the firm.
From a wealth manager’s perspective, the challenge is weaving these benefits into a broader financial plan. You might say, “Let’s see how your SERP payouts will mesh with your personal savings and investments.” Or, if the client has multiple perquisites, it’s important to look for any overlap or synergy among them. Some executives can face complexities about when to “pull the trigger” on different benefits, potentially triggering large tax obligations at once.
Entrepreneurs typically have intangible property—patents, trademarks, software code, or proprietary processes—that support their firm’s revenue. These intangible assets can be licensed, sold, or otherwise leveraged. An inventor might receive royalty streams from licensing her patent. A software founder might treat the code base as collateral for a line of credit to finance expansions.
For instance, I once saw a biotech founder (call her Dr. Sam) license her new drug patent to a major pharmaceutical company, generating consistent royalty income. The structure was fairly complex, but we introduced a protective legal framework—like an IP holding company—that reduced liability exposure and provided clear documentation of ownership. The ultimate outcome? Dr. Sam got predictable cash flow, balanced risk across multiple deals, and retained ownership in her broader portfolio of intellectual property.
If you’re advising entrepreneurs, you’ve probably had clients ask, “Should I invest more personal savings into my business, or keep that money for the family’s lifestyle?” It’s the classic debate: double down on your business or preserve personal liquidity. The business is often an extension of the entrepreneur’s identity—like their child, if you will—so the emotional impulses can be strong.
You might talk about “worst-case scenarios,” like a big market downturn or supply chain headaches. If an entrepreneur invests too heavily in the business and leaves too little for personal liquidity, they could end up in a severe cash crunch, forced to sell equity at an inopportune time. So, we typically encourage them to define target capital allocations for the business, personal living expenses, an emergency fund, and longer-term growth investments. Approaches might include:
• Setting up a high-yield reserve or line of credit for business expansions.
• Scheduling periodic “dividends” from the company to cover personal needs.
• Creating trust structures to shield some personal capital from business risks.
Finding the balance requires understanding the entrepreneur’s risk tolerance, personal wealth goals, and the stage of their business cycle.
Now, let’s talk concentration risk. Executives often hold too much wealth in employer stock, while business owners might have almost everything tied up in a single firm. From a portfolio management standpoint, that’s a huge red flag. If the employer or the private venture fails, you face a massive drawdown in personal net worth.
For publicly traded stock, a structured forward sale can lock in a price for a portion of shares, providing downside protection. Another approach is collaring (using options to lock in an equity price range). Or, if the client is allowed to, you can systematically sell down shares upon vesting and reinvest in diversified assets.
For private businesses, you might encourage partial sales to an external investor or management buyouts (MBOs). Even philanthropic vehicles (like charitable remainder trusts) can help reduce concentration risk while supporting social impact initiatives. That’s the multi-dimensional approach we considered back in Chapter 5 on preserving wealth: identifying, measuring, and managing concentration risk is crucial.
If you recall from Chapter 7 on “Transferring the Wealth,” the big question is often: “Do I want to pass the business on to my kids, or sell it and give them the proceeds?” This is where the concept of succession planning comes in. The typical routes are:
• Management Buyout (MBO): The existing management team takes control by purchasing the company. Often works if kids aren’t interested, but the entrepreneur wants to keep continuity of management.
• External Buyer: Could be a competitor, a private equity group, or a strategic investor.
• Generational Transfer: If the children or other relatives are keen to step into the business, you can structure a gift or partial sale that transitions ownership while the founder is still alive.
Each route calls for a full understanding of valuation, taxes, and the founder’s personal objectives. Sometimes, partial monetization—selling a portion for liquidity while keeping a stake—makes sense.
It might sound surprising, but many entrepreneurs and executives want more than just a big bank account. They want to give something back: philanthropic foundations, charitable trusts, or direct donations. When you incorporate generosity into someone’s wealth plan, not only does it help them fulfill personal passions, but it can offer tax advantages as well.
For instance, establishing a donor-advised fund (DAF) lets executives make a big charitable contribution in a high-earning year, receive an immediate tax deduction, but then distribute funds to charities over time. Or an entrepreneur can create a private charitable foundation to involve family members in grantmaking decisions, as we discussed in Chapter 7. This ensures their legacy extends beyond just money—it also influences the next generation’s values and philanthropic mindset.
Below is a simple Mermaid diagram illustrating how entrepreneurs and executives often transition their human and financial capital over time. It begins with building intangible capital (e.g., expertise, brand, or IP), leads to compensation or a liquidity event, and eventually leads to diversification or legacy planning.
flowchart LR A["Build <br/>Expertise/IP"] --> B["Earn Compensation <br/> & Equity"] B --> C["Liquidity Event <br/> (Sale, IPO, etc.)"] C --> D["Diversify <br/>(Trusts, Investments)"] D --> E["Legacy & Philanthropy"]
From intangible assets to philanthropic endeavors, each stage requires deliberate planning, a forward-looking mindset, and careful alignment with the client’s broader life goals.
• Tech Entrepreneur (Venture Sale): A founder sells her cybersecurity firm for $100 million. She structures the deal with an earn-out to reduce upfront taxes and keep some upside if revenue targets are met. She invests a portion of the proceeds into a charitable lead trust, supporting STEM education programs in her local community, while the remainder is mapped out over a 20-year retirement plan.
• Executive with RSUs and SERP: A CFO is due to receive a large vesting of RSUs that coincide with SERP payouts. By carefully timing the SERP distributions, the CFO avoids a huge single-year tax spike. Furthermore, they set up a diversification plan to systematically sell shares over five years, freeing up capital for other investments and philanthropic goals.
• Best Practices
– Create a financial “blueprint” that integrates short-term liquidity and long-term retirement needs.
– Understand each compensation plan’s fine print (vesting schedules, tax rules, transferability).
– Use scenario planning: “What if the stock falls 40%?” “What if we see a sudden buyout?”
• Common Pitfalls
– Over-concentration in a single stock or business.
– Underestimating tax implications of lump-sum payouts.
– Neglecting intangible assets or failing to protect them legally.
• Strategies to Overcome
– Gradual share sell-down, option-based hedging, or partial liquidity events.
– Collaboration with tax professionals for synergy among compensation, estate, and philanthropic strategies.
– Build an IP protection framework: licensing agreements, IP holding companies, or specialized insurance.
In a CFA Level III exam context, be ready to see item-set questions or constructed-response prompts where you assess an executive’s compensation mix or propose a strategy for an entrepreneur with a pending liquidity event. They might ask for a recommended approach to reduce concentration risk or how to optimize philanthropic giving. Keep in mind the following:
• Use the goals-based perspective: Identify the client’s personal and business objectives, then design a comprehensive plan.
• Incorporate risk management (hedging, diversification) for executives and entrepreneurs who hold large, single-company exposures.
• Reference relevant standards from the CFA Institute Code of Ethics if a scenario touches on transparency or potential conflicts of interest.
• Provide thorough analysis of tax implications and timing issues with different compensation instruments (like options, RSUs, and earn-outs).
• Show how philanthropic structures can serve both altruistic aims and timing of tax deductions.
The more you can link these strategies to an integrated wealth plan, the more likely you’ll nail the exam answers.
• Restricted Stock Units (RSUs): Equity compensation where company shares are released (vest) after certain conditions or time frames.
• Stock Options: Rights (but not obligations) to purchase shares at a set price (strike price) within a set timeframe.
• Earn-Out: A contractual arrangement where part of the purchase price is contingent on the future performance of the business.
• Deferred Compensation: Portions of compensation that are paid out at a later date, reducing current taxable income.
• Management Buyout (MBO): A transaction where existing management acquires the company or a controlling share.
• Structured Forward Sale: A hedging tool that lets major shareholders lock in a future share sale price to protect against downside risk.
• Liquidity Event: A transaction converting illiquid ownership interests into cash (sale, IPO, recapitalization).
• IP (Intellectual Property): Creations of the mind—like inventions or code—that provide a competitive edge and potential income streams.
• Kaplan, R. (2018). Investing in Entrepreneurs: A Strategic Approach for Advisors. Entrepreneur Finance Press.
• McKinsey & Company: “Executive Compensation and Long-Term Value Creation.”
• Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (2020). The Venture Capital Cycle. MIT Press.
• Garratt, C. (2021). Private Company Valuation: Techniques and Best Practices. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance.
• Fidelity: “RSUs, Options, and Executive Strategies” (https://www.fidelity.com)
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.