Learn how swap curves function as critical benchmarks for institutional investors, how swap rates are determined and interpreted, and how swap spreads reflect market perceptions of credit, liquidity, and policy risk.
Enhance Your Learning:
I remember way back when someone first explained to me what an interest rate swap was, and I thought, “Um, that sounds pretty fancy.” Swaps seemed super-technical and complicated to me, but it’s actually not all that scary once you get the gist. In the simplest terms, a plain vanilla interest rate swap lets two parties exchange a fixed interest rate payment for a floating rate payment, all based on some notional principal (which doesn’t usually change hands).
In modern bond and derivative markets, the swap curve—essentially, the plot of par swap rates over various maturities—often serves as a preferred benchmark for institutional investors, sometimes outranking even government bond curves. This preference stems from the swap curve’s relevance to the credit markets and its representation of interbank or institutional borrowing rates. A closer look at swap curves and swap spreads can really open our eyes to how big players price risk, especially when it comes to corporate bonds, derivatives, and advanced hedging strategies.
Before we unpack the swap curve, let’s make sure we fully understand the most common structure: the plain vanilla interest rate swap. Picture two parties:
• Party A pays a fixed rate (the swap’s fixed rate).
• Party B pays a floating rate (often tied to SOFR or another benchmark, such as 3-month LIBOR in older swaps).
While the notional principal itself typically does not change hands, the interest payments do. The fixed rate side tallies up payments based on a constant rate times the notional. The floating side resets periodically (say, every three months) to reflect the current floating rate. If we assume that at the swap inception date both sides have equal present value, the fixed rate is chosen such that the swap’s initial value is zero—that’s our par swap rate.
In a par interest rate swap, the fixed rate is selected so that the sum of the expected floating payments, discounted back to present value, exactly equals the present value of fixed payments. If we label the discount factors as P(1), P(2), …, P(n) for each time period, we can denote the par swap rate (S) using a simplified discrete formula:
Here, P(n) is the discount factor for the final swap payment date, and \(\sum_{t=1}^{n} P(t)\) is the sum of discount factors across the coupon periods. The synergy of discount factors and forward rates ensures that the initial swap value is zero.
Below is a simplified Mermaid diagram illustrating a typical plain vanilla interest rate swap cash flow structure:
flowchart LR A["Party A <br/> (Pays Fixed)"] -- Fixed Rate --> B["Party B <br/> (Pays Floating)"] B -- Floating Rate (e.g. SOFR) --> A
This structure helps both parties achieve their desired interest rate exposure. Maybe Party A wants to lock in a fixed rate, while Party B prefers to pay fixed and receive floating.
When we connect those par swap rates across different maturities—2-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, 30-year—we get the swap curve. Much like the yield curve for government bonds, the swap curve shows how longer maturities generally command higher rates due to increased risk and the time value of money.
But unlike government bond yields, these swap rates embed an entirely different sense of credit risk and liquidity conditions. Government debt, at least in theory, is considered default-free (or close to it, depending on the jurisdiction). The interbank market, on the other hand, assumes some measure of credit risk between commercial banks. That’s why, historically, folks looked at LIBOR-based swaps to glean a sense of bank credit risk. Now, with the shift to SOFR or other risk-free reference rates, the credit element can be more nuanced.
A swap spread is basically the difference between:
• The fixed rate on a swap with a given maturity, and
• The yield of a government bond of the same maturity.
So a 5-year swap spread would be the 5-year par swap rate minus the yield on a 5-year government bond. It’s a handy measure, because the government bond is seen as lower risk. The swap can trade at a rate above or below that government bond yield, reflecting the additional risk (or certain market conditions) priced into interbank lending.
Let’s say the 5-year government bond yield is 3.2% and the 5-year par swap rate is 3.45%. The swap spread is 25 bps (i.e., 3.45% – 3.2%). Or if at some point the par swap rate is below the comparable government yield, that can indicate an unusual market environment—perhaps heightened demand for receiving fixed in swaps, or other liquidity constraints.
It’s not just about credit risk in a vacuum. Swap spreads can move around for many reasons:
• Interbank credit risk perceptions: If banks worry about others’ creditworthiness, the floating side or general risk embedded in swaps can widen spreads.
• Liquidity in the swap versus the government bond market: If the swap market is more liquid, ironically, that can compress spreads. On the flip side, if government bonds become scarce, government yields can drop, and spreads widen.
• Supply and demand for floating-rate liabilities: Some institutions might need to pay fixed or receive floating, and if there’s a one-sided demand, that can shift the par swap rate up or down.
• Regulatory changes and central bank policies: Central bank signals often ripple into short-term rates, which in turn affect the floating rate used in swaps. Meanwhile, changes in bank regulations (e.g., capital requirements) can push swap spreads around.
A wider swap spread can indicate stress in the banking sector or the broader credit market. During the 2008 financial crisis, swap spreads spiked dramatically because, well, the world was freaking out about bank solvency. A significant jump in spreads signals that the market demands a higher premium for interbank credit risk.
After the financial crisis, the market recognized that LIBOR wasn’t truly risk-free. Central banks introduced new reference rates like SOFR in the U.S., SONIA in the U.K., €STR in the Eurozone, and so forth. These rates are generally considered nearly risk-free because they’re based on overnight transactions that carry minimal credit risk scrounged from actual market data.
So when banks and other institutions run their models to discount future swap cash flows, many do so based on the OIS (Overnight Indexed Swap) curve. Why does that matter? Because if you’re discounting future payoffs at something close to the “risk-free” rate (the OIS rate), you’re capturing a better sense of what those cash flows are truly worth in an environment with minimal credit risk.
This leads to more accurate valuations—particularly for collateralized swaps. If you have a swap that’s fully collateralized, the collateral effectively lowers the counterparty risk, which justifies OIS as the discount rate.
Swap spreads aren’t just a theoretical concept. Managers use them in all sorts of ways:
• Hedging interest rate risk: If you hold a portfolio of corporate bonds, you might use interest rate swaps to convert part of that exposure to floating or fixed, locking in certain spreads.
• Taking a view on credit conditions: A manager might buy (receive) fixed in a swap if they believe credit spreads will narrow, in hopes that the swap’s fixed rate will drop.
• Relative value trades: Some strategies involve simultaneously buying a corporate bond and entering a swap position to isolate certain spread differentials.
Imagine you have a 5-year bond hedge in place using an interest rate swap. You’re paying fixed at 3.50% and receiving floating. Suddenly, the 5-year swap spread tightens by 10 bps, meaning the par swap rate for that maturity might drop from 3.50% to 3.40%. Depending on how your net exposures are structured, you could profit if you were on the right side of that move (e.g., if you’re receiving fixed in the swap, a drop in swap rates increases the swap’s value to you).
In the exam setting, you might be asked to calculate the mark-to-market value of that swap given the new 10 bp difference, or to articulate how that affects your overall hedge.
Some of the wildest swings in swap spreads occurred during crisis times. The 2008 global financial meltdown was the poster child for this phenomenon: banks refused to lend to each other without a hefty credit premium. Swap spreads ballooned, reflecting fear of default rather than the typical liquidity premium. Similarly, European sovereign debt turmoil in the early 2010s saw periods of intense variability in swap spreads, especially for euro-denominated swaps, as the markets worried about credit risk in certain EU members.
It’s worth glancing at other episodes—like the COVID-19 volatility in early 2020—where central bank actions (like massive Fed intervention) dramatically influenced short-term credit markets. These interventions often show up in OIS rates, which can then factor back into how swaps are valued and how big the swap spreads become.
While swap curves may be straightforward conceptually, here are a few issues that sometimes trip people up:
• Confusing par swap rates with forward rates: Always remember that your par swap rate is a single fixed rate for the entire life of the swap, set so that the swap starts with zero net present value. Forward rates are an internal building block used in the derivation.
• Ignoring collateralization effects: If a swap is fully collateralized, the discount rate should be based on OIS to reflect minimal credit risk. Failing to do so misprices the swap.
• Overlooking netting arrangements: Swaps are usually part of a broader set of derivatives. Netting can reduce net credit exposure, and ignoring that might lead to an exaggerated sense of your credit risk.
• Failing to watch central bank signals: The shape of the OIS curve is heavily influenced by policy rates. If you see a big shift in monetary policy, expect it to ripple into swap rates and their spreads.
Anyway, the moral of the story is, keep an eye on what’s backing your swap. Are you using a risk-free rate as your discount factor, or are you using some interbank-based rate like old-school LIBOR? The difference can be subtle but critical in a real-world portfolio valuation scenario.
Swap curves and swap spreads may sound like advanced technicalities, but in the labyrinth of fixed income markets, they’re central to how big players price and hedge interest rate and credit exposures. Understanding the logic behind par swap rates—where they come from and how they compare to government yields—gives us a powerful perspective on market sentiment, credit risk, and liquidity dynamics.
If we keep these fundamentals in mind (like the role of OIS discounting or how a 10 bp move in the 5-year swap spread could upset a hedge), we’ll be much better placed to answer the tough, scenario-based questions we often see in the CFA exam. It can also guide us practically when managing real portfolios, especially because the swap market remains one of the largest and most liquid arenas in global finance.
Keep exploring through practice item sets, especially paying attention to how swap valuation might shift as the floating rate references move or as credit conditions tighten (widen spreads) or loosen (tighten spreads). And remember: real-world swaps come with all sorts of bells and whistles—caps, floors, various reference rates, collateral requirements—so always read the fine print.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.