Explore how floating-rate notes (FRNs) and step-up bonds function, their valuation nuances, and key risk-return considerations in CFA® Level II fixed income.
Enhance Your Learning:
When interest rates are shifting faster than you can say “yield curve,” investors often gravitate toward bonds that can help them navigate rate volatility. Floating-rate notes (FRNs) are one such choice, with variable coupons tied to a benchmark. Step-up bonds also offer intriguing features—coupons that rise at predetermined times or after specific events. These instruments can be a lifesaver in certain market conditions but come with complexities that require thoughtful analysis.
Let’s untangle the operational details of FRNs and step-up bonds, walk through some examples, and consider the risk-return implications. We’ll wrap up with a short glossary, references for further reading, and a practice quiz to help you test your knowledge.
Floating-rate notes, or FRNs, are bonds whose coupon payments reset periodically based on a reference rate plus a spread. The reference rate might be an interbank lending rate like SOFR, EURIBOR, or—back in the day—LIBOR. The spread (also called margin) compensates the investor for the issuer’s credit risk and other market factors.
Here’s a simplified formula for an FRN’s coupon payment:
\bigl(\text{Reference Index} + \text{Spread}\bigr) \times \text{Par Value} \times \frac{\text{Days in Period}}{\text{Day Count Basis}} $$
Because the coupon resets, FRNs typically track short-term interest rates more closely than fixed-rate bonds. That means if the reference rate rises, future coupon payments are higher—helping investors keep pace with a rising rate environment.
I recall the first time I really dug into an FRN’s prospectus, and it felt like deciphering code: “Wait, so the interest changes… every three months?” Eventually, I realized that was the whole point—investors holding FRNs don’t have to worry quite as much about interest rate risk because the coupon moves along with the market. But you know, if rates plummet, so do those future coupons.
Historically, LIBOR (the London Interbank Offered Rate) was the most common reference rate. However, due to manipulation scandals and methodology critiques, global markets have transitioned to alternative rates like SOFR in the US, SONIA in the UK, and ESTR in the Eurozone.
Key points about these new reference rates:
• They are often based on actual overnight transactions, making them more robust.
• They do not always incorporate term credit risk in the same way LIBOR did.
• The transition has been gradual, often requiring fallback language in bond documentation—so if your FRN’s primary reference rate fails, there’s a legal blueprint for which secondary rate to use.
An FRN’s spread reflects the issuer’s risk profile in the market. Issuers with stronger credit typically offer lower spreads because they represent a lower credit risk. Conversely, if you see a floating-rate note with a juicy spread, that might mean the market perceives a higher chance of default, or the issuer is less liquid, and so it offers more compensation.
Most FRNs reset their coupon quarterly or semiannually. Right before a reset date, the price of an FRN will typically be near par (plus accrued interest) because its coupon is about to align with the new interest rate environment. Between resets, the bond’s price may drift slightly based on market expectations of the next reset.
If we consider a quarterly-reset FRN indexed to SOFR plus 200 basis points, the coupon might look something like:
• Jan 1 – Mar 31: Coupon = (SOFR as of Jan 1 + 2.00%) × Par
• Apr 1 – Jun 30: Coupon = (SOFR as of Apr 1 + 2.00%) × Par
• and so forth…
When rates are climbing, each quarter’s coupon can jump to reflect the higher SOFR. On the flip side, in a low-rate environment, an FRN might seem disappointing compared to a fixed-rate bond that locked in a higher rate at issuance.
To value an FRN, you discount its coupon and principal cash flows by the appropriate discount rates (often zero-coupon rates or forward rates). However, the coupon changes with each reset, so between resets, the FRN’s price typically remains close to par if the issuer’s credit quality remains stable.
If you’re curious to see a simplistic representation, check out the following Mermaid diagram of basic FRN structure (remember, it’s just a schematic—real deals can be more complex):
flowchart LR A["Issuer <br/> (Borrower)"] --> B["FRN <br/> Instrument"] B --> C["Investor <br/> (Lender)"] B --> D["Periodic <br/> Coupon = <br/> Reference Rate + Spread"]
Step-up bonds have coupons that increase (“step up”) at predetermined dates or upon certain triggers, such as a downgrade in the issuer’s credit rating. They’re slightly different from FRNs: whereas FRNs peg the coupon to a floating index, step-ups have planned increments that can be listed in the bond’s prospectus.
Think of it like a job contract that promises you a specific raise at certain anniversaries—except that for a bond, you’re the one granting a “raise” to the bond’s coupon payments.
Fixed step-up schedules are relatively straightforward: the bond’s coupon might start at 3% for the first three years, then jump to 4% for the next two years, and finally land at 5% until maturity. These changes usually occur on specific dates—no external trigger required.
Contingent step-ups tie coupon adjustments to external events or credit-related triggers. A common scenario is if the issuer’s credit rating is downgraded below a certain threshold, the coupon increases by a certain margin. That compensates investors for the heightened credit risk.
In practice, contingent step-ups can become quite complicated, especially if they involve multiple rating triggers, partial increments, or other performance-related criteria.
The trick with step-up bonds is to model each future coupon stream under the assumption that the coupon rate changes. For a fixed step-up, the schedule is known, so you discount each coupon at an appropriate yield:
For contingent step-ups, you often must attach probabilities to different rating outcomes or triggers, then weight the associated coupon streams accordingly.
If that sounds complicated—well, it can be! Step-up bonds might have sweeteners that look great on paper, but you always have to ensure you’re accounting for all potential scenarios.
Suppose you have a 10-year step-up bond with a $1,000 par value. For the first 5 years, the coupon is 3%; for the last 5 years, it “steps up” to 4%. Ignoring day count complexities, you might break out the present value calculation as follows:
• Calculate the present value of an annuity of 3% on $1,000 for 5 years.
• Calculate the present value of an annuity of 4% on $1,000 for the following 5 years.
• Discount the 4% portion from year 6–10 back to time zero.
• Don’t forget the final principal redemption at maturity.
In real-world analysis, you’d incorporate yield curve information (from Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 references) to discount each cash flow at the appropriate segment of the curve. Also, if you’re dealing with contingent step-ups, you layer in probabilities for each scenario.
FRNs can outperform fixed-rate bonds in a rising rate environment because their coupons adjust upward. Conversely, if rates remain stagnant or decline, floating-rate coupons might look less appealing versus a fixed rate that was locked under more favorable conditions.
Credit risk still matters—if the issuer’s credit deteriorates, the spread demanded by the market may widen, eroding the FRN’s price. Even though interest rate risk is reduced, FRNs retain exposure to credit and liquidity risk.
Step-up bonds offer coupon increases at known times or after events that reflect credit risk. They can be beneficial if the investor expects the issuer’s standing to weaken, or if they simply want a structured coupon increment. On the other hand, forecasting all possible coupon paths in contingent step-up structures can be cumbersome. That complexity can lead to mispricing—sometimes you get a better deal, other times you might be overpaying for the “step-up promise.”
Both FRNs and step-up bonds rely heavily on spread assumptions. A step-up might look like a good deal if the issuer’s credit risk is expected to remain stable. But if the market prices a higher risk, the yield demanded on the bond will rise, potentially lowering the bond’s market price. Similarly, an FRN spread that once seemed adequate might later look anemic if the issuer’s fundamentals worsen.
• Floating-rate notes reset coupon payments regularly based on a benchmark plus a spread.
• The LIBOR-to-SOFR transition has big implications for older FRNs, requiring fallback provisions and adjustments.
• Step-up bonds have increasing coupons at set intervals or upon certain triggers.
• Both instruments offer ways to manage interest rate or credit risk, but neither is “risk-free.”
• Proper valuation involves discounting expected future cash flows based on likely interest rate scenarios (for FRNs) or coupon schedules and event triggers (for step-up bonds).
• Reference Rate (Benchmark): An externally published interest rate index (like SOFR) used to calculate a floating-rate coupon.
• Spread: The additional margin added to the reference rate in an FRN, or the premium in the yield that reflects credit risk and other market factors.
• Step-Up Coupon: A coupon schedule that increases at predetermined intervals or after certain external triggers.
• Reset Date: The specific date(s) when an FRN’s coupon is recalculated based on the latest reference rate.
Here’s a simple schematic showing how a step-up bond’s coupon can evolve over time:
flowchart LR A["Year 1 - 3 <br/> 3% Coupon"] --> B["Year 4 - 5 <br/> 4% Coupon"] B --> C["Year 6 - 10 <br/> 5% Coupon"]
• CFA Institute Level II Curriculum, especially sections on Floating-Rate and Structured Products.
• Jha, Siddhartha. “Interest Rate Markets.” Provides deeper insight into FRN valuation.
• Official statements from ARRC (Alternative Reference Rates Committee) addressing the LIBOR-to-SOFR transition.
• For FRNs, make sure you know how to calculate the coupon reset timelines and how to discount the future cash flows if required.
• Don’t forget that the spread in an FRN might change if the issuer’s credit quality changes. The spread in the bond’s indenture might be fixed, but the market can widen or narrow its demanded yield.
• For step-up bonds, especially contingent ones, practice walking through different scenarios. Understand how to apply discount factors to each segment of the cash flow timeline.
• Always watch out for day count conventions (see Chapter 2.2) and references to yield curve construction (Chapter 4).
You’ve now gotten a taste of how floating-rate notes and step-up bonds can fit into a portfolio strategy. Let’s see if you’re ready to tackle some practice questions.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.