Explore how to build pro forma financial statements under IFRS or US GAAP using scenario analysis for a mid-sized manufacturing firm. Learn to incorporate raw material price fluctuations, changing FX rates, capital expansions, and intangible asset valuations into forecasts.
Let’s say you’re asked to craft a set of pro forma financial statements for a mid-sized manufacturing firm—call it GlobalGears Inc. GlobalGears produces specialized gears for automotive suppliers and has recently expanded its operations overseas. The management is eager to forecast how the next few years will look under different economic conditions. Trust me, I’ve been there before—sometimes you think you have everything nailed down, then you realize a spike in raw material prices can turn your happy forecast into a headache.
In this vignette, we’ll walk through GlobalGears’ partial historical financials, incorporate expansions and IFRS vs. US GAAP classification nuances, then create multiple scenario-based forecasts: one adverse scenario (bumping up the cost of raw materials) and one favorable scenario (enjoying better foreign exchange rates). Along the way, we’ll see how liquidity, leverage, and coverage ratios can swing, and what that implies for the company’s cash flows and external financing needs.
Below is a simplified snapshot of GlobalGears’ recent financial information (in USD thousands). This data is condensed for illustration.
Historical Income Statement (Partial):
Historical Balance Sheet (Partial):
Key Footnotes:
Pro forma statements help us see where GlobalGears might stand in the future. We’ll construct them by:
Projecting Revenue:
• Management estimates a baseline 8% annual growth, assuming stable demand.
• The expansion in Asia might boost revenue by 2–3 percentage points, but that depends on exchange rates.
Estimating Expenses:
• Historical gross margin is 40%. We’ll assume this stays relatively stable in normal conditions.
• We must account for the likely rise in labor costs or raw materials if we suspect inflationary pressures.
• SG&A might increase in line with the expansion, perhaps at the same 8% baseline growth.
Considering Depreciation and Amortization:
• With new leased assets under IFRS 16, we’ll add both a right-of-use asset depreciation and an interest cost for the lease liability.
• Under US GAAP, the firm might classify the lease differently; in an operating lease, the expense will mostly show up as rent expense.
Assessing Interest Expense and Capital Structure:
• GlobalGears has $20,000 of long-term debt. The new expansions may require additional external financing if internal cash flows aren’t sufficient.
• If the company takes on more debt, interest expense will rise, affecting coverage ratios.
Accounting for Taxes:
• We’ll keep the 25% effective tax rate assumption unless new incentives or changes are introduced.
Forecasting Cash Flow and Working Capital:
• We’ll estimate changes in accounts receivable, accounts payable, and inventory proportionally to revenue or COGS changes.
• Capital expenditures (CapEx) for expansions can heavily influence our free cash flow (FCF).
One reason forecasting drives me a bit bonkers is that IFRS and US GAAP can treat certain items differently, drastically changing our financial picture:
• Lease Classification:
– IFRS 16: All material leases appear on the balance sheet, recognized as right-of-use assets and lease liabilities.
– US GAAP (ASC 842): A lease could be operating or finance. Operating leases still generate off-balance sheet illusions if you’re not careful with analyzing them, though you’d see them in footnotes.
• Intangible Assets:
– If the patents the company acquires have unlimited life, IFRS demands annual impairment tests. Under US GAAP, indefinite-lived intangibles also require annual impairment reviews, but the methodology can differ (step testing, etc.).
– If intangible assets are finite, both IFRS and US GAAP require systematic amortization over their useful life.
• Segment Disclosures:
– IFRS requires segment results based on internal management information, while US GAAP similarly demands an approach that mirrors what the chief decision maker uses. The difference can lie in the details of how transfer pricing or overhead allocations are reported.
We want to compare at least two alternative futures for GlobalGears:
Adverse Scenario: Raw Material Price Increase
• Suppose steel and related materials cost 10% more next year. This might shrink gross margin from 40% to 35%.
• Meanwhile, customers push back on price hikes, so revenue grows more slowly (maybe 5% instead of 8%).
• The expansion plan might still go ahead, but with costlier raw materials, inventory spending goes up.
Favorable Scenario: Improved FX Rates
• Exchange rates in key Asian markets move in GlobalGears’ favor—say a 5% currency tailwind.
• Revenue grows 10% this time, thanks to a better environment and stable raw material costs.
• Production remains efficient, keeping the 40% gross margin alive (or possibly slightly increasing it if the local currency denominated costs are cheaper).
We’ll illustrate these different paths with a simple schematic:
graph LR A["Scenario Analysis <br/>Start"] --> B["Modify Key <br/>Assumptions"]; B --> C["Forecast <br/>Revenue, COGS, and <br/>Expenses"]; C --> D["Pro Forma <br/>Financial Statements"]; D --> E["Calculate <br/>Ratios"];
Let’s do a quick pass on how revenue and COGS might look under each scenario for the upcoming year:
• Baseline Forecast (No major changes)
– Revenue: $108,000 (8% growth from $100,000)
– COGS: $64,800 (60% of revenue)
– Gross Profit: $43,200
• Adverse Scenario
– Revenue: $105,000 (5% growth)
– COGS: $68,250 (65% of revenue, reflecting higher raw material costs)
– Gross Profit: $36,750
• Favorable Scenario
– Revenue: $110,000 (10% growth, boosted by FX)
– COGS: $66,000 (60% of revenue still)
– Gross Profit: $44,000
As you can see, small changes in growth rates and margin assumptions produce very different operating results.
We can’t stop at the income statement. As we incorporate the new right-of-use assets or intangible acquisitions, the balance sheet changes can transform your ratio analysis. You might find that:
• Liquidity Ratios:
– The current ratio or quick ratio may worsen in the adverse scenario because inventory or payables might rise beyond the manageable range.
– In the favorable scenario, a higher cash balance and greater sales might improve liquidity.
• Leverage Ratios:
– Adding lease liabilities (finance leases under IFRS 16 or finance lease classification under US GAAP) can increase the debt-to-equity ratio.
– If raw materials spike and the firm needs external financing, the total debt might balloon, pushing up leverage.
• Coverage Ratios:
– Interest coverage (EBIT / Interest Expense) might shrink in the adverse case if EBIT falls and debt remains high.
– A favorable scenario might yield stronger EBIT, raising coverage metrics and impressing lenders.
Forecasting infiltration doesn’t end with the income statement. It seeps into your cash flow statement, too:
• Operating Cash Flow (CFO):
– If net income drops, CFO can suffer. But watch for changes in working capital (like a buildup in receivables or inventory) that might further lower CFO.
– Conversely, a favorable exchange rate scenario might help reduce local costs or push up revenue, thereby strengthening CFO.
• Capital Expenditures (CapEx):
– GlobalGears has expansion plans. Even if the outlook turns grim, some expansions are contractual. Management must spend on PP&E or intangible assets.
– A shortfall in CFO might force the company to tap additional debt or equity financing, potentially raising interest costs or diluting existing shareholders.
• External Financing:
– If your coverage ratios dip below covenants, lenders might impose stricter terms or higher interest rates.
– In a happy environment, strong CFO might reduce the firm’s reliance on external capital.
It’s easy to forget how smaller items—like changing depreciation schedules or adjusting the assumptions behind share-based compensation—can wreak havoc on your forecasts:
• Depreciation and Amortization:
– Extending the useful life of machinery by even two years can reduce annual depreciation expense, artificially inflating EBITDA.
– The difference in IFRS or US GAAP approaches to revaluation or impairment can create lumps in your net income.
• Share-Based Compensation:
– IFRS and US GAAP guidelines both require expensing stock options or restricted shares over the vesting period, but fair value assumptions can differ.
– If the share-based comp expense is large, it can significantly shrink net income and CFO, especially if the expense is not matched by a cash outflow in the same period.
It’s one thing to build scenarios for your own analysis, but presenting them to a board or investors requires clarity:
• Use a Range:
– Present key line items as a range, from conservative to aggressive. Show major breakpoints.
– This helps stakeholders visualize boundaries of possible outcomes.
• Probability Weighting:
– Consider assigning probabilities: 40% chance baseline, 30% chance adverse, 30% chance favorable.
– Create a weighted average net income or EBITDA figure.
• Sensitivity Tables or “What-If” Analyses:
– Let stakeholders see how a 1% or 2% shift in revenue growth or COGS might skyrocket or slash net income.
– This approach reveals where the business is most vulnerable.
Forecasting is never a cookie-cutter exercise. Each assumption you make—whether about raw materials, currency environment, or intangible asset valuation—can ripple through both the income statement and balance sheet. Under IFRS or US GAAP, you also need to watch how lease and intangible asset accounting modifies your final pro forma statements and ratios. In short, scenario analysis is your best friend: it helps you visualize the range of possibilities and ensures that you (and your firm’s stakeholders) are prepared for surprises.
Glossary
• EBITDA: Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. A handy metric that approximates operating cash flow.
• Coverage Ratios (e.g., Interest Coverage): Measures how convincingly a firm can cover interest or other fixed payments.
• Segment Disclosures: Breaking out financials by geographic region, product line, or other dimenstions to provide more clarity to investors.
• Scenario Probability Weighting: Assigning likelihoods to each scenario, then calculating a weighted outcome.
References & Further Reading
• “International Financial Statement Analysis” by Thomas R. Robinson et al. (CFA Institute Investment Series)
• Chapter 2 of this Volume on IFRS vs. US GAAP—High-Level Differences
• Chapter 22 of this Volume on Segment Reporting and Related-Party Transactions
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.