Learn how to construct forward-looking income statements by examining historical data, forecasting key revenue drivers, and aligning assumptions with costs, depreciation, and share-based expenses.
Imagine you’re helping a friend forecast her new café’s earnings: you take a look at the past few months of receipts, try to guess how sales might grow as she adds pastries or special deals, and sort through all the costs that keep popping up—everything from that fancy espresso machine lease to employee wages. Well, that process is surprisingly similar to what we do when building pro forma income statements for large corporations—just on a more elaborate scale.
A pro forma income statement is basically your forward-looking view of revenues, expenses, and profits under a given set of assumptions or scenarios. It helps analysts, investors, and management get a sense of how changes in strategy, market conditions, or cost structures might affect future profitability. Let’s walk through some of the essential steps in building a solid pro forma income statement.
To forecast the future, we often start by studying the past. Typically, you’ll pull anywhere from three to five years of historical financials. This baseline reveals trends in:
• Revenue growth patterns (Does it grow steadily, or is it cyclical and bumpy?)
• Cost structure and margins (Are costs mostly fixed, or do they rise quickly with revenue?)
• Capital structure (Changes in financing, interest expenses, share repurchases, etc.)
If you see that over the last few years a firm’s revenue growth has been 5% annually, but the economy is expected to slow, you might adjust that 5% downward. Likewise, if the firm just acquired a big competitor, that might push revenue growth beyond 5%.
When pulling this historical data, watch for big one-time items: maybe there was a settlement or an unusually large inventory write-down that threw off a single year’s results. You’ll likely want to separate those so they don’t distort your forward projections.
Next, identify what actually drives revenues. Are sales volume and pricing the key factors? Or perhaps it’s the number of new store openings? In some industries, macroeconomic elements like GDP growth, interest rates, or commodity prices can weigh heavily on the top line.
Assume you’re forecasting for a firm that heavily relies on consumer spending. You might factor in some measure of consumer confidence index or unemployment rate. If external growth is expected to slow, your revenue forecast should probably reflect that.
Just be sure to keep your assumptions as consistent as possible across each revenue driver. For instance, if you assume strong economic expansion leading to higher volumes, see if higher prices make sense in that environment, too; typically, more robust demand can fuel a slightly higher price margin.
Costs usually move in some relation to revenue. If you’re projecting a surge in sales, you can’t ignore the fact that production or service costs will likely rise, too. So, walk through each cost line item to see whether it’s variable, fixed, or semi-variable:
• Variable costs (e.g., raw materials directly tied to production).
• Fixed costs (e.g., rent, property taxes, some salaries).
• Semi-variable costs (e.g., utilities that might partially scale with usage).
The resulting gross margin, operating margin, and eventually net margin estimates should tie consistently to the revenue side. Don’t forget to incorporate overhead or administrative functions that might also need to grow with the business (e.g., marketing or R&D).
It’s easy to overlook depreciation and amortization (D&A), but that’s a real cost of using assets over time. Depreciation applies to tangible assets—factory equipment, buildings, etc.—while amortization handles intangibles like patents or software licenses.
If the company just expanded its facilities last year, your forecast may show a jump in depreciation expense. Or if it has a wave of intangible assets about to be fully amortized, you might see a drop in future amortization expenses. Either way, you want your pro forma D&A to align with:
• The existing net book value of assets.
• Future CapEx plans (which create new assets to depreciate).
• The estimated useful lives of assets.
Share-based compensation—like stock options or restricted stock units (RSUs)—often shows up in footnotes. It can be significant enough to alter net income, especially for fast-growing technology or service firms. If the company’s planning a bunch of new share grants for key employees, factor that into expense forecasts.
You also want to consider the potential dilutive impact of these awards on earnings per share. Although that might be more relevant in an EPS forecast, the pro forma income statement should reflect the associated compensation expense.
It’s not uncommon for a company (or the entire accounting framework) to shift certain policies. For example, IFRS 15 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers) or ASC 606 can change the timing of revenue recognition. Similar changes could apply to leases, which might reclassify what used to be off-balance-sheet operating leases into on-balance-sheet finance leases (under IFRS 16 or ASC 842).
These adjustments can alter revenue timing or expense recognition, so your pro forma statements need to incorporate any known or expected changes in policy. Missing a shift in how revenue is recognized can make a big difference in your top-line forecast.
When you’re aiming for an estimate of sustainable earnings, you typically set aside unusual or non-recurring items, such as:
• Restructuring charges.
• Lawsuit settlements.
• Gains/losses from discontinued operations.
• Major asset write-downs (e.g., an impairment of goodwill).
Carve these out, or at least highlight them, so that your pro forma baseline focuses on ongoing operations. That said, if you expect another restructuring or repeated litigation in coming years, you might need to factor them in. It all depends on how truly “one-off” these items are.
If you’re preparing statements under IFRS, you might classify certain expenses or recognize certain revenues differently than if you’re using US GAAP. Even the definition of cost of sales might vary—which shifts how you project your margins. Also consider:
• IFRS often uses a principles-based approach, so you may have more judgment regarding revenue recognition or expense allocation.
• US GAAP can be more rules-based, leading to certain standardized treatments or thresholds.
Think carefully about the interplay with IFRS 15 vs. ASC 606 for revenue recognition; a small difference in how multi-element contracts are recognized can have a big effect on your pro forma statement.
All these forecasts are only as good as the assumptions behind them. It’s always wise to run a quick “gut check” by comparing your pro forma results to:
• Historical average or median margins for the company. Are you projecting a dramatic margin jump with no justification?
• Competitors’ margins. If you’re forecasting a profit margin that’s triple the industry average, that’s a red flag.
• Analysts’ or management guidance (when available). Don’t blindly accept it, but it can serve as a ballpark.
Look at key ratios like gross margin, operating margin (EBIT margin), and net margin to see if your final pro forma lines up with plausible business outcomes.
The process of building a pro forma income statement can be visualized as follows:
flowchart LR A["Gather <br/>Historical Data"] --> B["Identify <br/>Revenue Drivers"] B["Identify <br/>Revenue Drivers"] --> C["Project <br/>Costs"] C["Project <br/>Costs"] --> D["Include Depreciation <br/>& Amortization"] D["Include Depreciation <br/>& Amortization"] --> E["Reflect <br/>Share-Based Comp"] E["Reflect <br/>Share-Based Comp"] --> F["Adjust <br/>Non-Recurring Items"] F["Adjust <br/>Non-Recurring Items"] --> G["Apply IFRS <br/>vs. GAAP Distinctions"] G["Apply IFRS <br/>vs. GAAP Distinctions"] --> H["Validate <br/>Net Income & Margins"] H["Validate <br/>Net Income & Margins"] --> I["Finalize Pro Forma <br/>Income Statement"]
Let’s consider a hypothetical software company, InnovateX, that has the following recent track record:
• 5% annual revenue growth over the past three years.
• Ramp-up in share-based compensation as they hire top talent.
• A new subscription product that will likely boost revenue growth to 8% for the next two years, given strong market demand.
• Depreciation likely to rise after a planned data center upgrade.
When constructing InnovateX’s pro forma income statement:
Finally, we check net income trends—if we see a net margin that’s vastly out of line compared to historical levels (say it jumped from 12% to 20%, with no major rationale), we double-check assumptions and rerun the numbers as needed.
Building a pro forma income statement is as much art as it is science. You gather historical data, figure out the drivers, and make logical assumptions about how they’ll evolve. You layer in the cost structure, depreciation schedules, share-based compensation, plus any changes in accounting policy. And sure, throw in a dash of “gut check” before finalizing your forecast. A great pro forma statement offers a realistic, consistent, and justifiable view of future profitability—helping you or your clients make well-informed decisions.
• Capital Expenditure (CapEx): Funds used by a company to acquire or upgrade physical assets such as equipment or buildings.
• Depreciation and Amortization: Systematic allocation of the cost of tangible or intangible assets over their useful lives.
• Pro Forma: A forward-looking projection that includes certain assumptions or estimates.
• Sustainable Earnings: Profits that exclude transitory or one-time items and represent the ongoing operations of a business.
• Top-Line: Another name for revenue in the income statement.
• Transitory Events: Items that are not typical and are unlikely to recur frequently, like a big lawsuit settlement or a rare impairment.
• IFRS 15 / ASC 606: Standards for revenue recognition in international (IFRS) and US (GAAP) contexts, respectively.
• Share-Based Compensation: Awarding equity instruments (e.g., stock options, RSUs) to employees as part of their remuneration.
• Pinto, J.E., Henry, E., Robinson, T.R., & Stowe, J.D. (CFA Institute Investment Series). “Equity Asset Valuation.”
• IFRS 15 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers):
https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/
• ASC 606 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers):
https://asc.fasb.org
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.