Explore key strategies for preserving a firm’s market leadership by leveraging unique resources, managing innovation, and adapting to evolving competitive landscapes.
So, let’s say you’ve found a firm that outperforms its peers year after year. Maybe it’s been absolutely dominating, with superior products, a well-known brand, or technology that nobody else can match. The dream, of course, is to keep that magical edge forever—or at least long enough to generate substantial value for shareholders. That’s the heart of sustaining a competitive advantage.
In this section, we’re going to explore (perhaps in a slightly conversational way—hope you don’t mind!) what drives sustainable competitive advantage in corporate finance, how to preserve it, and why it matters so much for valuations. After all, if a firm’s competitive advantage evaporates, so can its excess returns.
A handy tool for pinpointing which resources and capabilities lead to sustained competitive advantage is the VRIO analysis (Barney, 1991). VRIO stands for:
• Valuable
• Rare
• Inimitable (and nonsubstitutable)
• Organized to capture value
An asset or capability that checks all four boxes tends to deliver more than just short-term profits; it can help the firm consistently earn returns above its cost of capital.
To break VRIO down a bit:
If the answer is “Yes” in all four categories, the resource or capability might form the bedrock of a firm’s long-term advantage.
• Tangible assets include machinery, manufacturing plants, physical stores, or robust logistics fleets. While they can be important, they are often easier to copy or acquire—thus less likely to be sustainable advantages in isolation.
• Intangible assets, such as patents, proprietary software, brand equity, and specialized human capital, can be much harder to replicate. Think about how Apple’s brand loyalty or IKEA’s low-cost supply chain design is nearly impossible to replicate exactly.
Many top-performing companies use patents and protected processes that yield exclusive benefits—say, a more efficient production method or a unique product feature. The intangible nature of these assets, coupled with legal protections, can create formidable barriers to imitation.
Consider a fictional pharmaceuticals company, MaplePharma, that invests heavily in R&D and holds exclusive rights for a life-saving medication. This proprietary technology can be a huge value driver, at least until the patent expires or competitors engineer around it.
Oh, and don’t forget about network effects (especially relevant for platform-based firms). Basically, the more users or participants a platform has, the more valuable it becomes for everyone on that platform. This dynamic can lead to explosive growth and effectively lock out latecomers. Social media giants, for instance, benefit from network effects: once a critical mass of users joins, new entrants face an uphill battle to lure that network away.
Below is a simple conceptual representation of how resources, capabilities, and VRIO link to long-term advantage:
flowchart LR
A["Identify <br/>Resources"] --> B["Apply VRIO <br/>Criteria"]
B --> C["Determine <br/>Sustainability"]
C --> D["Long-Term <br/>Competitive Advantage"]
Core competencies represent an organization’s collective expertise and critical abilities that distinguish it from competitors. Think of a core competency as the “secret sauce” that underpins exceptional performance.
Even the best “secret sauce” can lose its flavor over time if it’s not protected and updated. That’s why continuing R&D, offering training for staff, and being open to new insights from intrapreneurs all matter. Industries evolve quickly—just ask telecommunication companies that once bet big on landlines. Firms that recognize the need to continuously invest in their competencies are far more likely to keep that edge.
We should also beware of competency traps. A firm may get so comfortable with what it’s good at (say, making internal combustion engines) that it overlooks new technology (electric motors) until it’s almost too late.
Business is dynamic: consumer preferences shift, technology changes, and new competitors emerge from all over the place, sometimes unexpectedly. Strategic renewal is the process by which a firm identifies threats and opportunities in this fluid environment and adjusts its strategies to stay on top.
Stay curious. Keep your eyes open for:
Christensen (2013) calls it “disruptive innovation” when you get blindsided by smaller players or new technologies that can quickly take over if you’re not careful.
Allocating resources to new products or markets is crucial if a company wants to avoid being overly reliant on just one big advantage. For example, if a manufacturing firm is known for one star product but invests nothing into R&D for the next iteration, it may be outflanked. Shifting investment to new lines can be risky, but it’s often necessary to stay fresh.
Ever heard of intrapreneurship? That’s when employees inside a larger organization behave like startup founders—experimenting with new ideas, exploring offbeat solutions, and taking calculated risks. Firms that encourage this culture often adapt more quickly to changes, precisely because new thinking is welcome.
When a firm makes above-average returns, it naturally draws copycats (or, in finance lingo, “imitation threats”). The speed at which rivals can imitate an advantage depends on how replicable your resources and capabilities are.
Patents, trademarks, and licensing could help deter straightforward copying. Of course, legal protections vary by jurisdiction, so for firms competing globally, it pays to understand the complexities in each region.
Common entry barriers include:
Building or maintaining these barriers can preserve a firm’s competitive moat in the face of potential knockoffs.
Diversify not just by product lines but also by geography. That way, even if a competitor successfully replicates one product in one region, it still won’t topple your entire business. Think of it like a portfolio diversification concept in corporate strategy.
graph LR
X["Core Advantage"] --> Y["Imitation Threat?"]
Y --> |Low| A2["Maintain Legal <br/>Protections"]
Y --> |High| B2["Reinforce Barriers <br/>to Entry"]
A2 --> C2["Preserve or <br/>Enhance Advantage"]
B2 --> C2
It’s not enough for a firm to claim it has a unique advantage; it must actually generate excess returns above its cost of capital. A popular measure for this is Economic Value Added (EVA).
EVA = Net Operating Profit After Tax (NOPAT) – (WACC × Capital Invested)
Where:
If EVA is positive and consistently so, the firm is generating returns above its cost of capital. A negative EVA suggests the firm is destroying value, or its advantage (if any) isn’t robust enough.
High profitability is fantastic, but to keep that gravy train rolling, successful firms reinvest a portion of those profits into R&D, marketing, talent acquisition, or strategic expansions. They do this before a competitor disrupts them. It’s perhaps akin to the old saying: “Fix the roof while the sun is shining.”
You can also sustain competitive advantage by making sure key decision-makers have incentives aligned with the firm’s strategic vision. For instance, awarding stock options with vesting periods can motivate managers to think about enduring success rather than short-term results.
Once a firm has established a robust competitive position in its home market, global expansion often becomes a natural next step—especially if the advantage is replicable in other regions.
Some firms swoop into foreign markets with a standardized product that leverages economies of scale. Others carefully adapt (localize) their products to suit different tastes. A global fast-food chain might keep its core menu items but incorporate local cuisine variations. The right balance of standardization vs. localization can mean the difference between conquering new markets and failing spectacularly.
This can be challenging, especially if politics, regulations, or economic instability disrupt cross-border flows. Leading firms design supply chains that can mitigate disruptions. One real-life example: a multinational manufacturing company that sources raw materials from multiple regions so it’s never reliant on a single, risky source.
Going global often means you have to maintain consistent brand promises, yet handle cultural sensitivities. Labeling, product design, and messaging should feel relevant to locals but still reflect the brand identity that’s proven so successful domestically.
You’ll likely encounter exam vignettes that revolve around a firm in a certain industry—maybe it’s consumer goods or technology innovators. The scenario might disclose:
• Key drivers of advantage (e.g., brand leadership).
• Shifts in the industry that could threaten the advantage (technology changes, new entrants).
• Management’s potential solution (e.g., alliances, portfolio expansions, licensing deals).
You’ll want to be quick at spotting a company’s major advantage. Is it a specialized patent that’s valid for five more years? Is it a brand name recognized globally? Is it a hyper-efficient supply chain?
Watch for clues that the advantage is eroding: flattening revenue growth, new rivals offering lower prices, or product commoditization. Or maybe you see management shaving R&D budgets, indicating they might not keep up the innovation momentum.
Candidates might be asked: “What strategic action should management take to preserve or enhance its advantage?” The correct choice might be forging a joint venture, doubling down on R&D, obtaining new patents, or expanding into an untapped geography.
Let’s briefly illustrate how a tech-oriented manufacturing firm—call it OmniTech—might sustain advantage:
In a test scenario, a vignette might present the evolution of OmniTech’s strategy and ask you to identify how well they’re defending against new competition or maintaining brand loyalty.
• VRIO Framework: A tool that evaluates a resource’s competitive potential based on its value, rarity, inimitability, and the firm’s organization.
• Network Effects: When the value of a product or service increases with more users.
• Intrapreneurship: Nurturing entrepreneurial thinking within an existing organization.
• EVA (Economic Value Added): NOPAT minus a charge for the capital employed, using WACC.
• Localization: Modifying products or services to meet local tastes or regulatory requirements.
• Core Competency: A company’s defining strength or unique skill set that competitors find difficult to match.
• Barriers to Entry: Structural, financial, or strategic hurdles that inhibit new competitors from entering a market easily.
• Commodity Product: A standardized good with minimal differentiation, leading to competition mainly on price.
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management.
• Christensen, C. (2013). The Innovator’s Dilemma. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
• Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review.
• Always analyze a firm’s resources: intangible ones often matter most for sustainability.
• Evaluate how a firm remains agile: strategic renewal is key to survival in fast-changing markets.
• Stay alert to legal mechanisms, cost advantages, network effects, and brand equity that deter copycats.
• Analyze performance metrics, especially EVA, to confirm a real advantage (not a short-term fluke).
• Understand how to handle global expansion: standardize for cost savings but localize to resonate with different cultures.
• In exam vignettes, look for evidence that a once-powerful advantage might be slipping and consider the best strategic move to restore or protect it.
By weaving together these considerations—VRIO, competencies, imitation threats, alignment of incentives, and globalization—firms can (hopefully!) keep that elusive edge long into the future.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.