Discover how capital account transactions, including FDI and portfolio investments, influence currency valuation, risk-return analysis, and asset allocation in cross-border investment decisions.
Sometimes, we get so fixated on a country’s trade surplus or deficit that we forget the other big puzzle piece: the balance of payments (BOP) includes the current account, the capital account, and the financial account. The capital account—combined with the financial account under more modern classifications—tracks cross-border flows of funds, encompassing everything from foreign direct investments (FDI) in factories to short-term portfolio investments in government bonds.
Maybe you’ve seen news articles discussing “capital flight” from an emerging market when investors become nervous, or big infrastructure investments by multinationals in a developing country. These flows are recorded in a country’s capital or financial accounts. From a Level II perspective, it’s crucial to see how the balance of payments data can shape currency demand and supply, and how these flows interact with domestic economic variables like GDP growth, inflation, and interest rates.
Under the sixth edition of the IMF’s Balance of Payments Manual (BPM6), the capital account (in practice often referred to in tandem with the “financial account”) includes:
Although the terminologies have evolved (the “capital account” may be fairly small under BPM6, while “financial account” is significant), in much investment literature and many exam contexts, the umbrella term “capital account” often loosely covers all cross-border investment flows beyond pure trade in goods and services.
Capital flows affect a country’s exchange rate because when foreign capital enters, it needs to exchange into local currency. This increased demand can push the currency’s value up (all else equal). Conversely, outflows can depress the currency. Frequent or dramatic changes in flows can spur currency volatility—something central banks and policymakers monitor closely.
Capital inflows tend to be attracted by:
Meanwhile, dramatic outflows might be triggered by:
In the short run, capital flows can overwhelm purely trade-based drivers of exchange rates. Hence, analyzing BOP data from a capital-flow perspective is essential for forecasting potential currency moves.
Below is a simple visualization of the movement of capital flows:
flowchart LR A["Foreign Investors"] --> B["Capital Inflows <br/> (FDI, Portfolio)"] B["Capital Inflows <br/> (FDI, Portfolio)"] --> C["Domestic Banking System"] C["Domestic Banking System"] --> D["Projects, Equity Markets, Real Estate"] D["Projects, Equity Markets, Real Estate"] --> E["Returns / Repatriation"] E["Returns / Repatriation"] --> F["Foreign Investors"]
Now, let’s pause for a second: you’ve probably heard folks say, “Well, FDI is ‘sticky’ money, while portfolio flows are flighty.” That’s not just a catchphrase—it conveys the difference in both time horizon and risk posture.
• Portfolio investments (e.g., foreign purchases of a country’s equity or bond markets) can be volatile. Foreign investors might build positions and then liquidate quickly when conditions shift—think of a hedge fund that invests in emerging market bonds attracted by high yields, only to exit rapidly if the currency slides or if global credit conditions tighten.
• FDI, on the other hand, involves a controlling interest in a local business, real assets, or joint ventures. Because it’s often tied up in physical equipment or local operations, it’s harder to unwind swiftly. This relative “stickiness” can reduce short-term volatility but can also pose higher exit costs for the investor.
• Portfolio flows typically track short-term changes in interest rate differentials and risk appetite. A meaningful chunk of currency speculation or carry trades is captured here.
• FDI is more about long-term growth expectations—multinationals choose to build factories, distribution centers, or partnerships in countries where they see potential for robust returns. They’re not just chasing the next interest rate cycle; they’re embedding themselves into the host economy.
These distinctions matter for currency valuation and analyzing a country’s susceptibility to “sudden stops.” If a country relies mainly on short-term debt and portfolio investment to fund growth, it can face severe funding shortages if global sentiment turns negative.
A surge in capital inflows can spark exchange rate appreciation. Consider a developing economy with rising commodity prices and stable inflation—foreigners may pour in funds to snap up local bonds or equities. Higher demand for the local currency (to invest) pushes its value up. This can sound like a blessing, but you might also see negative side effects, such as reduced export competitiveness. A too-strong currency can make your exports expensive to foreign buyers.
Ever hear of “Dutch disease”? This occurs when a large influx of foreign capital or revenue (often from a boom in commodities like oil) appreciates the currency enough to undermine the domestic manufacturing or export sectors. The phrase references the 1960s Netherlands economy, which struggled competitively after discovering natural gas resources. Current examples often cite energy exporters that become over-reliant on a single resource export.
When conditions shift—maybe global interest rates rise or commodity prices fall—these inflows can quickly reverse. The local currency might abruptly depreciate, fueling inflation or forcing the central bank to respond with emergency measures. It’s no wonder governments watch these flows with caution. For instance, in exam vignettes, you might read about a hypothetical central bank intervening in the foreign exchange market to stabilize currency movements triggered by excessive capital flight.
Now, the million-dollar question is: how do governments manage or regulate capital flows?
Governments may limit or guide cross-border flows through capital controls. These can take the form of:
Such regulations can reduce the volatility of capital flows but may create market distortions. If, for example, a country severely restricts outflows, foreign investors might be reluctant to enter in the first place, as they worry about the difficulty of getting their principal back out.
Some nations place caps on how much foreign investors can own of local companies (especially in strategic sectors like telecommunications or defense). These constraints can alter the risk–return profile of foreign equity investments, as well as hamper the liquidity of these investments in the secondary market.
Regulations related to withholding taxes, capital gains taxes, or stamp duties on transactions also affect foreign investors’ net returns. Investors must incorporate these aspects into valuation models, which might reduce the attractiveness of certain destinations relative to others with lighter tax regimes.
Analyzing capital flows and the capital account is only the starting point. Then you must integrate those flows into a rigorous risk–return evaluation. In cross-border investing, it’s not enough to estimate an expected return in local terms—you also consider:
One approach for the exam—and real life—is to run scenario analyses:
• Scenario A: A favorable global environment (e.g., strong risk appetite, stable commodity prices) might boost capital inflows. The local currency appreciates, interest rates remain low, GDP grows.
• Scenario B: A tightening global monetary cycle (higher rates in advanced markets) can pull capital out of emerging economies. The local currency depreciates, bond yields spike, inflation risk rises.
• Scenario C: A domestic political crisis triggers foreign outflows, leading to a currency crisis—reserves might be used to defend the currency, or the central bank might impose emergency capital controls.
By examining the sensitivity of investment returns under these different states, an investor can gauge the cost of these risks and price them in.
At a portfolio management level, understanding capital flows helps you design a global allocation strategy. For instance, if your macro analysis suggests that certain emerging markets could receive strong inflows due to improving credit ratings or structural reforms, you might overweight equities or local-currency bonds there. Or if you suspect a sudden rate hike in the U.S. will pressure emerging market flows, you might hedge currency exposure or reduce positions preemptively.
Central banks in developed markets (e.g., the Federal Reserve, ECB, or Bank of Japan) have frequently used unconventional monetary policies (think quantitative easing). Such policies can create excess global liquidity that seeks higher yields in emerging and frontier markets. When these polices reverse, so do some of the flows. This dynamic underscores why portfolio managers need to stay alert to central bank signals and anticipate how global liquidity shifts might distort capital flows.
Modern portfolio theory has led to sophisticated global asset allocation models that incorporate correlations among assets in multiple countries. Flows of capital can change these correlations, especially during periods of stress when all correlations might spike toward 1.0—a phenomenon many learned painfully during past financial crises. Being mindful of potential abrupt correlation shifts is a key aspect of managing cross-border holdings.
Capital Account
Part of a country’s balance of payments that records net changes in ownership of national assets (under some definitions, mostly intangible assets, debt forgiveness, etc.). Often used colloquially in conjunction with what is formally the “financial account,” which includes FDI, portfolio investment, and other investments.
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
Long-term investment where the investor obtains a lasting interest and a degree of control in a foreign enterprise (e.g., building a factory, acquiring majority stakes in local companies).
Portfolio Investment
Investment in securities—equities, bonds, and sometimes derivatives—where the investor does not seek control. These flows can be short-term and volatile.
Balance of Payments (BOP)
Records transactions between one country and the rest of the world, dividing them primarily into the current account (goods and services trade, net income, and current transfers) and the capital/financial accounts (recording capital transfers and financial flows).
Capital Controls
Regulations or restrictions by governments to manage the flow of foreign capital into or out of domestic capital markets. These can include taxes, quotas, and strict ownership requirements.
Dutch Disease
A situation where large foreign inflows or windfalls—often from resource exports—appreciate a country’s currency, undermining other export sectors and skewing the economy’s structure.
IMF Balance of Payments Manual (Sixth Edition):
https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/bop/2007/pdf/bpm6.pdf
“Global Capital Flows and the Role of Central Banks,” BIS Working Papers:
https://www.bis.org/publ/
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.