Explore a step-by-step guide to creating, deploying, and refining a daily equity returns forecast model with a big data pipeline, from data collection to monitoring performance.
Sometimes it feels like everyone is tossing around the phrase “big data,” but we’re not always sure how it works in practice—especially when it comes to applying it in finance. This vignette aims to demystify things a bit (or at least give you a step-by-step blueprint) by walking through a real-ish scenario: building a daily equity returns forecast model for a global multi-asset portfolio. Our end goal? Predict the direction (Buy or Sell) of tomorrow’s equity returns for each stock in the portfolio.
The big idea here is to combine a bunch of data sources: historical price data, fundamentals, macro indicators, and even that intangible “sentiment” from corporate filings or news. The final product should be a daily “Buy” or “Sell” signal spit out by a model that’s robust enough to handle the unpredictability of markets. We’ll talk data cleaning, feature engineering, model selection, deployment, and monitoring—basically the entire pipeline.
I remember the first time I tried to do a big data project for daily forecasts—my biggest rookie mistake was not scoping it out well. My team got overwhelmed with data we didn’t need, and we wasted weeks sorting out what was relevant. So, lesson one: define objectives and decide how far you really want to go.
• Objective: Predict the next day’s return direction—basically “Buy” if we expect positive returns, or “Sell” if we expect negative or negligible returns.
• Key Deliverables: A daily service that can ingest fresh data, run the model, and produce signals by market open.
Setting up a daily pipeline also means we need robust scheduling. We’ll collect data from the prior day’s close, process, and have the forecast ready soon after.
When it comes to data in finance, we’re typically pulling from multiple vendors or official reports—Bloomberg or Refinitiv for price data, EDGAR for fundamentals, etc. If you’re anything like me, you’ll realize quickly that different sources have different formats and cleanliness levels.
• Historical Price Data: End-of-day close prices, maybe with volume, from a data vendor. Keep an eye out for corporate actions like splits or dividends, which can throw off your time series.
• Fundamental Data: Quarterly (or sometimes even monthly) earnings, revenue, and other items from EDGAR. Patching these into daily data can be tricky, so watch the date alignment carefully.
• Market Sentiment: Automatic scraping of news or 10-K filings can add a layer of complexity. You’ll need an NLP (Natural Language Processing) library to assign sentiment scores.
If you notice some newly listed stocks that don’t have a full price history, fill in those blanks or maybe trash those tickers altogether if data is too sparse. Don’t forget: inconsistent data can be deadly, especially if your model is sensitive to short-term patterns.
So you’ve got your data. Great. Now what? Even after you collect it, you’ll probably face:
• Missing or Partial Dates: Perhaps some stocks didn’t trade on a given day, or your data vendor messed up. You might forward-fill data for short absences or use bridging approaches—like substituting the sector average return if a stock had zero data.
• Corporate Actions: If there was a stock split, you might want to adjust historical prices to keep everything consistent.
• Outliers: A single, suspicious price spike isn’t always an error—maybe the CEO got indicted that day—but it’s something you want to think carefully about.
Also, normalizing your signals can be huge. Sentiment scores might be around 0.0 to 1.0, while prices might be in the hundreds. You want everything on a consistent scale so the model doesn’t overweight one type of feature just because it has bigger numerical values.
Alright, so we have squeaky-clean data (fingers crossed). Now it’s time to build features. This is where your creativity matters. On one project, my friend found that adding a “day of the week” feature actually improved returns forecasting, presumably capturing some cyclical patterns.
Below are some typical features:
• Rolling Averages & Momentum: 5-day or 20-day moving averages, moving standard deviation (volatility), that kind of thing.
• Sector-Level Sentiment: If the S&P 500 Oil & Gas sector has negative sentiment, that might affect our particular energy stock.
• Macroeconomic Shocks: On days when the Fed surprises markets with a sudden rate hike, that edge might be crucial. Encode it with a simple dummy variable or a numeric measure of surprise.
If we assume each equity’s direction depends on both fundamental and market-driven signals, we can do a combined approach. The key is to keep an eye on the trading frequency: daily is tight, so we want features that reflect short-term movements but also incorporate some fundamental angles.
Now for the fun part—picking a model. Everyone loves neural nets, but random forest classifiers are often a good sweet spot between interpretability and performance. They handle non-linearities and noisy data gracefully.
We want to train on historical data from, say, 2018 to 2022, then test on 2023 so far. But we can’t just do a typical random train/test split. With time series, you have to respect chronology. That’s why walk-forward cross-validation is so popular:
This approach simulates real-time usage—at least more so than just ignoring time ordering. Then measure metrics like accuracy, precision, recall for Buy signals, and maybe even track an out-of-sample PnL if you hypothetically traded on those signals.
Random forests have hyperparameters such as the number of trees, maximum depth, or the minimum samples needed to split a node. You can do a random or grid search. In practice, random search is often less time-consuming, especially if you have a large parameter space.
Once you’ve got your best model, it’s time to deploy. A straightforward approach is to host your model in the cloud (AWS, Azure, or GCP). You can schedule a daily job that:
• Pulls the new data after market close.
• Performs all your wrangling, normalization, and feature generation.
• Applies the model to produce signals for the next day’s open.
• Outputs a CSV or a database entry that your trading system can read.
You’re not done yet. Honestly, monitoring might be the hardest part. Markets change. The model that worked last month might tank if a new macro environment or a black swan event arises. So:
• Track model performance daily: accuracy, precision, recall, confusion matrix, and PnL if you’re actually trading.
• Monthly Retraining: Keep your model aware of recent data. A common approach is a rolling window—maybe only train on the last three years so the model doesn’t overweight ancient data.
• Threshold Adjustments: If your model is spitting out too many “Buy” signals, it might be that you need to tweak the classification threshold based on your risk tolerance.
Below is a simple flowchart showing how data moves through the pipeline:
flowchart LR A["Data Sources <br/>Historical Prices <br/>Fundamentals <br/>News/Filings"] --> B["Data Cleaning <br/>Handles Missing Info <br/>Adjust for Splits"] B --> C["Feature Engineering <br/>Momentum, Sentiment <br/>Macro Dummies"] C --> D["Random Forest Training <br/>Walk-Forward CV <br/>Hyperparameter Tuning"] D --> E["Deployment & Scheduling <br/>Daily Signals"] E --> F["Monitoring & Retraining <br/>Monthly Updates <br/>PnL & Performance Metrics"]
• Walk-Forward Cross-Validation: A strategy for training and testing time-series models where you carefully maintain temporal ordering.
• Fundamental Data: Core financial data (earnings, revenue, etc.) from official filings.
• Sentiment Analysis: Combining text analytics tools and finance to score how “positive” or “negative” a piece of text might be.
• Corporate Actions: Stock splits, dividends, mergers, or acquisitions that alter share counts or share prices in your historical data.
• CFA Institute: Case studies on quantitative investment strategies and big data usage.
• Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). “Data Science for Business.” O’Reilly Media.
• Khan, M., & Elder, J. (2014). “A Real-World Walk-Forward Analysis Example,” Journal of Computational Finance.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.