A comprehensive guide to real estate investments, valuation methods, and risk factors for CFA Level II candidates, covering everything from direct ownership and REITs to appraisal-based indexing and due diligence. Ideal for those seeking an in-depth understanding of real estate fundamentals and advanced analytical techniques.
Real estate can be an intriguing and tangible part of an investment portfolio. For some folks, there’s nothing like physically touching the bricks and mortar that (hopefully) works to grow their net worth over time. I remember the first time I walked into a 50-year-old commercial building I was looking to invest in—part of me was super excited by the potential returns, and another part was unnerved by the creaky floors and suspect plumbing. That’s real estate for you: a mix of real-world assets and financial opportunities, all wrapped up in location-driven complexities.
In this chapter, we’ll explore different types of real estate investments (both direct and indirect), look at how properties are valued, check out how REITs are analyzed, and highlight key risk factors. Wherever you see big concepts, we’ll try to break them down into digestible bites so that you can build a solid foundation for the CFA Level II exam—and also for your own investing insight.
Real estate is often divided into direct ownership (physically owning the property) and indirect ownership (investing in vehicles that own properties). Both approaches can serve as important diversifiers in a broader portfolio. Let’s dig in:
• Residential: Single-family homes, duplexes, condos—these are often the first real estate investments people consider. In residential real estate, investors typically earn returns mainly from rental income and property appreciation over time.
• Commercial: Office buildings, retail centers, shopping malls, hotels—these tend to produce higher rental incomes but often require more complex management and incur bigger capital outlays.
• Industrial: Warehouses, manufacturing plants, and distribution centers. Today, e-commerce has boosted demand for logistics and distribution facilities, making industrial real estate a key growth segment.
• Agricultural: Farmland producing crops or livestock. Values in this category are often influenced by commodity prices, farming technology, and consumer preferences for particular food products.
• Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): A popular way to hold a stake in a diversified pool of properties without having to deal with plumbing leaks at 2 a.m. REITs trade like stocks on an exchange, offering liquidity and requiring that they distribute a significant portion of their income.
• Real Estate Operating Companies (REOCs): Publicly listed companies that own and actively manage real estate. Unlike REITs, they may reinvest more heavily in growth opportunities rather than distributing the majority of cash flows.
• Commingled Real Estate Funds (CREFs): Pooled funds typically managed by professional investment firms. They provide diversified exposure to multiple properties or real estate–related assets.
• Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS): Debt instruments backed by pools of mortgages. Although investors don’t own the properties outright, they hold claims on the mortgage cash flows.
Below is a quick reference comparing direct vs. indirect ownership:
Direct Ownership | Indirect Ownership | |
---|---|---|
Capital Outlay | Potentially high (down payments, financing, improvement) | Often lower entry costs (buying REIT shares, investing in funds, or buying MBS) |
Liquidity | Generally illiquid | Typically more liquid (e.g., publicly traded REITs, MBS) |
Management Responsibility | Landlord duties (maintenance, tenant relations, etc.) | Outsourced to professional managers (REIT mgmt., fund mgmt., etc.) |
Risk/Return Characteristics | Property-specific (location, tenant risk, etc.) | Diversified across multiple properties or mortgages |
Regulatory & Tax Framework | Subject to property taxes, local laws, capital gains | REITs, REOCs, and MBS subject to specific regulations (e.g., distribution requirements) |
Valuing real estate usually involves three major approaches: (1) Income Approach, (2) Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method, and (3) Sales Comparison (Market) Approach. Let’s illustrate these in a Mermaid diagram to help visualize:
flowchart LR A["Valuation Approaches"] --> B["Income Approach <br/> (Cap Rate Method)"] A --> C["Discounted <br/> Cash Flow (DCF)"] A --> D["Sales <br/> Comparison"]
The income approach is grounded in the idea that the value of a property can be inferred from the income it generates. In practice, we usually:
Example: If a small office building produces an annual NOI of $100,000 and the local market cap rate is 8%, the property’s estimated value is $100,000 ÷ 0.08 = $1,250,000.
Sometimes called the “long formula,” DCF feels like a more rigorous extension of the income approach. It projects future cash flows (including a terminal or resale value) over multiple years, then discounts them back to the present at a required rate of return.
Here, we look at comparable properties that have sold recently. We make adjustments for differences in size, location, amenities, condition, and other property-specific factors. This approach can be especially handy for residential real estate, where many comparable transactions exist.
For instance, if the average price per square foot in a certain neighborhood is $200, but your property has a newer roof and extra garage space, you might justify a higher per-square-foot valuation. Conversely, if your property is older or less attractively located, you might adjust downwards.
If you’re tracking real estate performance, you’ll notice two broad ways to measure property values in the market:
• Appraisal-Based Indices: These rely on periodic property appraisals for valuation, which means they may lag actual market fluctuations. As a result, reported returns can appear “smooth” or less volatile because appraisals don’t happen every day.
• Transaction-Based Indices: These use actual sales data, offering more real-time reflections of market sentiment. However, because real estate transactions can be infrequent or lumpy, you may see more pronounced swings (volatility) in these indices.
From an investment perspective, be aware that appraisal-based indices might understate risk (volatility). That could be problematic if you’re trying to assess correlation with other asset classes. For exam day, remember that “smoothing” is code for underreporting actual risk.
REITs, being publicly traded, can be analyzed using both equity-style measures and real estate–specific yardsticks. Let’s focus on two commonly cited metrics:
Funds from Operations (FFO)
FFO = Net Income + Depreciation & Amortization – Gains on Property Sales
Why add back depreciation? Because real estate often appreciates over time (at least in an inflationary environment), so standard GAAP depreciation may understate a property’s actual economic value.
Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO)
AFFO = FFO – Non-Cash Rent Adjustments – Ongoing Capital Expenditures
AFFO often serves as a closer proxy for the REIT’s true free cash flow. It accounts for routine capital spending—like that new air-conditioning unit the building absolutely needs every decade or so—and any non-cash items in the reported rent.
Public market investors in REITs also rely on:
• P/FFO (Price to Funds from Operations): Instead of the usual P/E ratio.
• P/AFFO (Price to Adjusted Funds from Operations)
Both Canada and the U.S. have rules guiding how REITs must be structured, the types of assets they hold, and distribution requirements.
• U.S. REITs:
– Must comply with Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rules, including core asset and income tests.
– Must distribute at least 90% of taxable income (as dividends).
– Are tax-advantaged at the corporate level but distributions are often taxed at individual ordinary income rates (unless in a tax-advantaged account).
• Canadian REITs:
– Similar distribution requirements, typically required to distribute most of their taxable income.
– Taxation on distributions may differ by province, and certain REITs might adopt unique structures to accommodate local regulations or tax law.
– Must also satisfy certain requirements around property holding and management to maintain REIT status.
Real estate is a complex asset class. Before investing, it’s crucial to investigate—and keep investigating—these biggies:
• Location: This old real estate adage—location, location, location—still holds. Economic growth, local development, and zoning changes can make or break a property’s value.
• Tenant Mix: A commercial property relying heavily on one major tenant (who might decide to leave) poses concentration risk. A more diversified tenant roster can spread the risk.
• Interest Rates: Real estate is often premium-financed. Rising interest rates increase mortgage costs, which can reduce cash flows and property values. Also, higher interest rates might draw capital away from real estate into bonds or other instruments.
• Management Expertise: Good management can unlock property value through renovations, improved leases, or better marketing. Poor management lets a property degrade, leading to higher vacancy rates.
• Regulatory and Tax Considerations: Property taxes, capital gains taxes, environmental regulations—these can all significantly affect net returns. In some regions, strict rent control laws also cap potential rental income.
• Market Liquidity: Real estate markets can become illiquid during times of economic stress. Properties might stay unsold for a prolonged period or sell at distressed prices.
• Capitalization Rate (Cap Rate): A ratio used to estimate an investment’s return, calculated as NOI / Property Value.
• Commingled Real Estate Fund (CREF): A pooled fund investing in various properties or real estate–related assets, commonly managed by a firm or financial institution.
• Funds from Operations (FFO): A measure of a REIT’s performance calculated as Net Income plus Depreciation and Amortization minus Gains on Property Sales. Useful for analyzing the ongoing profitability of a REIT.
• Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO): FFO adjusted for recurring capital expenditures and other non-cash items; seen as a more accurate proxy for a REIT’s free cash flow.
• Appraisal Smoothing: The tendency for real estate returns to look less volatile because valuations are derived from infrequent property appraisals.
• Real Estate Operating Company (REOC): A public company that owns or operates real estate but does not elect REIT status. REOCs are not subject to the same distribution requirements.
• NAV (Net Asset Value): For a REIT, the fair market value of its underlying properties minus liabilities, often used as a benchmark for share price valuations.
• NOI (Net Operating Income): Rental income minus all property-level operating expenses, not including interest, taxes, depreciation, or amortization.
• Double-check the distinction between appraisal-based and transaction-based indices. They’ll love to test you on the “smoothing” phenomenon.
• For REIT valuation, clearly remember how FFO and AFFO are calculated—and why they exist as better metrics than plain net income.
• Understand the difference between direct capitalization and DCF. You may get a vignette that leads you to estimate the property’s value using different methods and reconcile them.
• Master the “location and tenant mix” risk factor. You might see a question that asks: “Which property is better?” Always consider location, economic conditions, tenant diversification, and interest rate risk.
• Keep an eye on the Canadian vs. U.S. REIT structures. They often like to throw in a question or two about distribution requirements or tax differences in your exam.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.