Learn how to value bonds with embedded call, put, and conversion features using binomial lattice models, option-adjusted spreads, and key measures like one-sided durations and effective convexities.
Sometimes you encounter something in finance that just makes you pause and go, “Wait, did I see that right?” That was me when I first stumbled upon callable bonds years ago. I remember thinking: Why would an issuer ever want to call back a perfectly good bond? But you know what, it makes total sense once you factor in changing interest rates and the flexibility these embedded options offer. So let’s step right in and explore the world of bonds with embedded options, a topic that can feel intimidating but—believe it or not—turns out to be quite fascinating.
Before we dive into the nitty-gritty of valuation, we need to understand the basic structures of embedded options and how they relate to bonds.
Callable Bonds
A callable bond gives the issuer the right (but not the obligation) to redeem the bond before it matures, typically after a certain lockout period. Issuers most often exercise this call feature when market interest rates have gone down, allowing them to refinance at a lower cost—kind of like paying off a high-interest mortgage early.
Putable Bonds
Putable bonds do the opposite, granting the investor (that could be you) the right to “put” the bond back to the issuer—forcing the issuer to buy it back at a set price. Investors typically exercise this put option when interest rates climb, so they can exit the bond and reinvest at higher yields.
Convertible Bonds
Convertible bonds are interesting hybrids. They allow the bondholder to convert the bond into a specified number of shares of the issuing company’s stock. If the stock price rises significantly, the bondholder can switch from being a lender earning coupon payments to being a shareholder enjoying the upside potential of equity.
To really wrap your head around an embedded option, imagine dissecting the bond into two parts: a plain-vanilla “straight” bond and an option component.
Because that call option belongs to the issuer, it reduces the value of the bond for investors—nobody pays you full price if they can “call” you away.
This time, the investor owns the put option outright. That extra advantage naturally adds to the bond’s value.
The conversion feature is beneficial for you, the bondholder, so it adds to the total price.
One of the most frequently used methods to value these types of bonds is the binomial (or lattice) model. You know how it is: You build an interest rate tree with possible up and down movements, and then at each node you figure out what the bond is worth, factoring in whether the option would be exercised.
If you’re thinking, “Hmm, that sounds complicated,” you’re not alone. It’s a bit like traveling through a choose-your-own-adventure book: at each step (or node), rates can go up or down, and we see what the bond payoff is. But, I promise, once you see the structure visually, it’s not as bad.
Here’s a simple (very simplified!) version of a two-period binomial tree to illustrate the concept:
graph LR A["Time 0<br/>Interest Rate=r0"] B["Time 1 Up<br/>Interest Rate=r0+Δr"] C["Time 1 Down<br/>Interest Rate=r0-Δr"] D["Time 2 Up-Up<br/>Interest Rate=r0+2Δr"] E["Time 2 Up-Down<br/>Interest Rate=r0"] F["Time 2 Down-Up<br/>Interest Rate=r0"] G["Time 2 Down-Down<br/>Interest Rate=r0-2Δr"] A --> B A --> C B --> D B --> E C --> F C --> G
At each node, you’d simulate the bond’s possible values. For a callable bond, you check if the issuer would call it (if it’s cheaper to repurchase the bond than to continue paying coupons). For a putable bond, you see if the investor would put it (if it’s better for the investor to get the put price right now). Those decisions flow backward through the tree in a process called backward induction, allowing you to arrive at a “fair” price today.
Ever wonder why volatility matters so much? Well, if volatility (σ) is high, the value of the embedded option is higher. That means:
Additionally, callable bonds often exhibit negative convexity when yields are low. That basically means that as interest rates drop, the price of the bond won’t rise as much as a similar straight bond—because the increased likelihood of a call coming from the issuer caps the bond’s upside price appreciation.
Another important concept with these embedded-option bonds is the Option-Adjusted Spread (OAS). If you see a bond trading at a spread over the benchmark curve, that nominal spread might be a little skewed because of the embedded option. OAS is basically the spread that makes the bond’s model price match its market price once you “remove” the cost of that embedded option. It’s the spread over the risk-free curve that you’d earn if the bond behaved like a vanilla instrument.
In practice, you’ll see:
It can be a bit counterintuitive, but once you run the numbers, it usually clicks.
Let’s be real: in a normal bond, we typically calculate a single measure for duration, maybe get a sense of convexity, and call it a day. But once you have embedded options, the bond’s price path can behave very differently when rates go up versus when rates go down. That’s why we talk about one-sided durations:
Because the call option tends to be exercised when rates drop significantly (or it becomes more in-the-money when yields decline), the bond’s price reaction to downward moves in rates differs from that of a normal bond. Meanwhile, for a putable bond, the presence of a put option can significantly alter the bond’s response to upward movements in rates.
Effective convexity refines the second derivative of the price-yield relationship for these bonds, helping measure how curvature in the price-yield profile changes once optionality is considered. This is super important if you’re dealing with large swings in rates or if you’re deploying advanced portfolio strategies.
Convertible bonds are a bit like a Swiss Army knife: part debt, part equity, and occasionally a conversation starter. The gist of it:
If the stock jumps in value, that call option portion of the convertible bond can become very valuable. If the stock remains lackluster, you’re still (hopefully) getting your coupon payments like a regular bond. Corporate actions—like dividends and share buybacks—can nudge the conversion feature’s value too.
From a valuation standpoint, a lattice model can handle convertible bonds by adding another branch or dimension for the changing stock price. You track bond value at each node, factor in conversion if it’s optimal, and then fold all that back to present value. It can feel like juggling, but with practice, it gets easier.
While the fundamental pricing concepts hold true everywhere, local market conventions can influence both the structure and popularity of embedded options. In the U.S., you’ll see a healthy amount of municipal bonds with call features. In Canada, certain corporate bond issues might come with sinking-fund provisions or special redemption rights. Tax treatments also vary: if you exercise a call (or forced to have your bond called away), you might have certain capital gains or income tax implications, depending on your local regulations.
In many emerging or smaller markets, embedded options may be rarer or have unique conditions. Always be sure to check the fine print in the bond indenture.
Let’s walk through a simplified numeric example to highlight how binomial tree valuation might work. Suppose we have a 2-year callable bond with a coupon rate of 5%, annual payments, and face value of $100. The issuer can call it at par ($100) at the end of Year 1. We’ll do a two-step tree:
Imagine we label these up (U) and down (D) states. If at Time 1 the rate moves down to 4%, the issuer will consider calling the bond if it’s cheaper to refinance. For instance, let’s say the price of the bond if it were not called is $104. If the issuer can call at $100, they’ll do that. This might cap the bond’s price at $100 in that down-rate scenario.
You then compute expected payoffs in each node at Time 2. In the up-rate scenario (6%), higher yields generally reduce the bond’s price. We push these payoffs back to Time 1, then back again to Time 0 using the appropriate discount factors. The final result is a “fair” theoretical price that incorporates the potential call.
This example is obviously abbreviated, but it shows how you’d incorporate the call decision at each relevant node in the interest rate tree. For a putable bond, you’d do the same but from the investor’s perspective—would the investor exercise the put?
• Pay close attention to interest rate volatility assumptions. If you get the volatility input wrong, you can put your entire valuation off.
• Watch out for changes in issuer credit quality. If the issuer’s credit deteriorates, it can affect the decision to call or not to call, as well as yield-level assumptions.
• For convertible bonds, keep an eye on corporate actions (share buybacks, stock splits, dividend changes). These can shift conversion ratios or the effective value of conversion.
• Don’t ignore transaction costs: If you’re on a large trading floor, factoring in actual bid-ask spreads can matter when determining real-world prices.
Bonds with embedded options can feel a little tricky at first, but once you get the hang of how the options factor into valuation, you’ll see they’re not so mystical after all. Callable bonds favor the issuer in a falling-rate environment. Putable bonds give you a bit of a safety net if yields spike. Convertible bonds let you sneak a foot in the door of a stock’s upside potential. Modeling these bonds often boils down to building a decent interest rate tree, analyzing optional exercise decisions carefully, and adjusting for volatility. And if you can compute it, you can measure it—through OAS, one-sided durations, and effective convexities.
I think the bottom-line is that these bonds, for better or worse, let you see how real-life financial decisions (like calling or putting a bond) impact prices in dynamic markets. And that’s what makes them so genuinely interesting.
• Practice building binomial trees. Don’t just read about them—work through at least one or two examples.
• Remember the sign on the option value: a call reduces bond value to the investor, a put increases bond value.
• Understand how negative convexity can pop up in callable bonds.
• Keep an eye on the difference between nominal spread and OAS. The exam loves to test your comprehension of how option cost distorts observed spreads.
• For convertible bonds, be sure you know how changes in the underlying stock price and corporate actions might affect the conversion value.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.