Learn how curvature captures changes in the yield curve’s mid-maturities relative to short and long ends, and explore how butterfly strategies exploit these movements to enhance fixed-income returns or hedge exposure.
Curvature, in the context of the yield curve, is all about how the “middle” maturities behave compared to the short (front) end and the long (back) end. Whenever we see a yield curve chart, many folks focus on whether it’s sloping upward or downward, but there’s another dimension to watch: how “humped” or “bowed” the yield curve is around its middle maturities.
Let’s imagine you have a three-legged stool, with legs of different lengths. The short and long legs might be stable, but if the middle leg grows or shrinks, the entire stool’s shape changes. That’s basically what curvature is: how the mid-maturity yields deviate relative to the shorter- and longer-maturity yields.
• When curvature increases, the mid-section yield might rise more (or drop less) than the yields on shorter and longer maturities. This creates that “hump.”
• When curvature decreases, the mid-section flattening reduces any hump, so the curve looks more “bent” around the ends.
In market parlance, a shift in curvature means the center of the yield curve has moved in a different direction or at a different speed than the ends. If you’re analyzing potential trades, these changes can offer a sweet spot for generating returns—assuming you anticipate the correct changes, of course.
A butterfly strategy in fixed income aims to profit from changes in the yield curve’s shape, typically focusing on that middle portion. It gets its name from the position structure: you hold (or short) short-maturity bonds, intermediate-maturity bonds, and long-maturity bonds in a particular ratio.
In the simplest form:
• A “long butterfly” buys the short- and long-maturity bonds and simultaneously sells (shorts) the intermediate-maturity bond. Traders employ a long butterfly when they think the yield curve’s middle is going to “pop up” relative to the wings—i.e., they expect increased curvature or a more pronounced hump.
• A “short butterfly” does the reverse, shorting the short- and long-end bonds while going long the intermediate portion. You’d choose a short butterfly if you anticipate that the yield curve’s mid-section will come down relative to the wings, reducing curvature.
Think of the butterfly as a seesaw with a big weight in the middle. If you’re “long” the wings (short and long bonds) relative to the middle, you profit if the middle yield rises more, making the seesaw tilt. If you’re “short” the wings, you profit if that middle yield moves down relative to the ends.
Sure, it sounds a bit abstract. But I remember the first time I came across a butterfly trade: a seasoned trader explained it to me like balancing two bowling balls (short and long maturities) on either end of a plank and a smaller ball rolling around in the center (the intermediate maturity). If the smaller ball ends up higher than expected, you make money if you were “long” the short and long ends. If that center ball dips, you gain if you were “short” the short and long ends.
In practice, the butterfly strategy can be set up using either cash bonds or interest rate futures (or a combination). The ratio of short-to-long positions depends on the durations and market values of the specific bonds you choose. A typical approach is matching durations so that the net overall portfolio has minimal exposure to a uniform, parallel shift in rates, thus isolating your bet on curvature changes.
Duration (D):
– Duration measures the bond’s price sensitivity to interest rate changes. If you have equal durations on your long and short positions, a uniform yield curve shift affects them similarly, so net effect is small.
– Butterfly trades refine this concept by balancing overall durations but leaving you exposed to changes in the shape of the curve.
Convexity (C):
– Convexity measures the rate at which duration changes as yields change. For butterfly trades, convexity plays a role because the intermediate bond and the short/long bonds might have different convexities.
– A “long butterfly” often has positive convexity if you picked the right combination of short and long bonds because longer maturity bonds tend to have higher convexity. That means if yields move unexpectedly, you might still see some cushion or gain from that curvature bet.
One popular measure for curvature is:
(1) Curvature Metric = 2 × Yield(Intermediate Maturity) – [Yield(Short Maturity) + Yield(Long Maturity)]
If this number is positive and rising over time, the curve is developing more of a hump around the intermediate maturity. If it’s negative or declining, the curve is flattening around the middle. Let’s do a quick hypothetical:
• Short Maturity Yield: 2.0%
• Intermediate Maturity Yield: 3.5%
• Long Maturity Yield: 4.0%
Curvature Metric = 2 × 3.5% – (2.0% + 4.0%)
= 7.0% – 6.0%
= +1.0%
We get 1.0%, which indicates a modest “hump.” If we expected that 3.5% mid-yield to rise further, maybe to 3.7% or 3.8%, we might go for a long butterfly.
Below is a short Python snippet that calculates this metric. It’s obviously simplified, but helpful if you want to whip up quick checks on yield curve shape changes in real markets:
1short_yield = 2.0
2intermediate_yield = 3.5
3long_yield = 4.0
4
5curvature = 2 * intermediate_yield - (short_yield + long_yield)
6print(f"Curvature Metric: {curvature:.2f}%")
Below is a simple Mermaid diagram conceptualizing a “long butterfly” arrangement, where we hold short and long maturities (positive positions) but short the intermediate maturity bond:
graph LR A["+ Bond <br/>(Short Maturity)"] --> B["- Bond <br/>(Intermediate Maturity)"] B["- Bond <br/>(Intermediate Maturity)"] --> C["+ Bond <br/>(Long Maturity)"]
The “+” sign means a long position, while the “–” sign indicates a short position. If intermediate yields rise relative to the short and long yields, the negative position in the intermediate maturity will profit, and the long positions at the short and long maturities could also gain if their yields decline or rise at a slower pace. In short, you’re counting on that middle to outpace the wings in yield.
• Speculative Opportunity: Butterfly trades offer a direct way to profit from “shape” changes without taking a big bet on overall rate levels. If your analysis of forward curves or macro data suggests that mid-term yields will deviate from the short and long, a butterfly trade might be your ticket.
• Hedging: Sometimes an investor holds a chunk of intermediate bonds but wants to hedge any humping or flattening around the curve. A short butterfly can offset that risk.
• Yield Enhancement: Larger asset managers might use a butterfly for relative-value trades: if they spot a mispricing where the middle yields look too high or too low compared to short and long ends, they might enter the position until the price normalizes.
But, well, we can’t just talk pros without acknowledging the cons. As with any yield curve strategy, there are plenty of pitfalls:
• Market Liquidity: If the intermediate maturity you want to short is illiquid, you might face wide bid-ask spreads or trouble exiting the trade.
• Transaction Costs: You have three positions, so everything from commissions to spread costs are multiplied. Butterfly trades might look great on a spreadsheet, but real-world friction can erode returns quickly.
• Duration Mismatch: If you poorly hedge your durations, you could inadvertently pick up net sensitivity to interest rate moves, overshadowing your curvature bet.
• Basis Risk: Sometimes, different maturities or bond issues won’t move perfectly in lockstep. Even if you pick the correct direction for the yield shape change, basis risk could hamper your returns.
All these risks emphasize that a butterfly is not a set-and-forget trade. It requires ongoing monitoring and an active exit strategy once your view changes or your profit target is reached.
I remember a colleague who was bullish on U.S. economic growth but felt the market was overestimating how quickly rates at the belly of the curve would rise. She put on a “long butterfly,” shorting tens (the intermediate) and going long twos and thirties (short and long). The trade turned profitable when the Federal Reserve signaled a slower tightening pace than the market expected, causing the 10-year yield to drop relative to the 2-year and 30-year yields. She closed the trade early, before the next Federal Open Market Committee meeting, to lock in gains. This real-life example shows how fundamental views, monetary policy announcements, and yield curve analysis can all come together in a well-timed butterfly trade.
• Perform Thorough Scenario Analyses: Shift your yield curve up or down by 50 basis points in your spreadsheet and see how it impacts your profit or loss. Then try a “pivot,” where short rates move more than long.
• Maintain a Robust Exit Plan: Whether you’re setting a profit target or a stop loss, know when to exit to avoid letting a successful trade turn sour.
• Keep Tabs on Macro Events: Nonfarm payrolls, central bank announcements, inflation readings—these can all drastically shift yield curve expectations.
• Watch the Calendar: Some mid-maturities might be on-the-run (most recently issued) vs. off-the-run (older issues). You want to pick securities with enough liquidity to get in and out easily.
• Overleveraging: Because butterfly trades can appear “market neutral,” it’s tempting to size them too large. But any mismatch in durations or an unexpected rate shock can lead to big losses.
• Focusing on Nominal Yields Alone: If the market’s real yields or inflation expectations are shifting, you might get a curve change that’s quite different from your nominal-based analysis.
• Ignoring Convexity: Sometimes you can get “surprised” by large yield moves if you haven’t factored in how convexities differ across your positions.
At its heart, a butterfly strategy is a nuanced way to take a position on the shape of the yield curve rather than on absolute level of interest rates. By capturing changes in curvature, investors can enhance returns, hedge exposures, or execute relative-value plays—often with less direct sensitivity to broad interest rate shifts. But as with any strategy, success hinges on balancing the cost of the trade, carefully managing risk exposures, and having a well-informed view on future yield curve movements.
• Tuckman, B. (2018). “Fixed-Income Securities.” Wiley.
• Risk.net (Various Articles). Curvature and Relative Value Trading in Fixed Income.
• CFA Institute. (Latest Curriculum). Yield Curve Analysis and Strategies.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.