Explore the differences between public and private equity markets, including structures, regulations, risk-return profiles, and exit strategies.
When people hear the word “equity,” they often imagine the bustling floors of the world’s major stock exchanges, with screens flashing constantly changing share prices. That mental image—of live markets tracking share values second by second—is basically the realm of public equity. Meanwhile, there’s a whole other dimension to investing in firms that don’t list on any public exchange: private equity. Private equity can be downright fascinating, though it sometimes feels mysterious because it’s not always as accessible as publicly traded stocks.
Anyway, let’s walk through the major contrasts of these two realms, from how they’re structured to their risk and return characteristics. I’ll also sprinkle in some personal anecdotes and experiences along the way—like the time I had a friend who was fixated on an early-stage startup’s Series A fundraise to the extent that he was literally staying up all night researching possible angel investor platforms. (He even joked about taking out a second mortgage to get in on the ground floor. Don’t worry; he didn’t.)
Public equity is the total ownership—through listed shares—of companies traded on authorized exchanges like the NYSE, NASDAQ, LSE, or any other recognized market. Shares are:
By contrast, private equity refers to ownership in companies whose shares do not trade on public markets. These include:
Private equity tends to be illiquid, with higher investment minimums and limited investor pools. Buying in means a more hands-on relationship with management—since owners often have seats on the board or direct influence on the strategy.
In public equity, you might hold a position for a few weeks, months, or years. But you can always decide to click “sell” if the stock exchange is open. In private equity, investment horizons often stretch to five, seven, or even ten years, depending on the fund’s mandate. You commit capital that gets “called” gradually, and you typically can’t exit at will.
Why the long holding period? Private equity investments often aim to unlock value through operational improvements, strategic pivoting, or brand repositioning. Think about a venture capital fund: it might invest in five or ten promising startups, expecting only a few to really take off. But for those that succeed, the payoff can be enormous. Meanwhile, a buyout fund might purchase an underperforming division of a large conglomerate, bring in specialists to reorganize the business, and eventually sell it at a higher valuation.
Here’s a simple diagram to give a quick snapshot of how public equity and private equity compare in a flowchart:
flowchart LR A["Public Equity <br/>Traded on regulated exchanges <br/>Wide investor base"] B["Private Equity <br/>Not publicly traded <br/>Limited investor base"] A --> C["High liquidity <br/>Strict disclosure"] B --> D["Illiquid <br/>Minimal disclosure"] C --> E["Potential for strong influence of market sentiment"] D --> E["Focus on operational improvements and strategic reorientation"]
Public companies generally live under the bright lights of regulatory oversight. They file 10-Ks and 10-Qs in the United States (under SEC rules) or their equivalents in other jurisdictions. This means robust disclosure: financial statements, risk updates, executive compensation details, major shareholding changes, and more. Such transparency broadens the investor base but also demands compliance infrastructure. In a sense, public markets are a fishbowl—everyone sees (almost) everything.
On the private side? Well, private equity–backed companies have fewer mandatory disclosure requirements and thus lower compliance costs. That said, private equity investors typically conduct deep due diligence and require regular (but private) reporting. The general public rarely gets to see these details, which is part of why you might not hear about a certain fast-growing tech firm until it’s on the verge of an IPO or major acquisition.
Public equity investors, especially large institutional players or activist hedge funds, can influence management through proxy votes and lobbying efforts. But smaller retail investors typically don’t have as much direct influence. Market sentiment—sometimes driven by macroeconomic data, earnings announcements, or even social media chatter—plays a large role in daily price fluctuations.
Private equity investors, by contrast, usually sit in the driver’s seat when it comes to strategic decisions. They’re the folks who might bring in a specialized CEO, reorganize the supply chain, or push for a new product strategy. The operational improvements and realignment that happen behind the scenes are often the key drivers of return, rather than just waiting for share prices to drift higher with the broader market.
I remember a colleague telling me about a private equity fund that completely overhauled a specialty retail chain, focusing on in-store technology, store layout, and better inventory management. The chain eventually went from borderline bankruptcy to a successful trade sale. That’s classic private equity value creation in action.
For public equities, risk is often correlated with market volatility, sector concentration, and the overall macro environment. Beta, standard deviation, and other metrics typically reflect market movements. Historically, average annual returns for public equities have been strong over the long term but can be quite volatile year to year.
Private equity invests in concentrated positions, often in untested or distressed companies. The potential returns can be quite high, but the risk includes:
Still, the illiquidity premium—an extra return investors demand for tying up their money—can be substantial if the investment works out. Some growth companies financed by venture capital funds have produced eye-popping gains at IPO or buyout.
Public market investors exit simply by selling the stock on the exchange. That’s the hallmark of liquidity. If sentiment sours, share prices may drop, but at least you’ll likely find a buyer—though perhaps at a disappointing price.
Exiting private equity might involve:
If none of these exit routes are attractive, investors may remain locked in longer than anticipated. That’s the trade-off for (potentially) higher returns.
Historically, if you invested in private equity, you were stuck until the fund winded down or the company was sold or listed. Nowadays, limited secondary markets exist where accredited investors or specialized intermediaries exchange shares in private companies. This is still a niche space—prices might be less transparent, trades can take months to complete, and due diligence is challenging. But it’s growing steadily, which might eventually enhance liquidity in the private domain.
One of the biggest differences is how returns are generated and influenced. In public equity, daily share prices fluctuate based on market sentiment, political news, interest rates, macro data, and technical factors. Even if a company’s fundamentals are strong, a broader market downturn can push its share price lower. Conversely, private equity returns are more insulated from immediate sentiment swings because there is no official daily marking to market. Private company valuations adjust periodically, often based on significant milestones or valuation events (e.g., fundraising rounds or a new set of audited financials).
Imagine you’re analyzing a consumer goods company that a private equity firm just scooped up in a leveraged buyout:
If everything goes right, the firm’s value doubles or triples. But if the economy sputters, consumer demand softens, or the rebranding misfires, the heavy debt load could cause insolvency. That’s the payoff structure of private equity in a nutshell—high risk, but also high potential reward.
For CFA® Level I candidates, understanding public vs. private equity is crucial for building foundations in corporate finance and portfolio management. You’ll see references to these concepts throughout your studies, especially with regard to capital market structures, the risk-return spectrum, and fundamental investment analysis.
At the more advanced Levels II and III, you’ll dive deeper into private equity valuation, portfolio construction, and how institutional investors allocate capital among public equities, private funds, and other alternative assets. You might get scenario-based exam questions asking you to identify the key differences between investing in a publicly traded industrial conglomerate versus an LBO-focused private equity fund.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.