Explore how a nation’s Terms of Trade ratio influences competitiveness, living standards, and global trade dynamics. Understand key drivers like commodity price shifts, currency fluctuations, and domestic productivity changes.
Well, let me just say right off the bat: Terms of Trade (TOT) might sound like another dry economic ratio, but, trust me, it’s surprisingly central to how a country thrives in the global marketplace. TOT is basically the ratio of a country’s export prices to its import prices. If that ratio is rising, we say the TOT is improving, because the country can now import more goods per unit of exports sold. And who doesn’t like getting more for less? On the flip side, if that ratio declines (also known as a deterioration), a country’s exports don’t stretch as far in buying imports.
Formally, economists often compute TOT as:
That’s it—a neat little formula that has a big impact on a country’s standard of living and competitiveness. In other words, TOT is kind of a yardstick for how much a nation’s goods are fetching in world markets relative to what it’s paying for stuff from abroad.
TOT doesn’t change spontaneously. Global demand, currency movements, commodity prices, and changes in domestic productivity are just some of the dynamic factors at play.
Picture a country like Chile, a major copper exporter. When global copper prices spike, Chile’s export price rises. If import prices don’t move up as much—or if they even fall at the same time—Chile’s TOT improves. The resource-exporting countries (Brazil with soybeans, Saudi Arabia with oil, Australia with iron ore) tend to see TOT fluctuate sharply in line with commodity booms and busts. One day you’re flush with foreign exchange because oil is $100 a barrel; six months later, it’s $50 a barrel, and TOT—and government revenues—just took a nose dive.
Then there’s the demand side. Let’s say consumers worldwide suddenly fall in love with a certain country’s high-end electronics—think about the popularity of some new smartphone brand. As demand ramps up, the price of those exports may rise (though this depends on market competition and supply capacity, of course). If that export price climbs faster than what the country has to pay for imports, TOT heads upward.
A stronger domestic currency sometimes means imports become cheaper in the local currency, which can help improve TOT if export prices remain stable or do not fall by the same magnitude. However, it can also make your exports more expensive to the rest of the world, potentially reducing export volumes and weakening your competitiveness over time. So the net effect of currency swings on TOT can be tricky. Some countries try to manage their exchange rates to steer TOT in favorable directions, but that’s best tackled in the “Exchange Rate Determination” topics (see Section 6.2 – Exchange Rate Determination and Regimes).
Improvements in productivity can mean you produce more output for each unit of input. The cost of producing goods might decline, which (if competitive pressures don’t fully pass the cost savings along to foreign buyers) can elevate your surplus margin. In some cases, improved productivity translates into lower export prices that stimulate demand for your exports, but it might reduce TOT if your export prices fall faster than your import prices. There’s a fine line here—lower export prices can spark bigger volume gains, but from the TOT angle, it could mean the ratio dips unless import prices fall equally.
I remember a professor who always used the analogy of TOT to your personal purchasing power. If your TOT is on the rise, you’re effectively “earning” more on each export, so you can afford more imports. That means you can buy more foreign technology, consumer goods, and capital equipment with the same volume of exported goods. This often leads to higher real income levels and, eventually, improved living standards. Conversely, when TOT deteriorates for a prolonged period, it can crimp real incomes, prompting households to cut back or forcing governments to intervene (often with unhelpful results if they’re trying to fix TOT through trade barriers—see 5.2 Tariffs, Quotas, and Other Trade Barriers).
An improvement in TOT can result in what we call a “real income effect.” If export prices rise faster than the import prices, national income can expand (assuming export volume doesn’t plummet in the process). For many economies, especially those heavily dependent on commodity exports, TOT can be a robust bellwether for short-term economic health and for government revenues.
Now, let’s talk resource exporters—countries like Venezuela (oil), Qatar (natural gas), and Indonesia (various commodities). Because the global prices of these resources are determined by complex supply and demand interactions—and occasionally by politics—these countries can experience wide swings in their TOT. A spike in oil prices due to a geopolitical event can send TOT sky-high for an oil exporter, resulting in a quick surge of export earnings. But if prices come crashing down—a scenario we’ve seen multiple times—it’s like a balloon popping.
This TOT volatility can lead to what’s often called the “resource curse” or “Dutch disease,” where a country’s currency appreciates so much during boom times that other export sectors (like manufacturing) can’t compete internationally. Then, if the resource price collapses, the country is left with a diminished non-resource export sector. The TOT measure is a nice, direct gauge of that roller-coaster ride.
A country’s TOT is sometimes used as a shorthand measure of its competitive standing in global trade. If your export prices remain robust relative to your import prices—or at least stable over time—it often suggests you’re either producing high-value goods the world wants or you’ve got resources in short supply (leading to a higher market price). A deteriorating TOT may hint at eroding competitiveness, higher input costs, or an unfavorable currency movement.
But be careful: TOT alone doesn’t tell the whole story of competitiveness. For example, TOT can rise because your export prices soared due to an unanticipated commodity boom. That’s great in the short run, but if you haven’t actually boosted your productivity, that TOT improvement might be fleeting. When the global commodity cycle turns, you could tumble right back down. Long-term competitiveness needs more structural foundations such as technology, skilled labor forces, stable governance, and efficient infrastructure.
Below is a conceptual Mermaid diagram illustrating how different factors feed into TOT and the possible outcomes for a country’s economy:
flowchart TB A["Global Demand <br/> & Commodity Prices"] --> B["Export Prices"] C["Currency Fluctuations <br/> & Domestic Productivity"] --> B B --> D["Terms of Trade (TOT)"] D --> E["Standard of Living"] D --> F["Real Income Effect"] D --> G["Short-run Volatility <br/> (esp. in Commodity Exporters)"] E --> H["Possible <br/>Better Quality of Life"] F --> H G --> I["Resource Booms <br/> & Busts"]
In this chart:
• Global demand and commodity prices affect export prices.
• Currency movements and domestic productivity also feed into export price shifts (and can indirectly influence import prices).
• Combining export and import prices determines TOT.
• TOT, in turn, impacts the nation’s standard of living, real income, and volatility in resource-exporting nations.
Consider “CafeLand,” a country that exports coffee and imports machinery for its agricultural sector. Last year, the global coffee price jumped 20%. Simultaneously, the price of imported machinery from abroad rose only 5%. As a result:
• CafeLand’s export price index soared thanks to the coffee boom.
• Its import price index for machinery edged up modestly.
Hence, the TOT ratio improved significantly. This TOT improvement let CafeLand’s coffee exporters earn more revenue for the same quantity sold, increasing national income. With those higher earnings, they can import more agricultural machinery to upgrade farms, further boosting productivity. But if coffee prices tumble next year, TOT might deteriorate quickly, possibly stalling economic development if the country relies primarily on coffee as a growth engine.
• Overreliance on Commodity Exports: TOT can be extremely volatile, making it tough for governments and businesses to plan.
• Misinterpreting Exchange Rate Effects: A currency appreciation might lower the cost of imports in local currency terms (seemingly boosting TOT), but hamper export competitiveness.
• Ignoring Volume Changes: TOT measures prices, not volumes. A TOT improvement might come with a sharp drop in export volume if prices become too high for international buyers.
• Policies to “Fix” TOT: Governments may impose tariffs or quotas to protect domestic industries, but that might only worsen competitiveness in the long run.
• Diversification of Exports: Spread dependency across multiple export products so that a single commodity price swing doesn’t upend your economy.
• Hedging Strategies: Especially for commodity exporters, sophisticated financial tools (like derivatives) can safeguard against wild commodity price fluctuations.
• Fostering Innovation and Productivity: Over the long term, competitiveness often depends on producing higher-value goods and innovative services that sustain export price advantages.
• Monitoring Exchange Rate Policies: A stable exchange rate can moderate TOT volatility, though it may also limit policy flexibility in other areas.
• Chapter 6: Currency Exchange Rates – TOT is deeply influenced by exchange rate regimes and parity relationships.
• Section 5.1: Comparative Advantage – TOT shifts play a role in shaping the comparative advantage of nations.
• Section 1.5: Elasticities – The price elasticity of demand for exports and imports can amplify or mitigate TOT changes.
• Terms of Trade (TOT): The ratio of a country’s export prices to its import prices.
• TOT Improvement: A higher fraction or ratio, indicating relatively higher export prices or relatively lower import prices.
• TOT Deterioration: A lower ratio, suggesting relatively lower export prices or higher import prices.
• Real Income Effect: Changes in a nation’s actual purchasing power due to TOT fluctuations.
• Commodity Exporters: Countries whose TOT is largely driven by resource price swings in global markets.
• Always consider the source of TOT changes—commodity spike, currency movement, or demand shift—to gauge how long an improvement might last.
• Remember that TOT’s effect on real income is stronger if export volume remains stable, so watch for big volume changes in the data.
• For scenario-based exam questions, read carefully whether changes in TOT came with structural shifts in productivity or merely superficial price flips. That can drastically change your recommended policy approach.
• In essay (constructed-response) questions, incorporate TOT knowledge with references to elasticity, currency regimes, and balance of payments to form a well-rounded answer.
Important Notice: FinancialAnalystGuide.com provides supplemental CFA study materials, including mock exams, sample exam questions, and other practice resources to aid your exam preparation. These resources are not affiliated with or endorsed by the CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned exclusively by CFA Institute. Our content is independent, and we do not guarantee exam success. CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of our products.